piclist 2001\10\23\083239a >
Thread: why are Atmels so cheap vs. PICs
face BY : Kathy Quinlan email (remove spam text)

----- Original Message -----
From: "David VanHorn" <RemoveMEdvanhornspamCEDAR.NET>
> I would expect that C should be more efficient on the AVR, as it seems
> designed for it, but I'm not a "C guy" yet. Too busy making a living in
> assembler. :)

Dave, if you read the stuff from atmel (I know we assembler guys do not read
the junk on C as we never use it) they say the AVR was designed and
instructions were implemented or left out to make the AVR better under C, in
fact the AVR was designed for C :o)



/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  |        K.A.Q. Electronics
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | Software and Electronic Engineering
X  - NO Word docs in e-mail  |      Perth Western Australia
/ \                                            |        Ph +61 419 923 731

http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList

<026c01c15bbf$043f1a10$fe00a8c0@wskatinka> 7bit

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) why are Atmels so cheap vs. PICs

month overview.

new search...