piclist 2000\05\24\035232a >
Thread: [EE] Phase locking DRO's
face picon face BY : Alan B Pearce email (remove spam text)

>One also has to match the cable delays to within an IF wavelength. One also
>introduces an 'offset' in the LO to accommodate the look angle and it's effects
>on path length.

Perhaps it did not come across clearly enough in what I wrote, but I envisaged
that these could be taken care of by the phase offset of the LO. I guess the
problem here is the cable length can be significantly more than 360 degrees at
the LO frequency! Certainly I expected to be able to adjust the look angle
factor with the LO, but I guess the physical spacing again becomes more than 360

>In theory one doesn't even need a D/A, just PWM and a LPF.

I would have thought this could introduce a heap of unwanted sidebands on the LO
due to filtering difficulties. Also I figured that the D/A would have much finer
control steps for the LO, without going through the math of just how fine they
may need to be.

<007501bfc554$ef010750$5dbdf682@ssdwkiwi.AG.rl.ac.uk> 7bit

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) [EE] Phase locking DRO's

month overview.

new search...