piclist 2000\11\07\141803a >
Thread: The tintinnabulation of the noise
face BY : Dan Michaels email (remove spam text)

Lawrence Lile wrote:
>This could easily ignite the Average vs Median debate that took up so much
bandwidth about two years ago.  I am convinced that median filter techniques
are superior to averaging, for this reason:  Say I have some pulse noise,
with a nasty 60 hz hum superimposed on it  (that's probably what I'm dealing
>3.0, 3.1, 2.9, 3.0, 3.1, 2.9, 1.0, 3.0, 2.9, 3.1
>What is the average?   2.8 by my calculation
>What if you eliminate the last data point?  the average is 2.76   hmmmmm....
>What is the best representation of the data?  3.0, the median, no matter
how many data points we have.

By selectively eliminating far outliers, you might get a better
values either way.

http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList


See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) The tintinnabulation of the noise

month overview.

new search...