piclist 2008\07\24\195159a >
Thread: :: Why most published research findings are false.
www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=why+most+published
flavicon
face BY : Cedric Chang email (remove spam text)



I read this paper and the authors make some pretty amazing leaps of  
logic.  This does not mean they are wrong and I believe they are  
probably right ; still it makes me realize what a cat's bag of  
confusion most information packets are these days.  Probably for the  
past 10,000 years as well.
cc

{Quote hidden}

<EF88D031-EFFE-40A4-B9AA-9849B4CF1C6E@nope9.com> 7bit

In reply to: <48888398.3090506@nu-ins.com>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=why+most+published
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) :: Why most published research findings are false.

month overview.

new search...