piclist 2008\07\27\144712a >
Thread: Better-designed CFL's?
face BY : Carl Denk email (remove spam text)

For the fluorescent tubes, the T-8 configuration with electronic
ballasts save considerable power. A few months back I posted the
comparison, and for lights on 12 hours a day, 48" long tubes, based on
my actual amps of current drawn measurement, the pay back was like 18
months. It cost me $35 /2 tube fixture to convert which was 2 green
tubes, 4 sockets (not required, the tubes use same socket, but these
were old and cracking), and an electronic ballast.

Harold Hallikainen wrote:
{Quote hidden}

<488CC29C.4010506@alltel.net> 7bit

In reply to: <47126.>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=better+designed
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Better-designed CFL's?

month overview.

new search...