piclist 2001\03\15\044712a >
Thread: I2C pullups
face BY : mike@spamwhitewing.co.uk

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:45:03 -0600, you wrote:

{Quote hidden}

Although the spec allows for it, I have never encountered a device
which does this. EEProms certainly never do. In practice you shouldn't worry about driving SCL both ways and
omitting the pullup unless the slave device datasheet says it uses
clock stretching. If a device _did_ use clock stretching, you would have to adapt the
code as well to cope with it.  
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

<ohpvatc142m6ednh5ns4n9sv2kv3pqbbid@4ax.com> quoted-printable

In reply to: <OF95D82AC7.22979D0E-ON86256A0F.00709153@graco.com>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/i2cs.htm?key=i2c
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) I2C pullups

month overview.

new search...