piclist 2002\09\04\072143a >
Thread: Fitting pulses into a time slot
face picon face BY : Wouter van Ooijen email (remove spam text)

> > or maybe an 18F452 at 40MHz ?
> AFAIK supply is a potential hurdle - last time I looked (for part
> of this job actually) 18F were on a fairly long lead time and also
> not available singly, unlike AVR. Whilst I'd like to move on to the
> newer PICs, now is not the right time to outlay on a tube. I'll be
> trying to get the best out of the 16F628 @ 20MHz and if that
> fails then I'll go to something faster


Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: http://www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

<000001c25405$0df5afd0$0b00a8c0@PAARD> 7bit

In reply to: <000a01c253f4$7b2a71a0$ce95a7cb@joe>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/time.htm?key=time
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Fitting pulses into a time slot

month overview.

new search...