piclist 2002\09\26\131718a >
Thread: How efficient Asm vs PB etc
www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/languages.htm?key=asm
face picon face BY : Wouter van Ooijen email (remove spam text)



> Now, C will never be as tight as ASM written by a good coder.

Keep in mind that it all depends (to a large extent, anyway) on the
amount of effort you put into it. Take just assembler. When assigned to
do a one-off project where enginering cost must be minimised I'll write
fast and produce a different kind of assembler than for a 1M units
project, where I can spend months to squeeze the code into the next
smaller chip. Bottom line: there is no *the* effeciency of asm or C,
there is a wide range of effort versus code density (and of course there
are many more variables: quality, execution speed, ease of modification,
etc).

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: http://www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.


<000001c26580$6587c0d0$0b00a8c0@PAARD> 7bit

In reply to: <OF8BCDE7E7.20AB940C-ON86256C40.004D3BD9-86256C40.004E2D18@saltonusa.com>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/languages.htm?key=asm
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) How efficient Asm vs PB etc

month overview.

new search...