ENOUGH! (was: "Re: [OT]: Brain Burp Rounding??")
Bob Ammerman email (remove spam text)
> Surely any child could point out that with the
> 0.9999 issue that ANY POSSIBLE STEP can only reduce
> the error to a smaller amount. The *number* of steps
> is completely confusing and superfluous, the error
> must always exist as there is NO POSSIBLE STEP
> that can eliminate the error, only reduce it a bit
> more. And you really don't need impressive formulas
> to understand that reality? :o)
Roman, thank you. You gave me the words to deal with this.
Above, you said:
"The *number* of steps is completely confusing and superfluous"
However, 'infinitely many steps' is _not_ a number of steps. Rather it is
the process carried out for (if I may) an _infinite_ number of steps.
Remember: 'infinity' is not a number, its a concept.
That is the difference.
(contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=brain+burp+rounding
You must be a member of the
piclist mailing list
(not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the