piclist 2017\09\27\053334a >
Thread: 18Fxxxx Instructions
picon face BY : Anthony Nixon email (remove spam text)

Hi all,

It's been a long time since asking a question here :-)

I've started to use a 18F47K40 chip for a project and I'm still using
assembler for it.

In the other PIC families you could omit the destination bit (F) from
an instruction as the assembler sets it as default.

I gather this is not the case for 18F series when you can have a
destination and RAM access bit

Eg.  ADDWF MyReg,W,A

Do all instructions have to be fully written in this way?

I am porting a 16F application to 18F because I need the extra ROM
space. If this is the case then I will have to rewrite and qualify
every instruction.


-- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at

<CADkYAvqqCvh0PDA7jnzYEkp54wyhu1a_LkNmm0_qJ1X_Oh8sug@mail.gmail.com> quoted-printable

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=18F
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) 18Fxxxx Instructions

month overview.

new search...