RESPONSE: 5V Logic Bypass caps - SMD value/phy size
James Paul email (remove spam text)
Capacitors exhibit reactance when excited by alternating current.
This reactance opposes changes in voltage. If the capacitance
value remains constant, and frequency is increased, the amount of
this reactance goes down. Likewise, the opposite is true, that
if the capacitance remains constant, and frequency is decreased,
reactance goes up. This shows that Capacitive Reactance is
Inversely Proportional to Frequency. Now, lets say we have chosen
our capacitor value to give us a specific reactance value at a given
frequency. And this frequency is the lowest we have to deal with.
In this case, as frequency goes up, reactance goes down, and the
impedance gets lower. In bypassing, this means that as frequency
goes up, the capacitor acts as more of a short than at lower
So, the statement
"This suggests that lower capacitance a priori works better at
is somewhat correct. What it really means is that you need less
capacitance at higher frequencies to get the same value of reactance
that you get with a larger capacitor at lower frequencies.
My understanding of the specifications suggests the opposite: for
any make of capacitor, higher capacitance always works better at
also is somewhat true. From a capacitive reactance point of view,
the higher the frequency, the less the capacitive reactance of any
capacitor. Therefore the above statement is true. But, there are
other losses that are also frequency dependent. The most obvious is
INDUCTANCE. This is directly proportional to frequency, and opposes
a change in current. So, at some point, what you gain in lower
capacitive reactance will be offset some by an increase in Inductive
reactance. Therefore, you have the potential for any degree of
inefficiency. So in this respect, the above statement is not true.
What might be true is that certain types of capacitors are only
available in small denominations, and these types have lower ESR
and ESI so they work better at higher frequencies.
Is basically true. ESR and ESI have the most effect on Q, which
translates to effeciency. Of course this means overall effeciency,
not just at a given frequency or range of frequencies. It reduces
the amount of heat generated inside tha cap which means that less
energy is consumed by the cap and transformed into heat, which
indicates higher effeciency.
Just my 2 cents worth. Sorry for butting in uninvited.
On Mon, 05 June 2000, "Robert A. LaBudde" wrote:
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=logic+bypass+caps
You must be a member of the
piclist mailing list
(not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the