piclist 1997\09\15\024139a >
Thread: Barcode and the PIC [OT]
face BY : mikesmith_oz.nosp*mspam_OUT@TakeThisOuTrelaymail.net

On 15 Sep 97 at 0:55, Walter Banks wrote:
{Quote hidden}

Indeed.  I wrote a decoder in basic on a z80 platform (CPM and a very
early MS Basic interpreter).  The easiest way is to sample the
photo-transistor return and store it into array, then got thru it
afterwords.  This has the advantage of allowing you to check for
differing bar-code standards. (and the disadvantage that you need a
fair bit of ram, and a start sampling indication)

> One assumption that is useful is to remember the
> fastest measured speed of a hand held wand was
> 42in/sec  (~1m/sec)

Reminds me of a fun party trick of mine (when I had a barcode
reader),  I'd take a 3mm permanent marker and draw barcodes by hand -
then scan them to prove their accuracy.  Trick is to remember to draw
them BIG.  Fairly easy for 3 of 9.  I wouldn't try EAN/UPC though.

Wonder why checkout operators in supermarkets seem to think that
scanning a rejected package faster will make it scan better?  This
applies to the EFTPOS magstripe readers too.  They give it a fast
swipe - it doesn't work - then swipe it at the speed of sound and
seem surprised when it still doesn't work.
(remove the you know what before replying)
<199709150631.QAA13485@pasteur.dialix.com.au> 7BIT

In reply to: <341CBFDF.3859@bytecraft.com>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Barcode and the PIC [OT]

month overview.

new search...