Actually, a local printing company once gave me a "formula" from one of their printer manuals ... the printer described how to get "black" and "rich black". (I was looking into this for PCB layouts on transparencies).
Black was pretty much just black, but rich-black was a certain ratio of C, M and Y to create a black color that was darker, and therefore less transparent. Don't have the formula here, and it the ratios may be tweaked for that printer, but the same concept should apply here.
Cheers,
-Neil.
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 04:50, Mike Harrison scribbled:
{Quote hidden}> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 16:27:13 PDT, you wrote:
> >Just out of curiosity, has anyone tried any of the color laser printers
> >(NOT inkjets!) in toner-transfer setups to see if the colored toners have
> >any unexpected advantages over the normal black? (for instance, I'd
> > expect them to have a bit less pigment than black, since they don't need
> > to be opaque, but I don't know whether that would result in noticable
> > differences in other behavior..._
> >
> >BillW
>
> What might be an advantage is if you could trick the printer into putting
> down 3 colours, so the toner ends up thicker - e.g. a very dark tint
> instead of black.
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv
KILLspammitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body