piclist 2008\07\23\174047a >
Thread: :: Why most published research findings are false.
www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=why+most+published
flavicon
face BY : Tony Smith email (remove spam text)



> > A shame they are not (or, alas, cannot) be applied in a few other
> > 'sciences' and areas of endeavour that I won't even name
> here for risk
> > of starting a conflagration.
> >
> >
> >         Russell
>
>
> Maybe we could mosey on over to the [OT] tag and discuss
> 'science areas' that are truly bogus, such as psychology and
> psychiatric medicine.
> cc


Is that you, Tom Cruise?

Tony

<E1KLm3o-00010O-85@sydgsomail1.beagle.com.au> 7bit

In reply to: <5BE8670B-0A04-4E56-82C3-BA7A33C62905@nope9.com>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=why+most+published
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) :: Why most published research findings are false.

month overview.

new search...