No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList
Thread
'OT, and the tower of babble.(sic)'
1997\12\17@165016
by
Andrew Mayo
|
I have enjoyed my brief sojourn as a subscriber to this discussion list.
Occasionally, I have even posted the odd message intended to help
someone. Regrettably, I have had to send an unsubscribe request, due to
the large volume of postings.
Many of these involve discussions of issues such as Dutch humour which
could not, even with great charity, be considered remotely relevant to
PIC microcontrollers. Sadly, this is a prevalent problem throughout the
Internet; noise levels just keep rising.
Those of you who do post such blatantly off-topic issues should consider
the day *you* would like some help. All the people who *really* know the
answers will have long gone, leaving you to converse endlessly on the
topic of Dutch humour, perhaps, but certainly not PIC microcontrollers.
I do not know if the answer to this global babble is moderated lists, or
what. Splitting lists into sub-topics fails because often it's not clear
who might be interested.
May I suggest, as an interim measure, the method adopted by radio
amateurs. Every city has one or more 'repeaters'. These accept incoming
calls on a particular frequency, amplify them and re-transmit on an
alternate frequency. It is etiquette to call CQ (who's there, in
essence) on the repeater input channel, and once contact has been made
with one or more people, move to a mutually-agreed frequency, thus
leaving the repeater free once more.
If you want to move off-topic, can't you do something similar?. In which
case, can we have an off-topic list as well; those who like to chat with
others who share an interest in PICs (say) can post to this list. For
example:-
From: Frodo
To: discussion list
I'm having a problem with the 16C84.... blah blah blah..
btw: that reminds me of a great joke about Dutch humour. I'll post to OT
on it.
Or
From: Bilbo
To: discussion list
I need help finding some Philips components. I'll post details to OT;
any replies to OT please.
IMHO this will reduce noise levels substantially; for example, the long
thread on atmospheric electric charges could be pursued at leisure OT.
This may well interest some of us; it would be our choice, though, as to
whether we bothered to pursue the topic.
Technically, *this* post, having raised the topic, would then say
Discussions on this to OT, please.
so if you feel I personally should be pickled in boiling oil for being
such an asshole, you can do so without subjecting the rest of the group
to the ordeal, yet you are still talking to the same potential audience.
Is this practical?
1997\12\17@174423
by
Reginald Neale
|
Andrew Mayo signed off with:
(much snipped)
>
>IMHO this will reduce noise levels substantially; for example, the long
>thread on atmospheric electric charges could be pursued at leisure OT.
>This may well interest some of us; it would be our choice, though, as to
>whether we bothered to pursue the topic.
>
CHOICE is what it's all about. One man's "noise" is another man's music,
and vice versa. It ultimately boils down to this: WHO gets to decide?
Right now, you and I do. If I don't like it, I delete it. If you like it,
you read it.
That's the way it should be. Those who find this arrangement too annoying
to deal with can, do, and should leave.
Many of the more thoughtful contributors to this list are careful to use
the subject line to identify messages that are obviously OT, but nobody's
perfect. If some self-appointed list policeman wants to create a
"noiseless" list, maybe all the posts will be of such high quality that
everyone will flock to it and desert this one. Or not...
/lecture mode OFF.
Reg Neale
1997\12\17@193544
by
)
Reginald Neale wrote:
<snip>
> If some self-appointed list policeman wants to create a
> "noiseless" list, maybe all the posts will be of such high quality
> that
> everyone will flock to it and desert this one. Or not...
>
Or that it would be so utterly boring that (nearly) no one would
subscribe to it!
-Frank
1997\12\19@161343
by
Engineering Department
> May I suggest, as an interim measure, the method adopted by radio
> amateurs. Every city has one or more 'repeaters'. These accept incoming
> calls on a particular frequency, amplify them and re-transmit on an
> alternate frequency. It is etiquette to call CQ (who's there, in
> essence) on the repeater input channel, and once contact has been made
> with one or more people, move to a mutually-agreed frequency, thus
> leaving the repeater free once more.
I've never tried it but I gather one can filter out all subjects
with "OT" in them. The folks on this group are awfully
good about adding the "OT" label. Wouldn't such a filter
do the trick for you?
I hate losing anyone because the PIC group is a pretty
good brain trust.
Cheers,
Win Wiencke
spam_OUTImageLogicTakeThisOuT
ibm.net
'[OT] Re: OT, and the tower of babble.(sic)'
1997\12\21@074111
by
paulb
|
Andrew Mayo wrote:
> May I suggest, as an interim measure, the method adopted by radio
> amateurs. Every city has one or more 'repeaters'. These accept
> incoming calls on a particular frequency, amplify them and re-transmit
> on an alternate frequency. It is etiquette to call CQ (who's there, in
> essence) on the repeater input channel, and once contact has been made
> with one or more people, move to a mutually-agreed frequency, thus
> leaving the repeater free once more.
And may I interject and query as to whether this is used in amateur
radio practice any more than it already is on this list?
The above description is confused. Repeaters are to facilitate
communication between stations not directly accessible to each other.
Their primary justification is to facilitate traffic between mobile
stations. The technique Andrew really wishes to describe is a calling
channel. Repeaters function as calling channels by default as they
become the most popular (yea; ONLY) channels. Stations may or may not
be in a position to swap to another channel as they may need the
repeater for contact. The commonest complaint about the local repeater
up here (rural, mind you) is "It's so dead!".
In fact, the PICLIST already functions as a calling channel, very well
in my experience. Those who don't wish to be heard publically post
direct, those who do, to the list.
All this for the benefit of non-radio-amateurs. I won't be telling
anything novel to active amateurs.
Cheers,
Paul B.
'[OT:] Mindstorm - ir tower'
2004\02\08@214122
by
john chung
Lately I have been trying to get my ir tower to sync with my Nokia
phone. So far,
no success :( I have installed the drivers with comes with this ir
tower. Unfortunately,
it does not enter into the wireless link category found in the "control
panel" of windows.
Anybody has any ideas?
John Chung.
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
2004\02\08@224601
by
Jim Korman
'[OT] Cellphone towers disguised as trees.'
2005\03\03@214059
by
Russell McMahon
Or should this be EE ? :-)
Not done in NZ at all AFAIK
From: "Ken Mardle"
> A website devoted to attempts to disguise cellphone antennae as
> trees:
>
> http://www.fraudfrond.com/
I think this is actually a good idea.
Out of site* is out of mind.
He suggests that 25% of US sites are disguised this way.
RM
* yes, it was.
'[OT] Transmission tower noise'
2006\09\05@234655
by
Jinx
A friend has been giving me grief for some few weeks about
noise she says is coming from a microwave tower about 300m
from her home and keeping her awake in the quiet of the night.
She describes the sound as a constant high-pitched tone. I have
every reason to believe she is not crazy, and she assures me she
has not got tinnitus or any other hearing problems. She may be
dwelling on the problem (though she says she isn't), which might
tend to aggravate any auto-suggestion. I'm getting all this from a
woman who is quite frazzled and cranky after many sleepless night
but who hasn't lost the plot. She's still quite rational about possible
causes, but not being technical at all she has a limited number of
causes to think about. There aren't many houses around where this
tower was put up so she hasn't neighbours to discuss it with
She reckons she's being fobbed off or stonewalled by the owner
of the tower (BCL) and the local council and as she doesn't seem
to be getting anywhere on her own I've offered to try and gather
evidence. Including, if I have to, trying to record the noise to
present to someone as hard evidence. What she has so far are
just opinion and supposition.
I haven't heard the noise myself, she's quite some distance away
and a visit hasn't been possible yet. She said a tech, ISTR, had
suggested (I don't know the circumstances or context of the
conversation) it was 15kHz, which made me think perhaps a
switch-mode with something loose, but the tone she sung over the
phone is nowhere near 15kHz. Probably more like 3/4 the way up
a piano, definitely within almost everyone's hearing range, which
you'd think would be easily heard by anyone. A late-shift engineer
came to her home and thought he kind of heard something, but
seems not in the "my god, how do you sleep with that racket ?"
league or a problem would have been immediately apparent
If the tower is in fact putting out this mysterious tone, I wonder
about a couple of things
(1) Apparently the sound is no louder at the tower. I would have
thought it would be, given the sqrt law unless -
(2) there is some beat frequency being created at her home by
two or more inaudible frequencies, and she just happens to lucky
enough to be at a place where a combination of beat frequency
and distance make a node
Any thoughts ? Any similar experiences ?
2006\09\05@235815
by
Zik Saleeba
A few years ago I used to work beside someone whose old CRT monitor
had a very noisy flyback transformer. The 15kHz noise drove me
absolutely nuts yet no-one else seemed to be able to hear it. I was
always turning the sqealing thing off when she wasn't around.
I haven't had any problems like this for a couple of years. I'd like
to think it's because most monitors are LCD these days, but more
likely as I've got older my hearing doesn't stretch to 15kHz any more.
Cheers,
Zik
On 9/6/06, Jinx <.....joecolquittKILLspam
@spam@clear.net.nz> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> A friend has been giving me grief for some few weeks about
> noise she says is coming from a microwave tower about 300m
> from her home and keeping her awake in the quiet of the night.
> She describes the sound as a constant high-pitched tone. I have
> every reason to believe she is not crazy, and she assures me she
> has not got tinnitus or any other hearing problems. She may be
> dwelling on the problem (though she says she isn't), which might
> tend to aggravate any auto-suggestion. I'm getting all this from a
> woman who is quite frazzled and cranky after many sleepless night
> but who hasn't lost the plot. She's still quite rational about possible
> causes, but not being technical at all she has a limited number of
> causes to think about. There aren't many houses around where this
> tower was put up so she hasn't neighbours to discuss it with
>
> She reckons she's being fobbed off or stonewalled by the owner
> of the tower (BCL) and the local council and as she doesn't seem
> to be getting anywhere on her own I've offered to try and gather
> evidence. Including, if I have to, trying to record the noise to
> present to someone as hard evidence. What she has so far are
> just opinion and supposition.
>
> I haven't heard the noise myself, she's quite some distance away
> and a visit hasn't been possible yet. She said a tech, ISTR, had
> suggested (I don't know the circumstances or context of the
> conversation) it was 15kHz, which made me think perhaps a
> switch-mode with something loose, but the tone she sung over the
> phone is nowhere near 15kHz. Probably more like 3/4 the way up
> a piano, definitely within almost everyone's hearing range, which
> you'd think would be easily heard by anyone. A late-shift engineer
> came to her home and thought he kind of heard something, but
> seems not in the "my god, how do you sleep with that racket ?"
> league or a problem would have been immediately apparent
>
> If the tower is in fact putting out this mysterious tone, I wonder
> about a couple of things
>
> (1) Apparently the sound is no louder at the tower. I would have
> thought it would be, given the sqrt law unless -
>
> (2) there is some beat frequency being created at her home by
> two or more inaudible frequencies, and she just happens to lucky
> enough to be at a place where a combination of beat frequency
> and distance make a node
>
> Any thoughts ? Any similar experiences ?
>
> -
2006\09\06@000445
by
Vasile Surducan
On 9/6/06, Jinx <joecolquitt
KILLspamclear.net.nz> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> A friend has been giving me grief for some few weeks about
> noise she says is coming from a microwave tower about 300m
> from her home and keeping her awake in the quiet of the night.
