piclist 2001\07\16\062709a >
Thread: who else uses the 16F877 ???
face BY : mike@whitewing.co.uk

On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:39:07 -0400, you wrote:

>Hello all, who else uses the 16F877?  Who else is totally disgusted that the
>77A revision is delayed until next march at the earliest???  The 77 is a
>flash chip that if you leave it flash upgradable, you must leave it
>completely NAKED for copying.  Is this as ridiculous as I think it is?

There is some scope for protection against simple copying- you can
protect the bootloader area, and include calls to routines there in
your main code.

http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

<u6e5ltc05io3ifvl9hmrtner2v37ucpp2v@4ax.com> quoted-printable

In reply to: <NFBBIHDFILDMBPKDOIICGEHOCAAA.ronant@optonline.net>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=16F
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) who else uses the 16F877 ???

month overview.

new search...