Why Steinhart-Hart equation?
David VanHorn email (remove spam text)
At 09:28 AM 4/19/01 -0600, Jose S. Samonte Jr. wrote:
>Hello everybody! =)
>In my project, I used Steinhart-Hart equation to linearize the output of the
>thermistor, because I knew that it is the most commonly used. But my professor
>wants me to give much much better reasons why I used it. He said that there
>are other equations. He wants to know why I opted to use Steinhart-Hart
>equation. Can anyone, please help me? What are the advantages of using
I think what he's getting at here, is that "because everyone else does it
this way" is not a very strong reason.
I get this frequently in engineering meetings, and I see both sides of the
On one hand, if a lot of people do it one way, there may be a good reason
On the other hand, it's a lazy attitude, and I've seen many cases where the
way something is usually done is not the best way to do it.
I think he's looking for you to present him with a "strong" reason for
The only one I can think of is that it dosen't have to be calibrated to the
individual thermistor, like a table would be, for maximum accuracy.
Dave's Engineering Page: http://www.dvanhorn.org
Where's dave? http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?kc6ete-9
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
In reply to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=why+steinhart+hart
You must be a member of the
piclist mailing list
(not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the