piclist 2005\08\19\073047a >
Thread: I say it is spinach . . .
www.piclist.com/techref/io/serial/spis.htm?key=spi
picon face BY : Gerhard Fiedler email (remove spam text)



Wouter van Ooijen wrote:

>> Now I may just rationalize why I don't need what I don't have, but I
>> really think I would seriously try to avoid recursion even if I had it
>> available.
>
> But it would be better if the compiler forced you to avoid it :)

That's exactly what it is doing :)

> And when doing that, it could caculate your stack usage, and check it
> against the stack/ram limits of the chip (and maybe take evasive action
> on the stack aspect).

Not sure you made a joke here, but if not -- how would the compiler
calculate the stack usage of a recursive algorithm that operates on an ADC
input?

Gerhard
<gj038zcwh9my$.yr1eq7ipm1g8$.dlg@40tude.net> 7bit

In reply to: <002001c5a3ee$bb8867f0$0b00a8c0@PAARD>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/io/serial/spis.htm?key=spi
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) I say it is spinach . . .

month overview.

new search...