Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'Informal poll: was [OT] Your PC Time & Date'
1999\02\12@151225
by
Matt Bonner
Caisson wrote:
> That's nothing ! I received mail's from 2098 (Alan Nickerson), 2036 (Uwe
> Holz), 2004 ( Matt Bonner) and several from the year 2000. But better yet
> where those from 1904 (marcel), 1978 (Stephen Collister), 1988 (Ansel
> Sermersheim) and 1995 (M Walter).
>
My old Win95 machine used to like resetting the year to 2004 every time
it crashed (I made extensive use of "AboutTime"). I guess that one got
by me. Luckily my new Win98 machine reloads the proper time whenever it
crashes. This time problem would never be a problem if we had machines
that didn't crash.
Which brings me to the poll.
Crashes per work week:
Win98 PC:
Win95 PC:
DOS PC:
Unix:
Linux box:
Mac:
Amiga:
?:
I'll tally the totals after next Monday's (Feb 22) morning email deluge.
--Matt
1999\02\12@152407
by
dave vanhorn
>I'll tally the totals after next Monday's (Feb 22) morning email deluge.
>
>--Matt
Why not give us a week to actually count, rather than making us guess.
I doubt anyone's actually been keeping a log.
1999\02\12@153017
by
Scott Dattalo
|
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Matt Bonner wrote:
> Which brings me to the poll.
>
> Crashes per work week:
> Win98 PC:
~1.5 times a week (7 crashes since 08Jan99)
> Win95 PC:
> DOS PC:
> Unix:
> Linux box:
once in the last 14 months (and that was because of a bad/experimental
network driver). So I guess that makes it 0.016 times per week. Linux has
never crashed on the two different computers I have at home. We do have an
experimental MKlinux kernel on one of our Macs at SRI that crashes about
once every three weeks.
> Mac:
> Amiga:
> ?:
>
> I'll tally the totals after next Monday's (Feb 22) morning email deluge.
Matt,
You've really opened a can of worms! My white board has tally of crash
statistics for Linux and Windows. One category I have is 'useless
restarts'. These are the times you have to reboot your PC because you've
made a change like installed new software, added a printer, edited your
network connection, ... I've got 14 since 08Jan99. Other categories are:
'ORCAD crashes', 'ORCAD sucks', and Linux Hacked. The last unfortunately
has a tick mark.
Scott
1999\02\12@154252
by
dave vanhorn
>
>You've really opened a can of worms! My white board has tally of crash
>statistics for Linux and Windows. One category I have is 'useless
>restarts'. These are the times you have to reboot your PC because you've
>made a change like installed new software, added a printer, edited your
>network connection, ... I've got 14 since 08Jan99. Other categories are:
>'ORCAD crashes', 'ORCAD sucks', and Linux Hacked. The last unfortunately
>has a tick mark.
>
>Scott
I'm suprised! I didn't think anyone would be tracking this routinely.
Is it for some other reason, or just your own perversity :)
(BTW: I run orcad too, but I stuck with the DOS version, it seemed more
stable than the wintel stuff)
1999\02\12@155538
by
Matt Bonner
dave vanhorn wrote:
>
> >I'll tally the totals after next Monday's (Feb 22) morning email deluge.
> >
> >--Matt
>
> Why not give us a week to actually count, rather than making us guess.
> I doubt anyone's actually been keeping a log.
Post 'em here - [OT] of course, or mail 'em direct, I'll keep the tally:
spam_OUTmbonnerTakeThisOuT
sunada.com
--Matt
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1999
, 2000 only
- Today
- New search...