Brian Boles (spam_OUTbbolesTakeThisOuT
microchip.com) wrote:
> However, we are still a relatively small company and out of the
> 1,000,000 things we have to do, program memory EEPROM PIC's are about
> number 736,492.
I found an interesting article by Gote Fagerfjall in the scandinavian
electronics magazine "Elektronik i Norden," no 18 1995, p 33. The
article is an interview with Scott Lewis, who is responsible for CPLD
marketing at Xilinx.
A section of the article goes as follows (apologies for imperfect
translation - the original is in Swedish):
{Quote hidden}> "What at first sight distinguishes the new [Xilinx] circuits from other
> programmable logic circuits is probably the flash technology. Xilinx
> has chosen to use the somewhat more complex, but more compact flash
> technology instead of EEPROM or RAM technology.
>
> Since we wanted to program and erase in circuit, EPROM cells was not
> an alternative, says Scott Lewis. In the choice between flash cells and
> EEPROM cells, there was no question it must be flash cells. One
> important reason is that all semiconductor fabs are going for flash
> processes, and this will press down the price in the long run. Another
> reason is that flash cells are easy to scale down when changing to
> more modern technology.
>
> Xilinx and Seiko-Epson have together developed the new flash process
> that is used in the new circuits. In the first stage, it is a 0.6 um
> CMOS process with two metal layers and two polysilicon layers.
>
> Flash cells are always much smaller than EEPROM cells. Instead of four
> transistors, one is enough. Xilinx has chosen to sacrifice some area
> in order to improve reliability. They use two transistors per cell,
> but are still able to reduce the size to about a third of an EEPROM
> cell.
>
> Another advantage with flash cells is that they can be reprogrammed
> more times than EEPROM cells. The fast flash cells can be reprogrammed
> 10,000 times, and the reprogramming cycle is also short, only 10-100
> us."
I find this article very interesting. Perhaps it could be an idea to slightly
improve the 736,492 priority rating of Microchip's memory policy? ;-)
Cheers,
Martin Nilsson
Swedish Institute of Computer Science E-mail: .....mnKILLspam
@spam@sics.se
Box 1263, S-164 28 Kista Fax: +46-8-751-7230
Sweden Tel: +46-8-752-1574