piclist 1999\04\16\141109a >
Thread: CRC16
www.piclist.com/techref/method/errors.htm?key=crc
flavicon
face BY : Dr. Imre Bartfai email (remove spam text)



Hello,

it sounds good, but ... how would you name the different CRC items
having common algorythm and 16 bit length? In your example it would be the
wording "human" or maybe "male human" :-) ... The sense of the question
is, I think, that if we talk about CRC it is more important to know how
long is the calculated result, and it is less or at the moment not at all
important, which particular polynomial is being chosen. For example: "I
offer for you CRC16 as CRC8 would not be sensitive enough, but CRC32 seems
to be overkill". I elaborated a comparative table for this decision (see
also the "birthday paradox" thread.). The results are interesting, really.

Imre

On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Wagner Lipnharski wrote:

{Quote hidden}

<Pine.LNX.3.96.990416190606.212A-100000@prof.pmmf.hu>

In reply to: <37174498.8BCAFC12@earthlink.net>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/method/errors.htm?key=crc
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) CRC16

month overview.

new search...