piclist 2001\01\02\110931a >
Thread: C++ vs. Visual Basic
face BY : M. Adam Davis email (remove spam text)

Background: I work full time as a VB programmer, know C, and finally took
a class on C++.

I started microcontrollers on the basic stamp (the first one, before the
second version came out).  I moved from the basic stamp to assembly and C
on the pic for the same reason I use C and C++ on more and more of my
projects - I can't get VB to go fast enough, make small distributions, and
access the hardware easily enough.  VB has other limitations, but as a
hardware guy I am more concerned about those three.  You cannot make a
complete program in VB that fits on one disk (I haven't tried - I suppose
it might be possible to fit msvbxx.dll on a disk with the other runtime
files).  It is practically impossible to access the pc hardware directly
with VB without extra dlls or activex components.  VB is /SLOW/.  As in
molasses-running-uphill-on-a-cold-day type of slow.  Sure, it gets the job
done, and for many/most projects it is fast enough.  And you can't fight
the fact that sometimes development time is more important than run-time

But it was good that I started out with basic and understood its
limitations, and it helps you better understand the windows interface and
how events and messages are dealt with - crucial to using vc effectively.


Brian Kraut wrote:
{Quote hidden}

http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

<3A51FD18.8A4520C6@ubasics.com> 7bit

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/language/index.htm?key=basic
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) C++ vs. Visual Basic

month overview.

new search...