piclist 2000\05\31\030138a >
Thread: Embedded Internet enabling methods: Which?
face BY : TOM THERON email (remove spam text)

PC104  form factor does not fit the requirement: space, peripherals and cost

.----- Original Message -----
From: Byron A Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [EE] Embedded Internet enabling methods: Which?

> I definitely don't intend it for PIC , I'll need at least an 8051 with
> of external memory, or 80188, or 80386EX or...

Then why not just go with a PC104 type form factor and use a standard PC OS?


<004101bfcace$5e7d31c0$ca9e22c4@canopus> 7bit

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=which
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Embedded Internet enabling methods: Which?

month overview.

new search...