> She describes the sound as a constant high-pitched tone. I have
> every reason to believe she is not crazy, and she assures me she
> has not got tinnitus or any other hearing problems. She may be
> dwelling on the problem (though she says she isn't), which might
> tend to aggravate any auto-suggestion. I'm getting all this from a
> woman who is quite frazzled and cranky after many sleepless night
> but who hasn't lost the plot. She's still quite rational about possible
> causes, but not being technical at all she has a limited number of
> causes to think about. There aren't many houses around where this
> tower was put up so she hasn't neighbours to discuss it with
>
> She reckons she's being fobbed off or stonewalled by the owner
> of the tower (BCL) and the local council and as she doesn't seem
> to be getting anywhere on her own I've offered to try and gather
> evidence. Including, if I have to, trying to record the noise to
> present to someone as hard evidence. What she has so far are
> just opinion and supposition.
>
> I haven't heard the noise myself, she's quite some distance away
> and a visit hasn't been possible yet. She said a tech, ISTR, had
> suggested (I don't know the circumstances or context of the
> conversation) it was 15kHz, which made me think perhaps a
> switch-mode with something loose, but the tone she sung over the
> phone is nowhere near 15kHz. Probably more like 3/4 the way up
> a piano, definitely within almost everyone's hearing range, which
> you'd think would be easily heard by anyone. A late-shift engineer
> came to her home and thought he kind of heard something, but
> seems not in the "my god, how do you sleep with that racket ?"
> league or a problem would have been immediately apparent
>
> If the tower is in fact putting out this mysterious tone, I wonder
> about a couple of things
>
> (1) Apparently the sound is no louder at the tower. I would have
> thought it would be, given the sqrt law unless -
>
> (2) there is some beat frequency being created at her home by
> two or more inaudible frequencies, and she just happens to lucky
> enough to be at a place where a combination of beat frequency
> and distance make a node
>
> Any thoughts ? Any similar experiences ?
You need a spectrum analyzer and a large band antenna.
Perform a check first in her room. If you found energy levels bigger
than -30dBm or so, it's possible that your friend has a sensitive
detection problem (possible a teeth problem). I know stories in which
the person received the radio program in his head . Almost mad he
finally visit his stomatologist and the problem was solved by a simple
replacement of the material from his damaged tooth.
Vasile
2006\09\06@001713
by
Jinx
> A few years ago I used to work beside someone whose old
> CRT monitor had a very noisy flyback transformer
I had a TV like that. At some places in the room the whine
was very noticeable, at other places hardly audible, which
is what makes me wonder if there's some nodal to component
to this noise
2006\09\06@001858
by
Jinx
> it's possible that your friend has a sensitive detection problem
> (possible a teeth problem)
Thanks Vasile, I'll mention that to her. She's open to any and
all suggestions
2006\09\06@002106
by
Russell McMahon
There have been cases which seem to be legitimate of people
demodulating RF in their bodies.
It is commonly reported that incoming meteorites are sometimes "heard"
by some people. (Is that indefinite enough :-) ). If this is not a
psychological generation of apparent audio by visual stimulus then it
*must* be caused by perception of RF signals as the sound path from
the events in the very high atmosphere, if there was one, would take
vastly longer than the viewing time.
Russell
>A friend has been giving me grief for some few weeks about
> noise she says is coming from a microwave tower about 300m
> from her home and keeping her awake in the quiet of the night.
2006\09\06@002106
by
Russell McMahon
> You need a spectrum analyzer and a large band antenna.
> Perform a check first in her room. If you found energy levels bigger
> than -30dBm or so, it's possible that your friend has a sensitive
> detection problem (possible a teeth problem). I know stories in
> which
> the person received the radio program in his head . Almost mad he
> finally visit his stomatologist and the problem was solved by a
> simple
> replacement of the material from his damaged tooth.
I can lend you a spectrum analyser of sorts if you get that far.
Russell
2006\09\06@002307
by
Mike Singer
Jinx wrote:
> A friend has been giving me grief for some
> few weeks about noise she says is coming
> from a microwave tower about 300m from
> her home
I'm sure she is not able to determine the direction of the ultrasound,
until, of course, she is a bat.
I am not about getting into RF version here.
Most probably the sound is emitting inside her house.
It could be some old swollen battery or accumulator (say, from
cellphone) emitting air through the micro-hole or something similar.
It's hard but still possible to locate the aprox place in the room
where sound is at max amplitude on average. Here she is to seek the
little screaming creature.
Regards,
MS
2006\09\06@003527
by
Cris Wilson
|
> (1) Apparently the sound is no louder at the tower. I would have
> thought it would be, given the sqrt law unless -
>
> (2) there is some beat frequency being created at her home by
> two or more inaudible frequencies, and she just happens to lucky
> enough to be at a place where a combination of beat frequency
> and distance make a node
>
> Any thoughts ? Any similar experiences ?
I've seen two cases close to this one.
The first was finally tracked down to a bad power transformer
across the street from me. It finally blew up and they replaced
it and the obnoxious whining that apparently only I could hear
went away.
The second involved a crystal vase that would start "humming" at
precisely the same time every night (2:13am) when a freight train
was passing about 7 miles away. I could barely hear the train, but
that **** vase would wake me up every night. I tried moving the vase
around in the house and setting it on different types of material to
dampen the humming, but it just wouldn't go away. I finally took a
baseball bat to the vase - my wife was pretty mad, but at least it
never woke me up again.
I've heard of people complaining about noises that only "they can
hear" and it finally being tracked down to monitors, TVs, fluorescent
light ballasts, air conditioner compressor bearings, and attic vent
fan bearings. Tracking the noise down just took persistence.
Good luck
--
Cris Wilson
Information Resource Consultant
College of Architecture, Arts, and Humanities
Clemson University
.....crisKILLspam
.....clemson.edu
2006\09\06@003538
by
Zik Saleeba
Get her to switch off the power to her house and see if the sound
disappears. It's a quick test and will quickly narrow it down to "us"
or "them".
Cheers,
Zik
On 9/6/06, Mike Singer <EraseMEznatokspam_OUT
TakeThisOuTgmail.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> Jinx wrote:
> > A friend has been giving me grief for some
> > few weeks about noise she says is coming
> > from a microwave tower about 300m from
> > her home
>
> I'm sure she is not able to determine the direction of the ultrasound,
> until, of course, she is a bat.
> I am not about getting into RF version here.
>
> Most probably the sound is emitting inside her house.
> It could be some old swollen battery or accumulator (say, from
> cellphone) emitting air through the micro-hole or something similar.
> It's hard but still possible to locate the aprox place in the room
> where sound is at max amplitude on average. Here she is to seek the
> little screaming creature.
>
> Regards,
> MS
> -
2006\09\06@004624
by
David VanHorn
|
>
>
> It is commonly reported that incoming meteorites are sometimes "heard"
> by some people. (Is that indefinite enough :-) ). If this is not a
> psychological generation of apparent audio by visual stimulus then it
> *must* be caused by perception of RF signals as the sound path from
> the events in the very high atmosphere, if there was one, would take
> vastly longer than the viewing time.
I can speak to that.
Two friends and I were crossing the bridge in iroquois point, Oahu, Hawaii,
at about 9 or 10 PM.
It was completely dark, and we all three heard a noise we couldn't identify,
and were looking around, for about a second, then a bolide appeared,
crossing from east of us to north of us.
The light was bright enough to cast a shadow, a bright green. The noise was
sort of a sizzling, not loud.
We went to the seismic observatory in Ewa Beach as soon as we could, maybe
30 mins on bike, but they did not register any impact. We didn't see it
come down, and concluded that it either burned up, or skipped back out of
the atmosphere.
Interestingly, there were no reports in the paper, and apparently few others
noticed it.
2006\09\06@005623
by
David VanHorn
|
On 9/6/06, David VanHorn <dvanhorn
spam_OUTmicrobrix.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}>
>
> > It is commonly reported that incoming meteorites are sometimes "heard"
> > by some people. (Is that indefinite enough :-) ). If this is not a
> > psychological generation of apparent audio by visual stimulus then it
> > *must* be caused by perception of RF signals as the sound path from
> > the events in the very high atmosphere, if there was one, would take
> > vastly longer than the viewing time.
>
>
>
> I can speak to that.
>
> Two friends and I were crossing the bridge in iroquois point, Oahu,
> Hawaii, at about 9 or 10 PM.
> It was completely dark, and we all three heard a noise we couldn't
> identify, and were looking around, for about a second, then a bolide
> appeared, crossing from east of us to north of us.
> The light was bright enough to cast a shadow, a bright green. The noise
> was sort of a sizzling, not loud.
>
>
Pull up google earth, and go to 21 deg 19' 25.36N and 157 deg, 58'
37.57Wand you'll see where we were. Elevation about 40 degrees,
started to the
east of us, and ended near north, and maybe 30 degrees elevation.
2006\09\06@010215
by
Russell McMahon
Are you sure the sound is continuous - sometimes what people convey in
their description isn't what they intend to. (eg "Makes a high pitched
noise all the time" may mean eg "... in a burst every 5 minutes
without fail."
If it's an occasional chirp, try looking for a smoke alarm with a low
battery. It really does happen that people fail to realise what makes
this noise.
Russell
2006\09\06@032518
by
Russell McMahon
> Get her to switch off the power to her house and see if the sound
> disappears. It's a quick test and will quickly narrow it down to
> "us"
> or "them".
As long as it's mains powered, and not something like my (failing)
battery smoke alarm.
Russell
2006\09\06@040231
by
Alan B. Pearce
>A few years ago I used to work beside someone whose old CRT
>monitor had a very noisy flyback transformer. The 15kHz noise
>drove me absolutely nuts yet no-one else seemed to be able
>to hear it. I was always turning the sqealing thing off when
>she wasn't around.
That typically happens when a component has "sorta failed" and the output
stage waveform isn't exactly what it should be.
>I haven't had any problems like this for a couple of years.
>I'd like to think it's because most monitors are LCD these
>days, but more likely as I've got older my hearing doesn't
>stretch to 15kHz any more.
We have an LCD monitor around here that does it.
The problem with this sort of noise seems to be components in a flyback
stage which either have a combined component tolerance across the whole item
which makes the operating waveform non-optimal, or a component fails in a
manner which allows the circuit to still operate, but again the operating
waveform is non-optimal, but not badly enough out of spec to cause major
failure of other components. Almost anything that does high voltage
conversion seems to be susceptible to this - CRT output stages, LCD
backlight units and switchmode power supplies all seem to be capable of
doing it.
But Jinxs' original problem (or more correctly his friends problem) could be
caused by bolt corrosion on the tower rectifying RF, and producing either an
audio sound, or having a high enough voltage across the corrosion to have an
arc, although I suspect the latter would require such an RF field that any
person in the vicinity would have a distinctly warm feeling all over.
Another alternative may be metal joints within her house (- does it have a
galvanised iron roof?) doing the same thing. I have heard of bed springs
rectifying signals from AM radio stations, as well as metal tooth fillings
causing problems when cracked. The last one should be easily verifiable by
going to another place with high RF fields - get her to visit you Jinx and
go for a drive along scenic drive through the ranges behind you, past
another BCL tower ;).
And finally, it is not something silly like the noise of the wind blowing
through the tower (any nearby trees cut down recently to allow this to
happen)? I doubt this, as I get the impression the noise is constant, and
this would vary according to wind speed. It would also be lower frequency
than suggested, but still worth a consideration, ad be eliminated as a
source.
