Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'SPAM: [PIC] Proportional (of PID) vs. hardware fi'
2005\05\12@134207
by
PicDude
Yep. I actually meant that I implemented the proportional part of the full
PID.
Not sure what you exactly mean by "what method". I'm banging bits in
assembly.
Cheers,
-Neil.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 12:11 pm, Jan-Erik Soderholm scribbled:
> PID != "Proportional control".
>
> PID = "Proportional, Integrating and Derivating control"
>
> What method are you using ?
>
> Jan-Erik.
2005\05\12@143115
by
Jan-Erik Soderholm
(Where did the SPAM: part in the subject come from ???)
PicDude wrote :
> Yep. I actually meant that I implemented the proportional
> part of the full PID.
OK. Fine.
I was misslead by the "PID" in the subject.
As I understand now, your post has nothing at all to do
with PID. Sorry...
>
> Not sure what you exactly mean by "what method".
I ment if you are running a "P" regulator or a "PID" regulator.
But that's clear now... :-)
Jan-Erik.
2005\05\12@144312
by
PicDude
On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:31 pm, Jan-Erik Soderholm scribbled:
> (Where did the SPAM: part in the subject come from ???)
Think that came from my ISP, who prefixes that on any email that may
potentially be spam. It's usually wrong, and they know that, so it doesn't
actually delete any emails.
Cheers,
-Neil.
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2005
, 2006 only
- Today
- New search...
