www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=brain+burp+rounding

>

>Its value is exactly 1.

So I did a little digging, and found this link.

http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/~igc/tch/ma1002/appl/node57.html

However, all that is said about a converging series is that you can

determine a value that it approaches. I see no requirement or statement

that it REACHES that value.

Here also,

http://forum.swarthmore.edu/dr.math/problems/may7.8.98.html

S = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ... + 1/2^n + ...

This series is described as convergent (obvious) and approaching 1, but not

described as being equal to 1

Here:

http://www.misd.wednet.edu/~kim_schjelderup/Integrated%203/Pages/Seq&Series/4.7l%20Inifinite%20Series%20(WP).pdf

Finally the statement:

If the sequence of partial sums of an infinite series has a limit, then

that limit is the sum of the series.

Looks to me like we are defining "sum of the series" as something special,

and we are not saying that the series is equal to the limit, in a manner

similar to the way that "spin" is used in quantum mechanics.

It's certainly useful in calculation, because it causes those awkward

infinities to dissapear, by ignoring the infinitely tiny difference between

the actual result, and the defined result.

Inverting Zeno's paradox, the fallacy is that a finite distance (or number)

does not become infinite, simply because it can be divided into an infinte

number of smaller distances (or numbers)

--

Dave's Engineering Page: http://www.dvanhorn.org

I would have a link to FINDU here in my signature line, but due to the

inability of sysadmins at TELOCITY to differentiate a signature line from

the text of an email, I am forbidden to have it.

--

http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different

ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

In reply to: <008c01c0ebe4$4fdf9ee0$1de9c540@CDS>

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=brain+burp+rounding