Another possibility - is it really coming from the tower? It could be coming
from the fuse board, and be due to a ground fault condition, causing ground
currents from neighbouring consumers to come down the neutral and then to
ground through her fuse board. Especially if there is a 3 phase consumer
nearby (I get the impression she is in the country, so a neighbouring farm
may well have 3 phase for a milking shed or other plant) and that can create
a 600Hz buzz which could sound like she suggests. It could even be the power
to the transmitter site itself, that would almost certainly be 3 phase, and
could well be higher than the 230V, which might mean arcing on the
insulators in wet weather ... you lot have been having an inordinate amount
of floods etc recently.
2006\09\06@060029
by
Jinx
> Get her to switch off the power to her house and see if the
> sound disappears. It's a quick test and will quickly narrow
> it down to "us" or "them"
She tried that quite early on, and it made no difference
> But Jinxs' original problem (or more correctly his friends
> problem) could be caused by bolt corrosion on the tower
The tower has been there for just a few months, so that's
unlikely, but not impossible. That it is a recent structure and
she had no problems before is another reason I think she's on
to something. We just have to figure out what the "something"
is
> Another alternative may be metal joints within her house (- does
> it have a galvanised iron roof?) doing the same thing
Will ask
> I have heard of bed springs rectifying signals from AM radio
> stations
And here's me buying a tuner like a sucker
> as well as metal tooth fillings causing problems when cracked
She has had dental work recently, notably having almagam
fillings removed and replaced with composite
> The last one should be easily verifiable by going to another
> place with high RF fields - get her to visit you Jinx and go for
> a drive along scenic drive through the ranges behind you, past
> another BCL tower ;)
> Another possibility - is it really coming from the tower?
Two suggestions I put to her. This list has really honed my
investigative process. Assume nothing about what the complainant
"says" it is
I asked her if she experienced this around any other tower, and
lord knows there are plenty of them. She said no, and will try it.
Whether I get a love-struck ride with an attractive single blonde
(-ish) Swede is something I was working on anyway ;-)
> It could be coming from the fuse board, and be due to a ground
> fault condition, causing ground currents from neighbouring
> consumers to come down the neutral and then to
I thought of perhaps buried cables, could be power or data, or
even someone in the area (she's not completely remote) who may
leave a faulty monitor on at night
One suggestion I gave her was to look at some sort of Faraday
cage. Some quick way of isolating herself from the RF to see if
that is what is really causing the problem. We discussed what
might be a suitable experiment, and came up with a grounded
panel van and aluminium foil. Whether this will be practical, I
don't know, but she's at straw-clutching stage. Was careful to
stay away from tin-foil hats and the wearers thereof, but if she
got a good night's sleep I actually think she might up for it
2006\09\06@062033
by
Gus S Calabrese
^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear plugs and
some wrap around headgear.
If the sound does not attenuate, it is in her head. ( Physically or
psychologically )
How far away from the antenna must she get to lose the audio ?
AGSC^
On 2006-Sep 05, at 21:46hrs PM, Jinx wrote:
A friend has been giving me grief for some few weeks about
noise she says is coming from a microwave tower about 300m
from her home and keeping her awake in the quiet of the night.
She describes the sound as a constant high-pitched tone. I have
every reason to believe she is not crazy, and she assures me she
has not got tinnitus or any other hearing problems. She may be
dwelling on the problem (though she says she isn't), which might
tend to aggravate any auto-suggestion. I'm getting all this from a
woman who is quite frazzled and cranky after many sleepless night
but who hasn't lost the plot. She's still quite rational about possible
causes, but not being technical at all she has a limited number of
causes to think about. There aren't many houses around where this
tower was put up so she hasn't neighbours to discuss it with
She reckons she's being fobbed off or stonewalled by the owner
of the tower (BCL) and the local council and as she doesn't seem
to be getting anywhere on her own I've offered to try and gather
evidence. Including, if I have to, trying to record the noise to
present to someone as hard evidence. What she has so far are
just opinion and supposition.
I haven't heard the noise myself, she's quite some distance away
and a visit hasn't been possible yet. She said a tech, ISTR, had
suggested (I don't know the circumstances or context of the
conversation) it was 15kHz, which made me think perhaps a
switch-mode with something loose, but the tone she sung over the
phone is nowhere near 15kHz. Probably more like 3/4 the way up
a piano, definitely within almost everyone's hearing range, which
you'd think would be easily heard by anyone. A late-shift engineer
came to her home and thought he kind of heard something, but
seems not in the "my god, how do you sleep with that racket ?"
league or a problem would have been immediately apparent
If the tower is in fact putting out this mysterious tone, I wonder
about a couple of things
(1) Apparently the sound is no louder at the tower. I would have
thought it would be, given the sqrt law unless -
(2) there is some beat frequency being created at her home by
two or more inaudible frequencies, and she just happens to lucky
enough to be at a place where a combination of beat frequency
and distance make a node
Any thoughts ? Any similar experiences ?
2006\09\06@063837
by
Alan B. Pearce
>> It could be coming from the fuse board, and be due to a ground
>> fault condition, causing ground currents from neighbouring
>> consumers to come down the neutral and then to
>
>I thought of perhaps buried cables, could be power or data, or
>even someone in the area (she's not completely remote) who may
>leave a faulty monitor on at night
The reason I mentioned this one was an experience my parents had, where the
power pole supplying them and a neighbour was mounted on a bank outside the
houses, and as the bank slumped the neighbours power cable stretched, and in
due course the neutral broke, but the phase was still connected. My father
had been wondering why his distribution box made all sorts of buzzing
noises, and presumably a heap of other neighbours had the same problem,
probably without realising it, as this neighbours return current made its
way through the multiple earth returns back to the power supply.
Eventually the pole leant far enough for the phase to break (with a shower
of sparks, I remember seeing it happen), and after the power board repaired
the connection the noises from our distribution box went away.
2006\09\06@064754
by
Jinx
> ^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
> of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear
> plugs and some wrap around headgear
She has tried earplugs + earmuffs, no joy
Also, most people will find that you get used to a constant noise. She's
tried music and white noise (one of those "subliminal message" ***
tapes with the waves and the seagulls") to try and block it out
Unfortunately that wasn't a complete success because the only tape
she could find was a New Agey one with a choir and other
distractions. I could make a white noise CD or mp3 though, that
hadn't occurred to me until now
> How far away from the antenna must she get to lose the audio ?
Good question. Don't know. Poor answer
Having another chat with her tomorrow
*** not the "You will hear an irritating and inescapable tone" one ;-)
2006\09\06@070231
by
Gus S Calabrese
^ If ear protection does not work, it must be in her head.
Explain how that cannot be so. High pitched audio is
blocked by ear protection.
AGSC ^
On 2006-Sep 06, at 04:47hrs AM, Jinx wrote:
> ^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
> of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear
> plugs and some wrap around headgear
She has tried earplugs + earmuffs, no joy
Also, most people will find that you get used to a constant noise. She's
tried music and white noise (one of those "subliminal message" ***
tapes with the waves and the seagulls") to try and block it out
Unfortunately that wasn't a complete success because the only tape
she could find was a New Agey one with a choir and other
distractions. I could make a white noise CD or mp3 though, that
hadn't occurred to me until now
> How far away from the antenna must she get to lose the audio ?
Good question. Don't know. Poor answer
Having another chat with her tomorrow
*** not the "You will hear an irritating and inescapable tone" one ;-)
-
2006\09\06@073005
by
Jinx
> ^ If ear protection does not work, it must be in her head.
> Explain how that cannot be so. High pitched audio is
> blocked by ear protection.
Yes, exactly, I've explained to her that treble noise is quite
easily attenuated, so that seems to have been at least partly
ruled out, although she is adamant she can hear "something".
I'm just as curious and eager as she is to get to the bottom
of it because it's causing her some distress
2006\09\06@073131
by
Lee Jones
> Are you sure the sound is continuous
>
> If it's an occasional chirp, try looking for a smoke alarm
> with a low battery
About six months ago, my son found a long standing "fan noise".
For quite a while, I had heard a faint "cooling fan going bad"
noise coming from a collection of disk drives. It was loudest
in the doorway but I was never able to track it to a specific
fan. I thought I'd find it when it got worse.
Turns out my wife's exercise bicycle (between doorway & disks)
has an LCD module. It makes a really faint bad fan noise -- for
a long time -- if the batteries are at mid-power levels. Module
appears fine & works normally. When the batteries do finally
start to fail, the module makes a normal "dead battery" loud
chirpy noise that's easy to find.
When we took the batteries out of the bike's LCD module, I found
that the faint bad fan noise was gone.
As someone else said, sometimes it just take persistence (& luck).
Lee Jones
2006\09\06@074051
by
Dennis Crawley
Jinx <@spam@joecolquittKILLspam
clear.net.nz> wrote:
>> ^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
>> of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear
>> plugs and some wrap around headgear
>
> She has tried earplugs + earmuffs, no joy
>
Hypertension?
May be her blood pressure is fooling she.
Many people get confused about high-pitched sounds.
They came from the hearing system itself and paranoia makes the sound come
from the tower. Tell her to try to sleep in a very quiet and far away place,
for a few days.
(physician-audiometry-therapy)
Dennis
2006\09\06@081741
by
Jinx
> Hypertension?
> May be her blood pressure is fooling she.
> Many people get confused about high-pitched sounds
I'm reluctant to suggest again to her that it's "all in the mind"
or has an indirect physical cause. For one thing I don't want
to jeopardise the friendship and a possible future business
partnership by asking something that's already been answered.
The other thing too is that I don't want my face splattered with
an indignant "I told you so" if it does prove to be a technical
cause
2006\09\06@082717
by
Ling SM
>>>^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
>>>of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear
>>>plugs and some wrap around headgear
>>
>>She has tried earplugs + earmuffs, no joy
>>
>
>
> Hypertension?
> May be her blood pressure is fooling she.
> Many people get confused about high-pitched sounds.
> They came from the hearing system itself and paranoia makes the sound come
> from the tower. Tell her to try to sleep in a very quiet and far away place,
> for a few days.
>
If that is so, she can try to see Chinese physician. There are several
type to massages to treat different type of ringings in the ear.
Ling SM
2006\09\06@085224
by
John Ferrell
Google "Taos Hum". It might be related.
The hypothesis that I have reached is that the noise does not exist at its
perceived frequency. Rather, it is similar to "intermodulation" in a radio
receiver... the product of mixing two or more signals.
It is very real to those who hear it but totally undetectable to those who
cannot.
There is a local condition here that some find annoying and others cannot
detect it. It is neither constant or the same intensity in the affected
area. I cannot hear it but it has been described as similar to the sound
made by the Star Wars Light Sabers.
Since we have been in the low sunspot activity, I have not been made aware
of the condition. Of course one must consider that inquiring about such
things does raise a few eyebrows.
John Ferrell W8CCW
"My Competition is not my enemy"
http://DixieNC.US
{Original Message removed}
2006\09\06@091825
by
Dennis Crawley
|
Jinx <KILLspamjoecolquittKILLspam
clear.net.nz> wrote:
>> Hypertension?
>> May be her blood pressure is fooling she.
