piclist 1997\09\16\005406a >
Thread: Barcode and the PIC [OT]
face BY : mikesmith_oz.nosp*m@relaymail.net

On 15 Sep 97 at 16:04, Harold Hallikainen wrote:

{Quote hidden}

Which is the dilemma between selling multiple quantities of an
identical item, and using the barcode as a asset number.  Since ppl
don't need to remember barcodes, why not add an extra, say, 128 bits
at the manufacture stage, starting at 0 for every unique product.
You wouldn't need to store the entire number, hashing it with the
unique product number would do...
(remove the you know what before replying)
<199709160444.OAA14637@pasteur.dialix.com.au> 7BIT

In reply to: <19970915.130309.3087.1.HaroldHallikainen@juno.com>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Barcode and the PIC [OT]

month overview.

new search...