www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/time.htm?key=time

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jinx wrote:

{Quote hidden}

The accumulator, or more accurately phase-accumulator, works with the

reciprocal of the IC/pulse ratio.

For example, so far the discussion has been mostly around the number of

Instruction Cycles (IC) per pulse or IC/pulse. Using integer arithmetic

you'll quantize this ratio to an integer. Unfortunately, the tiny error in

the quantization accumulates into a large error after repeated additions.

So the phase accumulator works by keep track of these tiny errors, i.e. it

accumulates the error, and when the accumulated value reachs a threshold

the quantum output is adjusted.

In this particular application you present the example of 1781 pulses in

147465 instruction cycles (the total instructions in 32 ms for your

particular crystal). The instruction cycles per pulse ratio is:

147465/1781 = 82.79

As you noted in the original example, the .79 fractional part is a

nuisance. Now, suppose you look at the reciprocal:

1781/147465 = 0.0120774

You still have a fraction - but let's ignore that for the moment...

Suppose you were able to add 0.0120774 to a variable every instruction

cycle. If the variable (phase accumulator) starts off at zero, then in 82

cycles the count will be 0.99035 and in 83 would be 1.0024. When the phase

accumulator exceeds 1.0, toggle the pulse and subtract 1.0 from the

accumulator. Now the accumulator is 0.0024. Repeat this process. Most

pulses will be 83 instructions wide. However, occasionally the accumulated

error will bias the phase accumulator such that for some iterations the

pulses will be 82 cycles!

In this particular example, the 0.79 remainder in the division of

147465/1781 means that roughly 8 out of 10 pulse will be 83 cycles wide

and 2 out of 10 will be 82 cycles wide. For example, the first few

iterations of the phase accumulator would yield:

pw phase

-----------

83 1.002427

83 2.004855

83 3.007283

83 4.009711

82 5.000061 <== shorter pulse

In other words, whenever the fractional portion exceeds 0.012077 you lose

one instruction cycle!

There are a couple of practicle issues here.

- dividing by 147465 (or however many cycles are in 32 ms ) can be

simplified by multiplying by the reciprocal - it's a constant

- Rolling over at "1.0" isn't too useful. It's easier to scale the

numbers so that you rollover at 2^n

- Getting single instruction cycle precision delays is tricky.

(see the PWM code on my web page). If you can use TMR1, then

you could write an interrupt routine that will reload the

period register at every cycle.

Scott

--

http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList

piclist-unsubscribe-requestEraseMEmitvma.mit.edu

In reply to: <001801c25313$0623f8e0$369ca7cb@joe>

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/time.htm?key=time