>> Many people get confused about high-pitched sounds
>
> I'm reluctant to suggest again to her that it's "all in the mind"
> or has an indirect physical cause. For one thing I don't want
> to jeopardise the friendship and a possible future business
> partnership by asking something that's already been answered.
> The other thing too is that I don't want my face splattered with
> an indignant "I told you so" if it does prove to be a technical
> cause
Work the problem.
It is more simple to discard by simple tests her hearing system and blood
pressure failures than make 433Mhz notch filter to be applied in her molars
or frontal lobe.
Besides, you can be the one who makes the Ling SM massages. :)
More serious:
She is the only good "receptor" you have.
Block the receptor.
Make a Faraday jail if it is RF. Ground her house.
Make a reject audio frequencies helmet.
Quantifies all.
2006\09\06@094426
by
Russell McMahon
Very serious suggestion - has tinnitus been eliminated?
Very real.
Can be very disturbing. Level can vary markedly.
Worst case examples have driven people to suicide but this is very
rare.
My wife has it constantly. I get it on occasions - not usually very
badly. In my case I suspect a mild infection may be a trigger.
If treated at initial onset in some cases it can be prevented from
becoming permanent. Once well established you have it for life.
Russell
2006\09\06@094538
by
William Couture
On 9/6/06, Dennis Crawley <RemoveMEdennis.crawleyTakeThisOuT
usa.net> wrote:
> Jinx <spamBeGonejoecolquittspamBeGone
clear.net.nz> wrote:
> >> ^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
> >> of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear
> >> plugs and some wrap around headgear
> >
> > She has tried earplugs + earmuffs, no joy
> >
>
> Hypertension?
> May be her blood pressure is fooling she.
> Many people get confused about high-pitched sounds.
> They came from the hearing system itself and paranoia makes the sound come
> from the tower. Tell her to try to sleep in a very quiet and far away place,
> for a few days.
Caffine, such as in chocolate and coffee, can also cause ringing in the ears.
Bill
--
Psst... Hey, you... Buddy... Want a kitten? straycatblues.petfinder.org
2006\09\06@095756
by
Marcel Duchamp
Jinx wrote:
>
> Any thoughts ? Any similar experiences ?
>
Post some photos of her here, all the better for us to examine the
situation more closely.
2006\09\06@101539
by
Robert Rolf
|
How about K.I.S.S.?
Earplugs or industrial noise suppression ear muffs at night.
Cheap to try and see if the sound is external to her head.
e.g. RF vs acoustic.
Jinx wrote:
{Quote hidden}>>Get her to switch off the power to her house and see if the
>>sound disappears. It's a quick test and will quickly narrow
>>it down to "us" or "them"
>
>
> She tried that quite early on, and it made no difference
>
>
>>But Jinxs' original problem (or more correctly his friends
>>problem) could be caused by bolt corrosion on the tower
>
>
> The tower has been there for just a few months, so that's
> unlikely, but not impossible. That it is a recent structure and
> she had no problems before is another reason I think she's on
> to something. We just have to figure out what the "something"
> is
>
>
>>Another alternative may be metal joints within her house (- does
>>it have a galvanised iron roof?) doing the same thing
>
>
> Will ask
>
>
>>I have heard of bed springs rectifying signals from AM radio
>>stations
>
>
> And here's me buying a tuner like a sucker
>
>
>>as well as metal tooth fillings causing problems when cracked
>
>
> She has had dental work recently, notably having almagam
> fillings removed and replaced with composite
>
>
>>The last one should be easily verifiable by going to another
>>place with high RF fields - get her to visit you Jinx and go for
>>a drive along scenic drive through the ranges behind you, past
>>another BCL tower ;)
>
>
>>Another possibility - is it really coming from the tower?
>
>
> Two suggestions I put to her. This list has really honed my
> investigative process. Assume nothing about what the complainant
> "says" it is
>
> I asked her if she experienced this around any other tower, and
> lord knows there are plenty of them. She said no, and will try it.
> Whether I get a love-struck ride with an attractive single blonde
> (-ish) Swede is something I was working on anyway ;-)
>
>
>>It could be coming from the fuse board, and be due to a ground
>>fault condition, causing ground currents from neighbouring
>>consumers to come down the neutral and then to
>
>
> I thought of perhaps buried cables, could be power or data, or
> even someone in the area (she's not completely remote) who may
> leave a faulty monitor on at night
>
> One suggestion I gave her was to look at some sort of Faraday
> cage. Some quick way of isolating herself from the RF to see if
> that is what is really causing the problem. We discussed what
> might be a suitable experiment, and came up with a grounded
> panel van and aluminium foil. Whether this will be practical, I
> don't know, but she's at straw-clutching stage. Was careful to
> stay away from tin-foil hats and the wearers thereof, but if she
> got a good night's sleep I actually think she might up for it
>
2006\09\06@102303
by
David VanHorn
>
>
> My wife has it constantly. I get it on occasions - not usually very
> badly. In my case I suspect a mild infection may be a trigger.
> If treated at initial onset in some cases it can be prevented from
> becoming permanent. Once well established you have it for life.
Yup.. I've got that. A high pitched hissy noise that's with me 24/7.
I also get (and have since I can remember) individual high pitched noises
that will last for maybe 15 seconds, starting fairly loud, then tapering to
nothing.
2006\09\06@103437
by
Howard Winter
Russell,
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:19:08 +1200, Russell McMahon wrote:
> There have been cases which seem to be legitimate of people
> demodulating RF in their bodies.
And it could be resonating in her skull - in which case nobody else will hear it unless they are in head-to-head contact.
> It is commonly reported that incoming meteorites are sometimes "heard"
> by some people. (Is that indefinite enough :-) ). If this is not a
> psychological generation of apparent audio by visual stimulus then it
> *must* be caused by perception of RF signals as the sound path from
> the events in the very high atmosphere, if there was one, would take
> vastly longer than the viewing time.
I have heard this myself - a sort-of "Whoosh" noise as a meteor passes over. A bit like the noise a firework rocket makes as it ascends, but the
sound doesn't seem to travel across the sky with the meteor, and there's no doppler effect - it's just "there", for about half a second. It doesn't
always happen, but it certainly *does* happen!
Cheers,
Howard Winter
St.Albans, England
2006\09\06@104741
by
Howard Winter
Jinx,
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:30:00 +1200, Jinx wrote:
> > ^ If ear protection does not work, it must be in her head.
> > Explain how that cannot be so. High pitched audio is
> > blocked by ear protection.
>
> Yes, exactly, I've explained to her that treble noise is quite
> easily attenuated, so that seems to have been at least partly
> ruled out, although she is adamant she can hear "something".
> I'm just as curious and eager as she is to get to the bottom
> of it because it's causing her some distress
Are you/she certain it's not tinnitus? Does it stop when she's away from home? If yes/yes, then it must be a resonance in her head. Break out the
tinfoil hat! :-)
Cheers,
Howard Winter
St.Albans, England
2006\09\06@110040
by
Bob Axtell
Russell McMahon wrote:
> Very serious suggestion - has tinnitus been eliminated?
> Very real.
> Can be very disturbing. Level can vary markedly.
> Worst case examples have driven people to suicide but this is very
> rare.
>
> My wife has it constantly. I get it on occasions - not usually very
> badly. In my case I suspect a mild infection may be a trigger.
> If treated at initial onset in some cases it can be prevented from
> becoming permanent. Once well established you have it for life.
>
>
> Russell
>
>
We have mountains around here (so AZ) that jut into the sky at 7000',
and are frequently the
targets of climbers. A few have said that up there, in the stillness of
the top, that some hear a
constant humming sound, similar to the TAOS HUM (gargoyle it for info).
My ears are fading with age and a high level of meanness, so I can't
hear anything. Not even my
wife.
--Bob
2006\09\06@111236
by
Gerhard Fiedler
Jinx wrote:
>> How far away from the antenna must she get to lose the audio ?
>
> Good question. Don't know. Poor answer
Another question... Only inside the house, or also around the house?
Blindfold her or have her close the eyes to make her focus on the ears
(blindfolding is better) and walk her around, trying to get some idea of
when it gets stronger and when it gets weaker.
Maybe a good microphone and an audio spectrum analyzer help?
Gerhard
2006\09\06@114240
by
Ling SM
|
>>My wife has it constantly. I get it on occasions - not usually very
>>badly. In my case I suspect a mild infection may be a trigger.
>>If treated at initial onset in some cases it can be prevented from
>>becoming permanent. Once well established you have it for life.
>
>
>
>
> Yup.. I've got that. A high pitched hissy noise that's with me 24/7.
>
> I also get (and have since I can remember) individual high pitched noises
> that will last for maybe 15 seconds, starting fairly loud, then tapering to
> nothing.
According to a medical show on Chinese medicine here that was run 2 -3
year back, most of the causes of the ringing in the ear are not in the
head nor in the ear. Noise in the ear is the result as the ear is an
organ sensitive enough to pickup the imbalance (EE term = oscillation).
They originate from weak organ - kidney and region around there. They
can be cured or improved through routine massages and heat treatment on
the body.
I am no Chinese physician, so don't take my words seriously.
Ling SM
2006\09\06@120440
by
Russell McMahon
|
> We have mountains around here (so AZ) that jut into the sky at
> 7000',
> and are frequently the
> targets of climbers. A few have said that up there, in the stillness
> of
> the top, that some hear a
> constant humming sound, similar to the TAOS HUM (gargoyle it for
> info).
Taos Hum home page (of course)
Vast amounts of info plus links to related (and unrelated) sites
http://amasci.com/hum/hum1.html
Good commentary
Gets a bit 'waffly' but covers the subject
http://www.crystalinks.com/taoshum.html
Brief but useful
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taos_Hum
Ho Hum !!!
http://www.google.co.nz/search?hl=en&q=taos+hum&meta=
I've met the super double sized with fries version of this.
Take two diesel locomotives
At 5am ish on a winter morning place both in an engine shed and start
their motors.
Set governors of each to exactly the same engine revs.
Natural differences will cause a beat frequency between the two
engines.
Engine shed will sum air pressure waves and produce a high amplitude
somewhat subsonic signal.
Whump a Whump a Whump a .....
You just TRY and sleep through that when you live perhaps 100 yards
away :-)
We learned to after a while.
Russell
2006\09\06@121956
by
Alan B. Pearce
>Set governors of each to exactly the same engine revs.
>Natural differences will cause a beat frequency between
>the two engines.
>Engine shed will sum air pressure waves and produce a
>high amplitude somewhat subsonic signal.
>Whump a Whump a Whump a .....
I have experienced something similar during the day with a single engine. It
was idling along as it went past my grandfathers house, but you couldn't
hear it, but you could sure feel the air pressure change. I suspect the
engine was idling with the absolute minimum of fuel combustion to keep it
idling over, and this meant the thing was behaving as an air pump, and not
making any noticeable exhaust noise.
2006\09\06@122927
by
Michael Rigby-Jones
|
{Quote hidden}>-----Original Message-----
>From:
TakeThisOuTpiclist-bouncesEraseME
spam_OUTmit.edu [
RemoveMEpiclist-bounces
TakeThisOuTmit.edu]
>Sent: 06 September 2006 17:20
>To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
>Subject: Re: [OT] Transmission tower noise
>
>
>>Set governors of each to exactly the same engine revs.
>>Natural differences will cause a beat frequency between
>>the two engines.
