piclist 2000\05\30\055315a >
Thread: Embedded Internet enabling methods: Which?
face BY : TOM THERON email (remove spam text)

>Except it isn't really embedded internet, because it requires a
>"real" computer to act as a gateway between the LAN and the 'net.
>If that works for the application, great, but it's apples and oranges..

I agree with you, Spehro,  I had a closer look at their web site. All they
had done was to implement a proprietary protocol to a PC and from there
captured the data into the internet environment. For "local" type of
projects, proprietary is OK, but as soon as we speak about international
markets, I shy away.

Lets see what others have to say.

Bset regards,

Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the
EraseMEspeffspamEraseMEinterlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Contributions invited->The AVR-gcc FAQ is at: http://www.bluecollarlinux.com

<000901bfca1d$565a8b20$349e22c4@canopus> 7bit

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=which
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Embedded Internet enabling methods: Which?

month overview.

new search...