Post by thread:POST REJECTION

ADD A COUPLE OF LINES AT THE BEGINING OF THE RECEIVED PAGE (LIKE I HAVE DONE ) AND YOU WILL NOT HAVE THE PROBLEM REPEATING. I FOUND OUT ABOUT IT THE HARD WAY. I THINK THE MAILER SCANS THE SUBJECT AND A COUPLE OF LINES TO ACCEPT OR REJECT. PAILOOR Scott Shidel... wrote: {Quote hidden}> Can someone reply to this message if you see it? > Did my post about DACs go through? I keep getting this "post has been > > rejected" message, and I dont know why! > > --------------------------------------- > ------------------------------- > The Pinto Page: http://www.eng.usf.edu/~shidel > Join the Ford Turbo Mailing List! > http://www.FindMail.com/list/turbo/ > Scott > -71 Pinto, stock 2.3 turbo, 13.67@98, radials > 8.1@85 1/8th mile on slicks > -85 Merkur 13.764@98 on radials&3300lbs! Under $300 in mods! > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ----------- -- Chip Technologies Microchip Design Consultant No. 70, 9th Main Road, Mathikere, Bangalore - 560 054. INDIA Tel : +91-80-3362807 Fax : +91-80-3369451 Email : spam_OUTchiptechTakeThisOuTvsnl.com Webpage : http://business.vsnl.com/chiptech

So apparently it's looking for replies on the TOP of the message??? What refugee from Redmond would set it up that way!?!? (This is a test message) At 08:26 AM 2/3/99 +0530, Ravi Pailoor wrote: >ADD A COUPLE OF LINES AT THE BEGINING OF THE RECEIVED PAGE (LIKE I HAVE >DONE ) AND YOU WILL NOT HAVE THE PROBLEM REPEATING. > >I FOUND OUT ABOUT IT THE HARD WAY. I THINK THE MAILER SCANS THE SUBJECT >AND A COUPLE OF LINES TO ACCEPT OR REJECT.

Yep, another M$ bug! (testing also.) Received: from mahtab.neda.net.ir [194.165.21.2] by mail.neda.net.ir [194.165.21 .3] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP4.R) for <.....OURMAZDIKILLspam@spam@IOMCO.COM>; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 0 6:00:50 +0330 Received: from lime.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.1.41]) by mahtab.neda.net.ir with S MTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) id D9FL3KNL; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 06:00:33 +0330 dave vanhorn wrote: > > So apparently it's looking for replies on the TOP of the message??? > What refugee from Redmond would set it up that way!?!? > (This is a test message)

This line required to fool stupid software. At 01:26 PM 2/3/99 +0800, Regulus Berdin wrote: >Yep, another M$ bug! (testing also.) >> So apparently it's looking for replies on the TOP of the message??? >> What refugee from Redmond would set it up that way!?!? >> (This is a test message) Looks like, I never got a bounce from my previous message. I smell recently installed/downgraded bugware at work.

I don't think that it is quite that simple. If you take a look at my recent message about a project distribution site, you'll see that (a) I changed the subject line, (b) I included several paragraphs of new text *above* an excerpt of Jan's previous message, which was properly offset with ">" characters and (c) there was new text below that (my .sig lines). I got post rejection messages (two of them) for that post. --Bob On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 10:32:59PM -0500, dave vanhorn wrote: {Quote hidden}> So apparently it's looking for replies on the TOP of the message??? > What refugee from Redmond would set it up that way!?!? > (This is a test message) > > At 08:26 AM 2/3/99 +0530, Ravi Pailoor wrote: > >ADD A COUPLE OF LINES AT THE BEGINING OF THE RECEIVED PAGE (LIKE I HAVE > >DONE ) AND YOU WILL NOT HAVE THE PROBLEM REPEATING. > > > >I FOUND OUT ABOUT IT THE HARD WAY. I THINK THE MAILER SCANS THE SUBJECT > >AND A COUPLE OF LINES TO ACCEPT OR REJECT. -- ============================================================ Bob Drzyzgula It's not a problem bobKILLspamdrzyzgula.org until something bad happens ============================================================

My vote's a loop on the incoming mail files side of the listserve box. <G> Something like: I send a message; Somehow it is submitted to the list server but the copy isn't deleted; It then gets submitted again; And possibly again, finally getting deleted. (Does seem like I'm seeing 2 copies of at least SOME posts; I file 'em in a folder, I haven't gone looking yet - I will if it'll help Jory.) Mark Bob Drzyzgula wrote: {Quote hidden}> > I don't think that it is quite that simple. If you take > a look at my recent message about a project distribution > site, you'll see that (a) I changed the subject line, (b) I > included several paragraphs of new text *above* an excerpt > of Jan's previous message, which was properly offset with > ">" characters and (c) there was new text below that (my > .sig lines). I got post rejection messages (two of them) > for that post. > > --Bob > > On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 10:32:59PM -0500, dave vanhorn wrote: > > So apparently it's looking for replies on the TOP of the message??? > > What refugee from Redmond would set it up that way!?!? > > (This is a test message) > > > > At 08:26 AM 2/3/99 +0530, Ravi Pailoor wrote: > > >ADD A COUPLE OF LINES AT THE BEGINING OF THE RECEIVED PAGE (LIKE I HAVE > > >DONE ) AND YOU WILL NOT HAVE THE PROBLEM REPEATING. > > > > > >I FOUND OUT ABOUT IT THE HARD WAY. I THINK THE MAILER SCANS THE SUBJECT > > >AND A COUPLE OF LINES TO ACCEPT OR REJECT. > > -- > ============================================================ > Bob Drzyzgula It's not a problem > .....bobKILLspam.....drzyzgula.org until something bad happens > ============================================================

At 04:01 AM 2/3/99 -0500, Bob Drzyzgula wrote: >I don't think that it is quite that simple. If you take >a look at my recent message about a project distribution >site, you'll see that (a) I changed the subject line, (b) I >included several paragraphs of new text *above* an excerpt >of Jan's previous message, which was properly offset with >">" characters and (c) there was new text below that (my >.sig lines). I got post rejection messages (two of them) >for that post. I got bounces for my test messages too, it just took longer. Something's VERY confused.

dave vanhorn wrote: > > At 04:01 AM 2/3/99 -0500, Bob Drzyzgula wrote: > >I don't think that it is quite that simple. If you take > >a look at my recent message about a project distribution > >site, you'll see that (a) I changed the subject line, (b) I > >included several paragraphs of new text *above* an excerpt > >of Jan's previous message, which was properly offset with > >">" characters and (c) there was new text below that (my > >.sig lines). I got post rejection messages (two of them) > >for that post. > > I got bounces for my test messages too, it just took longer. > Something's VERY confused. Computers: The fastest morons in the universe <G> Jory'll get 'er fixed, we'll survive until then. Mark