>>Engine shed will sum air pressure waves and produce a
>>high amplitude somewhat subsonic signal.
>>Whump a Whump a Whump a .....
>
>I have experienced something similar during the day with a
>single engine. It was idling along as it went past my
>grandfathers house, but you couldn't hear it, but you could
>sure feel the air pressure change. I suspect the engine was
>idling with the absolute minimum of fuel combustion to keep it
>idling over, and this meant the thing was behaving as an air
>pump, and not making any noticeable exhaust noise.
Possibly it was resonance (e.g. between two buildings) and you happened to have you head at one of the peak pressure nodes. It's quite uncomfortable in one room of my house if a car is waiting outside with it engine idling at the wrong speed, the whole room resonates, windows rattle etc.
Regards
Mike
=======================================================================
This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only. The
information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must
not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any
person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have
received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use,
forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
No part of this message can be considered a request for goods or
services.
=======================================================================
2006\09\06@123440
by
M. Adam Davis
You might try using a piezo microphone to see if her head is vibrating
in response to some external noise. Have her bite hard in it and not
move, record through the human hearing range, and then play it back to
her loudly while running it through a software filter to see if you
can pick out the frequency.
If earplugs don't work, and her head isn't vibrating, then I don't see
a way the cilia in the ear are moving, meaning that there's no audio
component, even though she percieves it as an audio annoyance.
Since it's localized to the tower, then I'd suuggest having her spend
a week at a friend's house away from the tower and see if it occurs at
other locations/times. If not, then probably the best option is to
move - it's going to take longer and be more aggravating to get the
tower people to change than it's worth.
If she does have the problem at other times/places, then it becomes
interestingly more complex.
-Adam
On 9/6/06, Jinx <joecolquittEraseME
.....clear.net.nz> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> > ^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
> > of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear
> > plugs and some wrap around headgear
>
> She has tried earplugs + earmuffs, no joy
>
> Also, most people will find that you get used to a constant noise. She's
> tried music and white noise (one of those "subliminal message" ***
> tapes with the waves and the seagulls") to try and block it out
>
> Unfortunately that wasn't a complete success because the only tape
> she could find was a New Agey one with a choir and other
> distractions. I could make a white noise CD or mp3 though, that
> hadn't occurred to me until now
>
> > How far away from the antenna must she get to lose the audio ?
>
> Good question. Don't know. Poor answer
>
> Having another chat with her tomorrow
>
> *** not the "You will hear an irritating and inescapable tone" one ;-)
>
> -
2006\09\06@123724
by
M. Adam Davis
When I say spend a week away, I mean to completely and utterly avoid
the tower and area during this time. Just like medicine it takes
awhile for the body to recover from a long term annoyance. It may be
that after a short time away it'll disappear, then when she returns
it'll take a few days to reappear, which could indicate other
environmental factors (chemicals, fumes, etc.
Treat it as a holiday.
-Adam
On 9/6/06, M. Adam Davis <EraseMEstienman
gmail.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> You might try using a piezo microphone to see if her head is vibrating
> in response to some external noise. Have her bite hard in it and not
> move, record through the human hearing range, and then play it back to
> her loudly while running it through a software filter to see if you
> can pick out the frequency.
>
> If earplugs don't work, and her head isn't vibrating, then I don't see
> a way the cilia in the ear are moving, meaning that there's no audio
> component, even though she percieves it as an audio annoyance.
>
> Since it's localized to the tower, then I'd suuggest having her spend
> a week at a friend's house away from the tower and see if it occurs at
> other locations/times. If not, then probably the best option is to
> move - it's going to take longer and be more aggravating to get the
> tower people to change than it's worth.
>
> If she does have the problem at other times/places, then it becomes
> interestingly more complex.
>
> -Adam
>
> On 9/6/06, Jinx <
RemoveMEjoecolquittEraseME
EraseMEclear.net.nz> wrote:
> > > ^If it is high pitched then it can be attenuated by a good set
> > > of ear protection. Preferably a combination of expanding ear
> > > plugs and some wrap around headgear
> >
> > She has tried earplugs + earmuffs, no joy
> >
> > Also, most people will find that you get used to a constant noise. She's
> > tried music and white noise (one of those "subliminal message" ***
> > tapes with the waves and the seagulls") to try and block it out
> >
> > Unfortunately that wasn't a complete success because the only tape
> > she could find was a New Agey one with a choir and other
> > distractions. I could make a white noise CD or mp3 though, that
> > hadn't occurred to me until now
> >
> > > How far away from the antenna must she get to lose the audio ?
> >
> > Good question. Don't know. Poor answer
> >
> > Having another chat with her tomorrow
> >
> > *** not the "You will hear an irritating and inescapable tone" one ;-)
> >
> > --
2006\09\06@224740
by
Josh Koffman
On 9/6/06, Russell McMahon <RemoveMEapptechspam_OUT
KILLspamparadise.net.nz> wrote:
> I can lend you a spectrum analyser of sorts if you get that far.
"Of sorts"? Sounds intriguing coming from you Russell...do tell!
:)
Josh
--
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools.
-Douglas Adams
2006\09\07@035712
by
Russell McMahon
>> I can lend you a spectrum analyser of sorts if you get that far.
> "Of sorts"? Sounds intriguing coming from you Russell...do tell!
Based on a kitset. (DSE based on EA I think)
"Some years" old.
Uses a TV tuner as RF head.
Works reasonably well.
RM
2006\09\07@044258
by
Jinx
My friend Gina thanks you all very much and sincerely and
hopes you have long and happy lives. She assures you she
does not live with 30 cats, some dead, does not spend hours
cackling in the rocking chair she hasn't got and is not a tin-can-
hoarding, newspaper-collecting loony
To answer some questions -
Low intake of caffeine (generally health conscious)
Does not self-medicate
Has no pins in bones or a metal plate in the noggin
Is sure there's nothing wrong with her hearing, but has taken
this as an opportunity to have a test and also an overall
health check
The tower has been up for 5 years (corroded bolt now
seems more likely, even if not the cause), and started life as
a Vodaphone cell site. A few weeks ago, BCL (SkyTV)
dishes were added and she says she noticed the tone one
month ago. One night it wasn't there, the next night it very
obviously was
She's now paying more attention to where the tone is. When
she takes the dog for a walk down to the beach (she's on the
outskirts of Brawns Bay, Alan, at the fringe of suburbia), the
tone disappears when she goes over a ridge (ie out of sight of
the tower) and reappears on the way back home
It does seem to be present all around the house, inside and
out. Volume seems not to change with listening position
I've still to do some work with her, eg testing other towers,
trying to get some sort of recording and so on
If/when we ever find out what it is, y'all be the first to know
2006\09\07@044441
by
Jinx
> Post some photos of her here, all the better for us to examine the
> situation more closely.
<stern voice, disapproving look, wagging finger>
Oh, Marcel, so inapproriate
</>
pssst, I'll do what I can
hey, pssst, you didn't get them from me and you ain't seen me, right ?
2006\09\07@045559
by
Alan B. Pearce
>hey, pssst, you didn't get them from me and you ain't seen me, right ?
Well, we can only not see you if you aren't in the pictures ... ;)))
2006\09\07@050333
by
Alan B. Pearce
>She's now paying more attention to where the tone is. When
>she takes the dog for a walk down to the beach (she's on the
>outskirts of Brawns Bay, Alan, at the fringe of suburbia),
Do you mean Browns Bay, on the North Shore ?
{Quote hidden}>the tone disappears when she goes over a ridge (ie out of sight
>of the tower) and reappears on the way back home
>
>It does seem to be present all around the house, inside and
>out. Volume seems not to change with listening position
>
>I've still to do some work with her, eg testing other towers,
>trying to get some sort of recording and so on
>
>If/when we ever find out what it is, y'all be the first to know
Well, at least she is apparently attempting to be scientifically observant
about the problem. It does sound like some form of interaction between the
recently added microwave dishes and possibly some dental work. Maybe a check
for cavities is in order ;)))))
But it does also suggest something like an experiment one of the TV stations
did here with a mobile cellphone mast.
They had a bunch of people go to a weekend retreat type place, well away
from any cell phone masts, and had a mobile base station come and park
outside. Even with the base station turned off some of them reported
"effects" from it. The base station was turned on and off at random
intervals during the weekend, and an attempt made at correlation of
observations of effects reported by the subjects. At the end of it there was
no correlation.
2006\09\07@050514
by
Jinx
> >hey, pssst, you didn't get them from me and you ain't seen me, right ?
>
> Well, we can only not see you if you aren't in the pictures ... ;)))
Chances are I'll be there.....doing bunny ears behind her
2006\09\07@050857
by
Jinx
> she's on the outskirts of Brawns Bay
Ooopsie, typo, Browns Bay. Brawns Bay would be for All
Blacks and persons of a concrete drive laying persuasion
2006\09\07@063713
by
Dennis Crawley
|
part 1 930 bytes content-type:text/plain; (decoded 7bit)
Jinx <RemoveMEjoecolquittTakeThisOuT
spamclear.net.nz> wrote:
> She's now paying more attention to where the tone is. When
> she takes the dog for a walk down to the beach (she's on the
> outskirts of Brawns Bay, Alan, at the fringe of suburbia), the
> tone disappears when she goes over a ridge (ie out of sight of
> the tower) and reappears on the way back home
You can make an Ultrasound converter. I can't find the diagram. NE602 work
substracting the PLL frequency to the sound frequency. It deliver a sound in
500 to 5000 Hz range. eg setting the PLL in 20KHz you get 20.5 to 25.5KHz in
a range 500Hz to 5KHz.
Perhaps it helps her to triangle the source, and another ultrasounds sources
like gas leaks, water pipes, et cetera. It has a good directivity.
I don't have the complete diagram but I believe you can figured out.
Regards,
Dennis.
ps: You can do the chineese massages, anyway.
part 2 3858 bytes content-type:application/octet-stream; (decode)
part 3 35 bytes content-type:text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
(decoded 7bit)
2006\09\07@080859
by
Gerhard Fiedler
Jinx wrote:
> trying to get some sort of recording and so on
IIRC you are quite experienced with epoxy. Maybe you can make one of these
parabola reflectors for a microphone... Might help locate it, if it is an
external audio source. Don't know how much work that is, though.
Or you could use an audio sine generator and try to get it to create
interference with the sound she hears. That's probably the quickest way to
get an idea of the frequency. This may help knowing what to look for.
Gerhard
2006\09\07@081010
by
Russell McMahon
> She's now paying more attention to where the tone is. When
> she takes the dog for a walk down to the beach (she's on the
> outskirts of Brawns Bay, Alan, at the fringe of suburbia), the
> tone disappears when she goes over a ridge (ie out of sight of
> the tower) and reappears on the way back home
>
> It does seem to be present all around the house, inside and
> out. Volume seems not to change with listening position
Serious suggestion: Try enclosing in a ferrous metal screen with no
large slots or holes. This could be eg a refrigerator (going or not)
BUT she may take exception to that but various "tin" trunks etc may
do. It MUST be iron/steel and not a non ferrous material. The test
need last only seconds to see if it makes a difference.
Russell
2006\09\07@081011
by
Russell McMahon
> The base station was turned on and off at random
> intervals during the weekend, and an attempt made at correlation of
> observations of effects reported by the subjects. At the end of it
> there was
> no correlation.
