Searching \ for 'Long UV exposure' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page:
Search entire site for: 'Long UV exposure'.

Truncated match.
PICList Thread
'Long UV exposure'
1997\06\25@095640 by ndod

picon face
From the MicroChip Classes they said that some chips have a physical metal
shield that protects some part of the eprom space, so that the rest of the
chip is erased, the rest are not. I belive it was the CP bit. Anyway, their
answer was to turn off the compare.

Kevin E. Dodd
Embedded Systems Consulting
2601 NE Jack London #49
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330

On Wednesday, June 18, 1997 1:02 AM, Mark Street
[SMTP:.....streetmKILLspamspam@spam@CVHP117.GPT.CO.UK] wrote:
> Actually this is an interesting topic for me because I used to be able to
> a 16C74 in around 15 minutes from new (no Code Protect bit set) now it
takes me
>  at least
> 25 minutes.  Why?  Is it the PIC degrading or the UV tube?
> If I accidentally set the CP bit, it takes days to erase!
> Mark Street.
> > I have something to ask (pls forgive me if it's been asked before)
> >
> > I noticed that the newer pics i.e. 16c73's and 16c64's took longer to
{Quote hidden}

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1997 , 1998 only
- Today
- New search...