>
> Its been a bad few days for the piclist.com address. There is apparently a
> continuing DNS problem. I first noticed it yesterday (DNS problems don't
> always show up the same way to everyone, it can be fine in one area for a
> quite a while after the problem actually occurs) and notified the DNS
> provider, domain name owner (Jory) and the other admins (Mark). The DNS
> provider restarted a server (which solved the problem at least for me and at
> least until yesterday evening) and suggested some changes.
>
> Today, the address is again not resolving to an IP address. The site itself
> is not busy or overloaded. The DNS server is apparently what is giving you
> the "too many people" message.
>
> The DNS provider is very helpful and I'm sure that he and Jory will be able
> to get it solved. I'll do anything I can as well.
>
> In the mean time, you can access the server directly and the piclist.com
> site via the techref at:
>
http://204.210.50.240/techref/default.asp?url=piclist
>
> Also, the search engine for the PICList is not at the piclist.com site.
> There is a link from piclist.com but the site is
>
http://www.iversoft.com/piclist/
>
> And on top of that... The site server had a bad night last night from about
> 2200 to 0630 but was up yesterday and is up today. The damn thing screwed
> itself good.... Second time since we started. No idea why. Had a VDX page
> fault message this time. Nothing in the M$ knowledge base. Blue screen by
> this morning and a lot of people said they couldn't get in. Sorry about the
> hassle. Its up again now.
>
> The good news is PacBell finally got our 384kbps DSL connection up at a
> location where the server can be monitored 24/7. The current server only has
> human companionship <GRIN> 06:30 to 15:30 daily. We are testing the
> connection for reliability and setting up a new server machine. Then we will
> register a nicer domain name for the techref and move the techref and
> PICList sites. The old server will continue for other things and refer
> techref and PICList people to the new address.
>
> I'm also experimenting with Linux (Red Hat 6.1) as a router and backup web
> server. I've seen some interesting things done where an NT box and a Linux
> box ping each other (actually they hit each others web pages) and if one
> dies, the other takes over. The idea is that even if something external
> (hacker, virus, anything that triggers an OS flaw, etc...) kills one, its
> very unlikely to kill the other. Since I use a lot of ASP and 32-bit machine
> language MASM code, in my case the Linux box will only have a "We are
> experiencing technical difficulties" web page and it will spend its time
> screaming (pager, audio alarm, phone calls, etc...) for help and maybe
> rebooting the NT server. So far the Red Hat installer has some kind of
> security problem with the partition table, but I've not had time to really
> trouble shoot it. Any Linux guru's in the San Diego north county area?
>
> ---
> James Newton
.....jamesnewtonKILLspam
@spam@geocities.com 1-619-652-0593
>
http://techref.homepage.com The Technical Details Site.
> Members can add private/public comments/pages ($0 TANSTAAFL web hosting)
>