Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'basic stamp infrared'
1995\07\03@004620
by
Mike Brothers
|
Dear All,
I am working on a Basic Stamp project that detects IR from a
standard tv remote control. I tried to use a standard IR
phototransistor but found that I had to place the remote control
within 1/4" for it to work. I then tried using a transistor to amplify
the circuit. I coupled the collectors of the phototransistor and
transistor, and connected the emitter of the phototransistor to the
base of the transistor. In a darkened room, the circuit worked great.
But in normal room light, the circuit acted as if it was continuously
detecting IR. I tried using an IR filter lens from a remote control
to shield the phototransistor, but it did not seem to help.
Question: How do I reduce the sensitivity of the IR phototransistor
to normal light? Should I scrap this idea, and use the GP1U52X IR
receiver module mentioned in Basic Stamp application note #11?
Any help you can give me would be greatly appreciated!
Mike Brothers
spam_OUTelectronTakeThisOuT
wln.com
1995\07\03@022940
by
Andrew Warren
Mike Brothers <.....electronKILLspam
@spam@WLN.COM> wrote:
>I am working on a Basic Stamp project that detects IR from a
>standard tv remote control. I tried to use a standard IR
>phototransistor but found that I had to place the remote control
>within 1/4" for it to work.
> ....
>Question: How do I reduce the sensitivity of the IR phototransistor
>to normal light? Should I scrap this idea, and use the GP1U52X IR
>receiver module[?]
Mike:
IR remote controls modulate their signal on a 40 KHz (or so) carrier.
Your receiver must include a highpass filter to block frequencies below
this. The receiver modules are probably your best bet; they include
the filter, amplifiers, etc.
-Andy
--
Andrew Warren - fastfwd
KILLspamix.netcom.com
Fast Forward Engineering, Vista, California
1995\07\03@035912
by
Lotty
Mike wrote:
>> I am working on a Basic Stamp project that detects IR from a
>> standard tv remote control. I tried to use a standard IR
>> phototransistor but found that I had to place the remote control
>> within 1/4" for it to work. ....
Why not using a special IR-receiver device like SH205(?)?
Thease things work quite good (very sensitive) and aren't expensive.
Inside there is an optical IR-filter, a 44kHz filter, impulseformer
etc. They are supplied over a 100 Ohm resistor and need an electrolytic
cap. At the out-pin delivers a recangular signal like that:
IR _____|_|_|_|_______
_____
OUT ____| |_______
_____
| _ |
100R | |_| |
|_____|
+5V __/\/\___| | |____ out
| |
-||-
+ 10u
There are some devices on the market, from different companies, sometimes
optimized for different IR burst frequencies.
Really great stuff!
Lothar
1995\07\03@113250
by
Benjamin Britt
>
> I am working on a Basic Stamp project that detects IR from a
> standard tv remote control. .....Should I scrap this idea, and use
> the GP1U52X IR receiver?
> Mike Brothers
> .....electronKILLspam
.....wln.com
Hi Mike,
I did this for an IBM PC on a parallel port. It was a NE555
-based transmitter and a GP1U52X receiver. The receiver was
trivial using the module. The bitstream from TV/VCR remotes
comes in at a very low rate but getting enough resolution from
the PC clock is a challenge.
I'd go for the GP1U52X approach. It's easy to use, widely
available, and inexpensive.
Ben
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1995
, 1996 only
- Today
- New search...