At lower levels you need to wait about 20 years and then examine their
children :-) :-(.
May not always be quite as silly as it sounds alas.
Russell
2006\09\07@083848
by
Jinx
> Do you mean Browns Bay, on the North Shore ?
I had a friend over tonight who's Nokia field tech, and he
pointed me to this site
http://spectrumonline.med.govt.nz/licence-search.html
Select Auckland for the district and Pine Hill for the transmitter
location to bring up what's on the tower in question. I remember
now that Woosh was the last service added, just before the
trouble started
At the Radio Spectrum Management site, there's this link
http://www.rsm.govt.nz/rfi/index.html
which I'll pass on, and maybe she can get an RSM engineer
to come out and test her home
2006\09\07@085051
by
Jinx
> Serious suggestion: Try enclosing in a ferrous metal screen
> with no large slots or holes. This could be eg a refrigerator
> (going or not) BUT she may take exception to that but various
> "tin" trunks etc may do. It MUST be iron/steel and not a non
> ferrous material. The test need last only seconds to see if it
> makes a difference.
You may have missed my comment last night that I'd discussed
with her borrowing a friend's panel van and foiling the windows
and grounding the whole lot. One problem was connecting foil
to the van body. I too thought of a tin trunk or fridge-like box,
but the van seemed the most available and accessible to her. I'm
going to call her first thing in the morning to tell her about the
RSM site (she's present e-mailless) and will ask if she's come up
with anything Faraday cage-wise
2006\09\07@094004
by
Jinx
> You can make an Ultrasound converter
Funny you mention that Dennis. When I thought the tone
was much higher than perhaps it really is, I picked up a
recent copy of Silicon Chip and described to her an
Ultrasonic Convertor project to shift down the sound of
bats. Similar to yours but uses an MC1496 mixer
2006\09\07@101246
by
Howard Winter
Dennis,
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:36:22 -0300, Dennis Crawley wrote:
> You can make an Ultrasound converter. I can't find the diagram. NE602 work
> substracting the PLL frequency to the sound frequency. It deliver a sound in
> 500 to 5000 Hz range. eg setting the PLL in 20KHz you get 20.5 to 25.5KHz in
> a range 500Hz to 5KHz.
Ah, good thinking: a Bat Detector! I have one that I'm sure would work, if there wasn't a planet between it and the problem area.
Jinx: Do you have a Bat Detector to hand, or someone who could lend you one?
Cheers,
Howard Winter
St.Albans, England
2006\09\07@101934
by
Howard Winter
Jinx,
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:31:46 +1200, Jinx wrote:
{Quote hidden}>
> > Do you mean Browns Bay, on the North Shore ?
>
> I had a friend over tonight who's Nokia field tech, and he
> pointed me to this site
>
> spectrumonline.med.govt.nz/licence-search.html
>
> Select Auckland for the district and Pine Hill for the transmitter
> location to bring up what's on the tower in question. I remember
> now that Woosh was the last service added, just before the
> trouble started
Fascinating facility, the ability to see who's doing what on a tower - it would be useful over here, but I can't see them doing that.
I love CANWEST's address: PRIVATE BAG 92624 Is that what we call a P.O.Box?
Cheers,
Howard Winter
St.Albans, England
2006\09\07@103632
by
Alan B. Pearce
>I love CANWEST's address: PRIVATE BAG 92624 Is that what we call a
P.O.Box?
No, a private bag is the next step up from a Private box.
To get the mail from a private box, you have to go to the PO where the box
is located.
A Private Bag is a mail bag with your PB no. in the mail room, and all your
mail gets put in it, and then that bag is delivered direct to your premises.
It is more like a personal postman when you have large volumes of mail.
2006\09\07@113606
by
Russell McMahon
|
>> Serious suggestion: Try enclosing in a ferrous metal screen
>> It MUST be iron/steel and not a non ferrous material.
> You may have missed my comment last night that I'd discussed
> with her borrowing a friend's panel van and foiling the windows
> and grounding the whole lot.
FOIL will not do, as per my above comment, unless it's steel foil,
which we (usually) have not got.
And, grounding is unlikely to be necessary or useful as long as you
get full ferrous enclosure. Grounding would help electrostatic
coupling, which this probably isn't.
A van etc is not a good choice as you can easily introduce long thin
slits which RF just loves to creep through. There are enough solidly
steel fully enclosed things in the world that seeking one out is
liable to be worthwhile. An old tin trunk, as used of yore for moving
house, would suffice. A cabinet type clothes drier (once common, now
seldom seen) would be ideal. Just watch the door closures, although
these are usually well overlapped.
As a bonus, if the cabinet drier worked, although I doubt that it
would, she could use one as an escape haven or even bed !
The Salvation army have an extremely good Op Shop just down from you
(as I imagine you know)(among the best I've met :-) )(pre-selected
dumpster diving at only slightly higher price) and it's just the sort
of place to have a cabinet drier or a tin trunk.
Worth a try if a solid steel cabinet etc cannot be easily obtained is
'chicken wire' or similar. Fine mesh best. Making a continuous cage
with well scrunched together joins would not be overly hard or
expensive. I may have some I could lend you if you have none.
I suspect that, sadly, none of these solutions are going to work and
that she is more likely to be dealing with a psychosomatic problem.
I'd be pleased if it was not so and that there turns out to be a
bricks ad mortar (or RF and fillings) solution as the alternative can
be most intractable. These can be exceedingly real - but the product
of the wonderful and arcane workings of our brains. Even the sanest of
people can have the strangest problems with selected aspects of their
brain functions. Coming to terms with such things when you are
otherwise 103% normal can be a challenge.
Russell
2006\09\07@164820
by
Richard Prosser
|
An no-one's suggested she sleep in a lead-lined coffin yet?
RP
On 08/09/06, Russell McMahon <EraseMEapptechspam
spamBeGoneparadise.net.nz> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> >> Serious suggestion: Try enclosing in a ferrous metal screen
>
> >> It MUST be iron/steel and not a non ferrous material.
>
> > You may have missed my comment last night that I'd discussed
> > with her borrowing a friend's panel van and foiling the windows
> > and grounding the whole lot.
>
> FOIL will not do, as per my above comment, unless it's steel foil,
> which we (usually) have not got.
>
> And, grounding is unlikely to be necessary or useful as long as you
> get full ferrous enclosure. Grounding would help electrostatic
> coupling, which this probably isn't.
>
> A van etc is not a good choice as you can easily introduce long thin
> slits which RF just loves to creep through. There are enough solidly
> steel fully enclosed things in the world that seeking one out is
> liable to be worthwhile. An old tin trunk, as used of yore for moving
> house, would suffice. A cabinet type clothes drier (once common, now
> seldom seen) would be ideal. Just watch the door closures, although
> these are usually well overlapped.
>
> As a bonus, if the cabinet drier worked, although I doubt that it
> would, she could use one as an escape haven or even bed !
>
> The Salvation army have an extremely good Op Shop just down from you
> (as I imagine you know)(among the best I've met :-) )(pre-selected
> dumpster diving at only slightly higher price) and it's just the sort
> of place to have a cabinet drier or a tin trunk.
>
> Worth a try if a solid steel cabinet etc cannot be easily obtained is
> 'chicken wire' or similar. Fine mesh best. Making a continuous cage
> with well scrunched together joins would not be overly hard or
> expensive. I may have some I could lend you if you have none.
>
> I suspect that, sadly, none of these solutions are going to work and
> that she is more likely to be dealing with a psychosomatic problem.
> I'd be pleased if it was not so and that there turns out to be a
> bricks ad mortar (or RF and fillings) solution as the alternative can
> be most intractable. These can be exceedingly real - but the product
> of the wonderful and arcane workings of our brains. Even the sanest of
> people can have the strangest problems with selected aspects of their
> brain functions. Coming to terms with such things when you are
> otherwise 103% normal can be a challenge.
>
>
>
>
> Russell
>
> -
2006\09\07@180403
by
Jinx
> > spectrumonline.med.govt.nz/licence-search.html
> Fascinating facility, the ability to see who's doing what on
> a tower
My Nokia friend tells me that the results might indicate only the
registered transmissions. There could be unregistered or unlicensed
transmitters on the tower too, or perhaps even reserved spots
with no transmitter yet
And yes, it is a fascinating peek into things that are all around us
2006\09\07@181528
by
David VanHorn
I am very skeptical of RF from such a site causing any sort of observable
biological activity.
Why is it that people at our local TV transmitter (750kW) don't have any
noticable effects? Our local AM broadcaster at 10kW? My HT at 5W with the
antenna inches from my head?
Far FAR more likely that something else entirely is going on.
2006\09\07@192838
by
Dennis Crawley
Howard Winter <RemoveMEHDRWKILLspam
H2Org.demon.co.uk> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> Dennis,
>
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:36:22 -0300, Dennis Crawley wrote:
>
>> You can make an Ultrasound converter. I can't find the diagram.
>> NE602 work substracting the PLL frequency to the sound frequency.
>> It deliver a sound in 500 to 5000 Hz range. eg setting the PLL in
>> 20KHz you get 20.5 to 25.5KHz in a range 500Hz to 5KHz.
>
> Ah, good thinking: a Bat Detector! I have one that I'm sure would
> work, if there wasn't a planet between it and the problem area.
>
> Jinx: Do you have a Bat Detector to hand, or someone who could lend
> you one?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Howard Winter
> St.Albans, England
I've never heard!.
But since you've told us something about it I found this link
http://bertrik.sikken.nl/bat/index.html
and, well, they are talking about almost the same.
I'm very interested in how this thing is going to end. :)
Dennis Crawley
Buenos Aires,
Argentina
2006\09\07@194900
by
Gus S Calabrese
^ I am ( seereously ) suggesting that you shield her from possible
X-men effects ( Magneto ) by wrapping her completely in chains. I
don't think
the chains will be completely effective if she is wearing any clothes.
Please report the results and send photos.
AGSC ^
On 2006-Sep 07, at 16:15hrs PM, David VanHorn wrote:
I am very skeptical of RF from such a site causing any sort of
observable
biological activity.
Why is it that people at our local TV transmitter (750kW) don't have any
noticable effects? Our local AM broadcaster at 10kW? My HT at 5W
with the
antenna inches from my head?
Far FAR more likely that something else entirely is going on.
2006\09\07@214058
by
Jinx
> ^ I am ( seereously ) suggesting that you shield her from
> possible X-men effects ( Magneto ) by wrapping her
> completely in chains. I don't think the chains will be
> completely effective if she is wearing any clothes
And that opinion is based on........ ;-) Hehe, you grub
> Please report the results and send photos.
Now, see, they're gonna cost ya
Apparently she did get some relief and sleep last night by standing
"tin" (ie steel) oven trays around the head end of the bed. She
reports that she could hear the sound above the trays but not nearly
so loud when she put her head down on the pillow. Interesting
When I mentioned that I'd found a CanWest transmitter on the
tower, she added that her TV3 (a CanWest TV station) reception
has deteriorated recently. "Turned to shit" was the phrase used
I've suggested she enquire at RSM and report the signal quality
drop to CanWest. Hopefully between them they can find out if
there's something out of whack on the tower. With all the work
being done on it by other companies, maybe someone's trod on
or knocked something
2006\09\07@222653
by
Russell McMahon
> Apparently she did get some relief and sleep last night by standing
> "tin" (ie steel) oven trays around the head end of the bed. She
> reports that she could hear the sound above the trays but not nearly
> so loud when she put her head down on the pillow. Interesting
Do the chicken wire test quickly before somebody fixes something. IF
this works it's a major indicator of real RF issues - or a well
targeted psychosomatic effect. Either way, if it works it works :-)
Russell
'[OT] 11MW solar tower in Spain'
2007\04\05@182824
by
Alex Harford
thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2007/04/11_mw_solar_tow.html
"The 11 megawatt PS10 solar power plant will generate 24.3 GW/hr per
year of clean energy and comprises 624 movable heliostats (mirrors).
