piclist 2002\08\24\114242a >
Thread: Wondering about the avr...
face BY : mike@TakeThisOuTwhitewing.co.uk

On Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:00:21 -0400, you wrote:

{Quote hidden}

Uart TX and RX can be enabled seperately
UART can do high baudrates at low clocks
>AVR Cons
>* Perception of lack of availabilty. It was a reality in the past so it had
>  a kernel of truth. Probably scared off a lot of developers permanently.
High power consumption at 5V
Non-consistent interrupt response time (can be a problem with timer
EEPROM can get corrupted in brownout
Lower output drive than PICs
Inconsistent skip/branck instructions (some times you use skips,
sometimes you use branches, and they can only branch +/-128 bytes,
leading to spaghetti code...)
No immediate XOR
Will not wake from sleep on an edge (needs input held til CPU wakes

http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList

<en6fmu8j9cb2bl1ablqedclae0e7soskp2@4ax.com> quoted-printable

In reply to: <20020824090020.A14751@cleon.cc.gatech.edu>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=wondering+about
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Wondering about the avr...

month overview.

new search...