piclist 2003\02\26\005604a >
Thread: MPLAB version control?
face BY : Ned Konz email (remove spam text)

On Tuesday 25 February 2003 07:43 pm, Harold Hallikainen wrote:
> Wow! Thanks for the analysis. Can anyone think of a good reason
> MPLAB doesn't store paths as relative, or let you decide how to do
> it?

Some guesses, having been a programmer for a commercial software

* Lazy programmers. This is usually the case when you see a binary
file that looks like a memory dump. Such files are rarely portable
from one version to the next of a product without extra work. Effort
saved now will be extra effort later -- for someone else, you hope.

* No requirement for relative paths. "Hmm.. you mean you want to move

* No interest in making an open config format, perhaps because you
could do something interesting with it (like make it easy to use
their competitors' compilers (CCS, for instance)).

{Quote hidden}

Ned Konz

http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
<200302252059.59163@ned.bike-nomad.com> 7bit

In reply to: <20030225.194342.13596.216422@webmail01.lax.untd.com>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/languages.htm?key=mplab
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) MPLAB version control?

month overview.

new search...