On Monday, July 14, 1997 12:32 AM, pic microcontroller discussion list On
Behalf Of Andy Tucker wrote:
{Quote hidden}> ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC8FED.AC0EBF40
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Do you have a source for the outdoor transducer?
> TIA
> Andy Tucker
>
> ----------
> From: Tom Mariner[SMTP:
EraseMETom_Marinerspam_OUT
TakeThisOuTMSN.COM]
> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 1997 8:41 AM
> To:
PICLIST
spam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: ultrasonic ranging
>
> Are you working with the indoor or the ruggedized Polaroid transducer? The
> indoor (the round black mesh-looking one) has a lot better gain, but doesn't
> like being splashed alot. The outdoor is elipsoid-shaped and has a more
> focused pattern.
>
> In any case, you have to be careful of:
>
> The ringing of the input signal after sending the sonar pulse (You must
blank
> for x amount of time.)
> targets that will bounce back an even stronger signal. (sometimes)
> signals from other transducers firing in the same frequency.
> broadband sonar noise -- Try shooting white noise ala air brakes or an air
> hose nearby and watch a real strong echo.
> Both frequency and voltage on the output transducer are critical with rather
> narrow bands.
>
> I've got a patent in that field and had so solve a lot of stupid little
> problems to get the devices to work reliably. (PIC C57 which also powered
the
{Quote hidden}> RS-485 network.) You can get more accurate than a foot -- Ours is running .6
> inches reliably. I'd like to get more detailed with code, etc. but I'll bet
> our customer would get reasonably upset.
>
> Tom
>
> ----------
> From: pic microcontroller discussion list on behalf of Frank B. Scalzo
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 1996 11:32 AM
> To:
@spam@PICLISTKILLspam
MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: ultrasonic ranging
>
> I am working on a project that needs to find the distance to objects.
> Currently I am using using a PIC16C84 as my controller. I'm using 40kHz
> transmit and recieve transducers from polaroid. I am driving the
> transmit transducers by attatching one of it's leads to RA1 and the
> other to RA2. In my code RA1 is always the opposite of RA2 and I switch
> them at 40kz 20 times, to make an outgoing train of pulses. My reciever
> transducer has one pin to ground and one to a 2 transister amp
> (2n2222's). I am having problems with range, I fear recier amp is not
> strong enough, but if I increase it's gain, I detect ghost (false)
> signal returns. Any suggestions to improve my design? I want a range of
> 2-15 feet accurate within only a foot. Also,does anyone know of a way to
> narrow by field of detection. My current design detect objects off to
> the side.
>
>
>
>
Yes, both Polaroid and Murata Erie have ruggedized units. The Polaroid is a
single unit and the Murata device has separate send and receive transducers.
In both cases you will have to whack them with a lot more power to get the
range you want, but they have much better water / shock / temperature specs.
Also, the units we used a few years ago had a much narrower resonant frequency
band than the indoor types. We also experienced some unit to unit frequency
drifts.
Tom