Each of the mirrors has a surface area of 120 square meters (1292
square feet) which concentrates the Sun's rays to the top of a
115-meter (377 foot) high tower where the solar receiver and a steam
turbine are located. The turbine drives a generator, producing
electricity. The two axis heliostats move automatically as a function
of the solar calendar."
I think there is a typo in the above sentence (24.3GW/hr / year should
be 24.3GWh) but nevertheless, it looks very interesting!
More details here: http://www.euro-energy.net/success_stories/52.html
Having spend some time in southern Spain in August, I definitely agree
that solar power is the way to go in that part of the world!
Alex
'[TECH] Leaning ring tower in Taiwan ( concept )'
2011\10\21@142855
by
YES NOPE9
www.gizmag.com/circular-tower-concept-taichung-city/20229/picture/145433
2011\10\22@084435
by
RussellMc
2011\10\22@085404
by
Joe Wronski
On 10/22/2011 8:43 AM, RussellMc wrote:
>> www.gizmag.com/circular-tower-concept-taichung-city/20229/picture/145433/
> A pointless building. Literally ;-).
>
> Looks like fun.
> Spin for gravity, walk om outer :-).
> Ringworld engineers.
> Scrith would be handy.
>
> I've visited Taichung twice. FWIW.
>
>
> Russell
I think it's really a Stargate.
Joe W
2011\10\22@090853
by
Chris McSweeny
'[TECH] Leaning ring tower in Taiwan ( concept )'
2011\11\09@202934
by
Vitaliy
2011\11\09@211825
by
RussellMc
2011\11\10@042444
by
alan.b.pearce
> > >> www.gizmag.com/circular-tower-concept-taichung-city/20229/pi
> > >> cture/145433/
>
> > Could you fly a plane through it?
>
> Could - yes.
> Allowed to - no.
> Somebody would? - if they ever built it, yes.
>
>
>
> Russell
Oh, you mean shades of Fredd Ladd and the Auckland harbour Bridge ...
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/end-of-tolls-on-auckland-harbour-bridge
History of Fredd Ladd here, with picture of his Grumman Widgeon ...
http://www.weloveseaplanes.com/heroes--fred-ladd.html
Part of his defence in the court case was that he had been flying flying boats off that stretch of water for years, and now some clown had built a bridge across his runway ... exactly the sort of humour that matched his other witticisms listed in the second link. Later on he did taxi a seaplane under the bridge before doing the takeoff run.
-- Scanned by iCritical.
2011\11\10@093412
by
Yigit Turgut
Where does the other end open to ? Is the destination programmable or
hardcoded ? If so, does it support ICSP ? (:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Joe Wronski <spamBeGonejwronskiSTOPspam
EraseMEstillwatereng.net> wrote:
> I think it's really a Stargate.
> Joe
2011\11\10@110929
by
Peter Johansson
2011\11\10@125847
by
RussellMc
2011\11\11@040541
by
alan.b.pearce
> Now you've done it.
;)))))
> Interesting takeoff.
> Ilyushin IL76
>
> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?hl=en&tab=wm#all/13327bf8a06333cc
Insists I sign up for Gmail, no thank you.
>
> Very competent (what would I know) 747 crosswind landing
>
> www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=TlVEl89CUAQ
>
One of the first flights I ever did involved a landing just like that, at Wellington Airport (NZ), in a Fokker Friendship. I remember being seated fairly well down the plane, and approaching the runway from the south, looking out the window at the runway getting closer until the last moment when the pilot straightened up just like in that video.
-- Scanned by iCritical.
2011\11\11@122021
by
John Ferrell
2011\11\11@132845
by
RussellMc
> On 11/11/2011 4:05 AM, @spam@alan.b.pearce@spam@
spam_OUTstfc.ac.uk wrote:
>>> Now you've done it.
> When I was a kid there was a story telling radio program called "Can You
> Top This".
> In that spirit, I suggest this story is the winner.
> http://www.b-47.com/stories/lappo/lappo.html
A bit flowery and long winded (and that's Russell saying that :-) )
BUT a good story.
I can't immediately think of one to top that, but ...
__________
- As noted a few posts back, Captain Fred Ladd flew a Grumman Wigeon
(AFAIR) under the Auckland Harbour Bridge and got the usual treatment.
Not as exciting as Lappos' RB-47E underflight but probably more
dangerous (and then not very dangerous).
__________
This minor story is true but nobody would ever confirm it. It has no
'point' per s, but my camera would have liked to be there:
My brother in law used to own a farm which was about 1 square mile
and long and thin. It started on a road ridge, ran down a gentle slope
to a flat plain and then rose to a hill line at the far end. The
farmhouse was on the road ridge with a nice view down the farm. The
RNZAF operates Orion aircraft for maritime patrol and notional
antisubmarine response. Our crews have on occasion won against
international competition in antisubmarine events so they know their
atuff - and anyone with years in an Orion knows where the extremes of
his craft are as well as a cat knows where it's whiskertips and paws
are.
My brother in law's children had a school friend home to stay for the
weekend. Said friends dad was in the RNZAF. He was a navigator. In an
Orion. That weekend dad and friends came visiting. The Orion popped
over the hills at the far end of the farm, dropped to about fence
level and proceeded towards the farmhouse. Maybe he overflew first to
get their attention. Some time ago so memory dims, but i recall that
they saw him coming. Up the farm up the farm up the farm - wheeee....
.. Not quite wheel marks on the roof but that was because the wheels
were up. Bye dad ... .
_____________
This is also true:
Our capital city of wellington is known for its wind and its steep
hills and its not so nice to approach airport which at one stage got
nasty ratings from international pilots due as much to poor support
services as the actual airport, Sensible behaviour and good navigation
and all is well. Even at night in fog. As long as the navigation
beacons behave. Story had it that there was a complex echo situation
and that in some conditions the beacon system would misreport an
aircraft's position. Pilot's complained. Investigations happened
without finding any problems. Nothing changed. Back then a DC8 was a
respectable aircraft and Air NZ had a modest fleet of them.
In Newmarket in Auckland there was a PCB shop named Circuit Graphics.
Good prices, good services, good response time. Hobbyist friendly.
Probably not the most leading edge facilities From memory, back then
they did not do PTH, but, back then many people didn't. Proprietor Don
was friendly, helpful, cheerful. Nice guy.
1975. Standard dark and stormy night as I recall. DC8 inbound from
Fiji on final over hilly hillside suburb of Newlands. Nearby the
Newlands beacon decided this was the night for a spurious echo. Yee
ha. Residents reported a DC8 appearing out of the clouds and flying
down the valley below rooftop level in some cases. Probably made
buzzing a farm feel tame. Go around power please. Pilot managed to
respond fast enough and well enough to save the day. Only only only
just from various accounts. Usual inquiry. Pilot suspended. Vilified.
Found responsible and cashiered. Loud yelling by all and yon.
Investigation. Beacon problems identified and remedied. Pilot
exonerated. By then he'd moved on. Never came back to the company.
Compensation payout etc. National hero of sorts. He bought a small
PCB company in Newmarket. Nice guy. I never knew that he was the man
concerned till years after he'd sold the business and moved on to
other things. Last I knew he was running a graphic arts business in
Helensville.
Russel
2011\11\11@142834
by
John Ferrell
|
On 11/11/2011 1:28 PM, RussellMc wrote:
>> On 11/11/2011 4:05 AM, spamBeGonealan.b.pearce
KILLspamstfc.ac.uk wrote:
>>>> Now you've done it.
>> When I was a kid there was a story telling radio program called "Can You
>> Top This".
>> In that spirit, I suggest this story is the winner.
>> http://www.b-47.com/stories/lappo/lappo.html
> A bit flowery and long winded (and that's Russell saying that :-) )
> BUT a good story.
>
> I can't immediately think of one to top that, but ...
>
>
> Not as exciting as Lappos' RB-47E underflight but probably more
> dangerous (and then not very dangerous).
>
>
Men of the Colonel's nature rarely take chances. He would not have tried it if he had not known it to be well within the performance envelope of his resources. I understand both sides of the resulting reactions, but the Colonel had a few moments for his decision, and the detractor's had all the time in the world. The penalty was, IMHO, excessive.
-- John Ferrell W8CCW
"The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely to be the one who dropped it."
2011\11\12@013323
by
Richard Prosser
|
On 12 November 2011 07:28, RussellMc <.....apptechnzspam_OUT
gmail.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}>> On 11/11/2011 4:05 AM,
TakeThisOuTalan.b.pearce.....
TakeThisOuTstfc.ac.uk wrote:
>>>> Now you've done it.
>> When I was a kid there was a story telling radio program called "Can You
>> Top This".
>> In that spirit, I suggest this story is the winner.
>>
http://www.b-47.com/stories/lappo/lappo.html
>
> A bit flowery and long winded (and that's Russell saying that :-) )
> BUT a good story.
>
> I can't immediately think of one to top that, but ...
>
> __________
>
> - As noted a few posts back, Captain Fred Ladd flew a Grumman Wigeon
> (AFAIR) under the Auckland Harbour Bridge and got the usual treatment.
> Not as exciting as Lappos' RB-47E underflight but probably more
> dangerous (and then not very dangerous).
>
> __________
>
> This minor story is true but nobody would ever confirm it. It has no
> 'point' per s, but my camera would have liked to be there:
>
> My brother in law used to own a farm which was about 1 square mile
> and long and thin. It started on a road ridge, ran down a gentle slope
> to a flat plain and then rose to a hill line at the far end. The
> farmhouse was on the road ridge with a nice view down the farm. The
> RNZAF operates Orion aircraft for maritime patrol and notional
> antisubmarine response. Our crews have on occasion won against
> international competition in antisubmarine events so they know their
> atuff - and anyone with years in an Orion knows where the extremes of
> his craft are as well as a cat knows where it's whiskertips and paws
> are.
>
> My brother in law's children had a school friend home to stay for the
> weekend. Said friends dad was in the RNZAF. He was a navigator. In an
> Orion. That weekend dad and friends came visiting. The Orion popped
> over the hills at the far end of the farm, dropped to about fence
> level and proceeded towards the farmhouse. Maybe he overflew first to
> get their attention. Some time ago so memory dims, but i recall that
> they saw him coming. Up the farm up the farm up the farm - wheeee....
> . Not quite wheel marks on the roof but that was because the wheels
> were up. Bye dad ... .
>
> _____________
>
> This is also true:
>
> Our capital city of wellington is known for its wind and its steep
> hills and its not so nice to approach airport which at one stage got
> nasty ratings from international pilots due as much to poor support
> services as the actual airport, Sensible behaviour and good navigation
> and all is well. Even at night in fog. As long as the navigation
> beacons behave. Story had it that there was a complex echo situation
> and that in some conditions the beacon system would misreport an
> aircraft's position. Pilot's complained. Investigations happened
> without finding any problems. Nothing changed. Back then a DC8 was a
> respectable aircraft and Air NZ had a modest fleet of them.
>
> In Newmarket in Auckland there was a PCB shop named Circuit Graphics.
> Good prices, good services, good response time. Hobbyist friendly.
> Probably not the most leading edge facilities From memory, back then
> they did not do PTH, but, back then many people didn't. Proprietor Don
> was friendly, helpful, cheerful. Nice guy.
>
> 1975. Standard dark and stormy night as I recall. DC8 inbound from
> Fiji on final over hilly hillside suburb of Newlands. Nearby the
> Newlands beacon decided this was the night for a spurious echo. Yee
> ha. Residents reported a DC8 appearing out of the clouds and flying
> down the valley below rooftop level in some cases. Probably made
> buzzing a farm feel tame. Go around power please. Pilot managed to
> respond fast enough and well enough to save the day. Only only only
> just from various accounts. Usual inquiry. Pilot suspended. Vilified.
> Found responsible and cashiered. Loud yelling by all and yon.
> Investigation. Beacon problems identified and remedied. Pilot
> exonerated. By then he'd moved on. Never came back to the company.
> Compensation payout etc. National hero of sorts. He bought a small
> PCB company in Newmarket. Nice guy. I never knew that he was the man
> concerned till years after he'd sold the business and moved on to
> other things. Last I knew he was running a graphic arts business in
> Helensville.
>
>
> Russell
> --
I believe Wellington is one of the safest airports around - because
you can guarantee that both pilot and copilot are fully awake and
paying attention to what's going on!
RP
2011\11\12@015255
by
RussellMc
As a child I (arguably perversely) look at pictures oh the then Hong
Kong "Kai Tak" airport and hoped that one day I'd get to fly into it
as a passenger. The incredible "strip at the bottom of a basin
feeling " looked attractive.
I'm now pleased to say that long before I ever got to HK they had
retired their inner city marvel / abomination and opened their new
vast and only slightly distant replacement (25 minutes by
faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaast train,)
You can still see the old one on eg Google maps and marvel at their
sheer chutzpah at pretending you could really use it for international
flights.
Kai Tak - close to town - very.
http://wikimapia.org/#lat=22.3164928&lon=114.2047691&z=15&l=0&m=b&search=hong%20kong
Boring new CLK airport. Very nice.
http://wikimapia.org/#lat=22.3054555&lon=113.917923&z=15&l=0&m=b&search=hong%20kong
R
On 12 November 2011 19:33, Richard Prosser <TakeThisOuTrhprosserKILLspam
spamgmail.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> On 12 November 2011 07:28, RussellMc <
.....apptechnz
RemoveMEgmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2011 4:05 AM,
RemoveMEalan.b.pearce
spamBeGonestfc.ac.uk wrote:
>>>>> Now you've done it.
>>> When I was a kid there was a story telling radio program called "Can You
>>> Top This".
>>> In that spirit, I suggest this story is the winner.
>>>
http://www.b-47.com/stories/lappo/lappo.html
>>
>> A bit flowery and long winded (and that's Russell saying that :-) )
>> BUT a good story.
>>
>> I can't immediately think of one to top that, but ...
>>
>> __________
>>
>> - As noted a few posts back, Captain Fred Ladd flew a Grumman Wigeon
>> (AFAIR) under the Auckland Harbour Bridge and got the usual treatment.
>> Not as exciting as Lappos' RB-47E underflight but probably more
>> dangerous (and then not very dangerous).
>>
>> __________
>>
>> This minor story is true but nobody would ever confirm it. It has no
>> 'point' per s, but my camera would have liked to be there:
>>
>> My brother in law used to own a farm which was about 1 square mile
>> and long and thin. It started on a road ridge, ran down a gentle slope
>> to a flat plain and then rose to a hill line at the far end. The
>> farmhouse was on the road ridge with a nice view down the farm. The
>> RNZAF operates Orion aircraft for maritime patrol and notional
>> antisubmarine response. Our crews have on occasion won against
>> international competition in antisubmarine events so they know their
>> atuff - and anyone with years in an Orion knows where the extremes of
>> his craft are as well as a cat knows where it's whiskertips and paws
>> are.
>>
>> My brother in law's children had a school friend home to stay for the
>> weekend. Said friends dad was in the RNZAF. He was a navigator. In an
>> Orion. That weekend dad and friends came visiting. The Orion popped
>> over the hills at the far end of the farm, dropped to about fence
>> level and proceeded towards the farmhouse. Maybe he overflew first to
>> get their attention. Some time ago so memory dims, but i recall that
>> they saw him coming. Up the farm up the farm up the farm - wheeee....
>> . Not quite wheel marks on the roof but that was because the wheels
>> were up. Bye dad ... .
>>
>> _____________
>>
>> This is also true:
>>
>> Our capital city of wellington is known for its wind and its steep
>> hills and its not so nice to approach airport which at one stage got
>> nasty ratings from international pilots due as much to poor support
>> services as the actual airport, Sensible behaviour and good navigation
>> and all is well. Even at night in fog. As long as the navigation
>> beacons behave. Story had it that there was a complex echo situation
>> and that in some conditions the beacon system would misreport an
>> aircraft's position. Pilot's complained. Investigations happened
>> without finding any problems. Nothing changed. Back then a DC8 was a
>> respectable aircraft and Air NZ had a modest fleet of them.
>>
>> In Newmarket in Auckland there was a PCB shop named Circuit Graphics.
>> Good prices, good services, good response time. Hobbyist friendly.
>> Probably not the most leading edge facilities From memory, back then
>> they did not do PTH, but, back then many people didn't. Proprietor Don
>> was friendly, helpful, cheerful. Nice guy.
>>
>> 1975. Standard dark and stormy night as I recall. DC8 inbound from
>> Fiji on final over hilly hillside suburb of Newlands. Nearby the
>> Newlands beacon decided this was the night for a spurious echo. Yee
>> ha. Residents reported a DC8 appearing out of the clouds and flying
>> down the valley below rooftop level in some cases. Probably made
>> buzzing a farm feel tame. Go around power please. Pilot managed to
>> respond fast enough and well enough to save the day. Only only only
>> just from various accounts. Usual inquiry. Pilot suspended. Vilified.
>> Found responsible and cashiered. Loud yelling by all and yon.
>> Investigation. Beacon problems identified and remedied. Pilot
>> exonerated. By then he'd moved on. Never came back to the company.
>> Compensation payout etc. National hero of sorts. He bought a small
>> PCB company in Newmarket. Nice guy. I never knew that he was the man
>> concerned till years after he'd sold the business and moved on to
>> other things. Last I knew he was running a graphic arts business in
>> Helensville.
>>
>>
>> Russell
>> --
>
> I believe Wellington is one of the safest airports around - because
> you can guarantee that both pilot and copilot are fully awake and
> paying attention to what's going on!
>
> RP
>
>
2011\11\14@004826
by
Vitaliy
John Ferrell wrote:
> Men of the Colonel's nature rarely take chances. He would not have tried
> it if he had not known it to be well within the performance envelope of
> his resources.
You don't know that.
> I understand both sides of the resulting reactions, but
> the Colonel had a few moments for his decision, and the detractor's had
> all the time in the world. The penalty was, IMHO, excessive.
I kept thinking about the B-52 "Bud" Holland, whose foolish bravado killed his comrades and cost him his life:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Fairchild_Air_Force_Base_B-52_crash
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUEhNKBi4DY
The truly brave man in this story is "Mark McGeehan, the USAF squadron commander who refused to allow any of his squadron members to fly with Holland unless he (McGeehan) was also on the aircraft." He paid the ultimate price.
Vitaliy
2011\11\14@013035
by
RussellMc
> > Men of the Colonel's nature rarely take chances. He would not have tried
> > it if he had not known it to be well within the performance envelope of
> > his resources.
> You don't know that.
None of us know anything, as it were.
[What the performance envelope of his resources were and what was
required for that "stunt" would have been well known to all at the
time of the court martial, but I do not have any idea personally.]
BUT as soon as I read the above story I thought (of course) about Bud Holland.
I haven't clicked on the link and I did not remember the name BUT I
have no absolutely no doubt [tm] that he is the idiot I have in mind.
Holland was essentially insane - and all who knew him well knew this.
The Colonel was made of different stuff, and everyone also knew that.
There is a certain commonality required to be a B52 pilot.
Beyond that there was a very substantial degree of difference.
20/20 hindsite is a marvellous improver of perspective, but I suspect
I'd have gladly flown with the Colonel on his under-bridge flight and
have fled from Holland as much as possible. But, then, I'm the one guy
in 10,000+ who stands at the end of the airbridge prior to boarding an
airliner in winter conditions and looks for signs of bad deicing
procedures. [I don't know what I'll really do if I find such]. But
also happily [tm] climbs over safety fences where people have died
*IF* I judge it is reasonable to do so (never without both fear and
great care)(but usually, only if in addition (and not instead) my
camera says I should :-)..
Russel
2011\11\14@013600
by
RussellMc
Now I've seen the video.
My recollection is that he was attempting a barrel roll - which he
always claimed he could achieve. I don't know why he failed - it seems
like it should be eminently achievable. No doubt the why is all well
documented. ALL large modern aircraft are inherently yaw unstable and
have yaw dampers / correctors (mechanical in ye olde craft and who
knows what in latest to compensate). Mayhaps the yaw correction
mechanism was not told about the forces it would experience in a
barrel roll. Not trying this first at say 10,000 feet seems unwise.
Still.
Russel
2011\11\14@153005
by
John Ferrell
|
On 11/14/2011 1:29 AM, RussellMc wrote:
>>> Men of the Colonel's nature rarely take chances. He would not have tried
>>> it if he had not known it to be well within the performance envelope of
>>> his resources.
>> You don't know that.
> None of us know anything, as it were.
>
> [What the performance envelope of his resources were and what was
> required for that "stunt" would have been well known to all at the
> time of the court martial, but I do not have any idea personally.]
>
> BUT as soon as I read the above story I thought (of course) about Bud Holland.
> I haven't clicked on the link and I did not remember the name BUT I
> have no absolutely no doubt [tm] that he is the idiot I have in mind.
Lakko never operated his craft outside of the published and tested limits.
He was successful.
Holland took his craft and crew into an area of operation that was not tested and may have have been defined as outside the operating envelope of the craft.
Unlike bridges, there are no safety factors in airplane specs. The Red lines are marked where structural failure is expected.
Given an opportunity think about it, I would pass on both opportunities to ride along.
OTH, in the mid 1980's I was invited to ride a test flight in a Hiller Helicopter (may be from the 1950's) that had wooden rotor blades. I did it, and given similar circumstances, I would do it again!
The pilot seemed to take forever on the ground spinning the blades under power to distribute the moisture content evenly to minimize vibration. At least that is what he said. It seemed a lot like a PanAm Heli Shuttle from Newark to LaGuardia I once had. A big, bumpy, noisy flight with a landing so gentle and precise it reminded me of Ballet.
Back to the real world...
I have bored the list enough for one day.
-- John Ferrell W8CCW
"The man who complains about the way the
ball bounces is likely to be the one who dropped it."
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2011
, 2012 only
- Today
- New search...