Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'IR'
1995\07\06@014716
by
David B. Thomas
|
On Wed, 5 Jul 1995, Berard wrote:
> I've been following the discussion on IR communications
> with some interest, and have a question about the protocol
> used in commercial remote control units.
>
> I have several hand held remote control boxes for TVs, VCR, cable
> boxes etc., along with a 'multi-remote' unit that can be set to control
> 3 devices. I would like to be able to use one of these commercial
> transmitters to provide the control for one of my PIC projects.
>
> I have been playing around with the IR Control Receiver Modules from
> Digi-Key (LT1033-ND 32.7 KHz), and Radio Shack (GP1U52X 40 KHz)
Here's what I've come up with (with test equipment) so far. Generally the
remote controls use a carrier near 40 kc, which they then key on and off
at approximately 600 us per pulse (half-cycle). Message length is around
24 bits, usually shorter. There's an initial settling time that the
carrier is on, before the first bit. When a key is held down, most send the
code over and over. Some just send the code once, then go to a "holding
pattern", where a bit or two is sent at regular intervals while the key
is held. Generally I figured that if you wanted to make a "universal
learning remote" you'd have to just give up and use a brute force high
sample rate, like at least a sample every 250 us, preferably more than
that. I figured with a PIC16C57 you could just fit the information from
one blast in the 64 upper registers, then take your time writing it to
EEPROM. I have yet to try this out. If you wanted to mock a particular
remote, that would be much easier, as you've observed, since you can just
generate from the known timings.
One more thing I've found: those receiver modules are *great* for
receiver applications but not so good for learning remotes. The noise
from them can look a *lot* like signal. If you just use a
phototransistor and do the amplification yourself, you can just let the
sensitivity be very low, forcing the user to hold the transmitter right
up to the detector, and you'll get a more reliable signal. Come to think
of it, I've never seen a learning remote that was at all sensitive. I
guess someone else has been here.
David
--
Their address sums up their attitude: One Microsoft Way
http://www.rt66.com/dthomas/
1995\07\06@143537
by
Chuck McManis
There are a couple of good articles on IR in the current issue of Electronics
Now.
Title: Electronics Now (formerly Radio Electronics)
Publisher: Gernsback Publications Inc
Subscriptions: Subscription Dept
Box 55115
Boulder, CO 80321-5115
Editorial: 500-B Bi-County Boulevard
Farmingdale, NY 11735
Phone: (516) 293-3000
FAX: <none>
Cost: $19.97/yr
ISSN: 0033-7862
--Chuck
'IR'
2000\02\28@034630
by
Soon Lee
Hi guys
do anyone know what freq of modulation do normal remote control for vcr and
tv used?
regards
soon lee
2000\02\28@041816
by
berentse
2000\02\28@042853
by
Simon Bryden
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 04:48:13PM +0800, Soon Lee wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> do anyone know what freq of modulation do normal remote control for vcr and
> tv used?
Normally 40kHz, but 38kHz also commonly used.
Simon.
2000\02\28@103534
by
Wagner Lipnharski
For detailed information, see:
http://www.ustr.net/infrared
Soon Lee wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> do anyone know what freq of modulation do normal remote control for vcr and
> tv used?
>
> regards
> soon lee
2000\02\28@110234
by
Soon Lee
2000\02\28@110614
by
Soon Lee
2000\02\28@111705
by
Michael Rigby-Jones
part 0 3443 bytes
<P><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Neither can I. I'm getting a Forbidden error.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Regards</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Mike</FONT>
</P>
<UL>
<P><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Arial">{Original Message removed}
2000\02\28@114526
by
Quitt, Walter
2000\02\28@121228
by
Wagner Lipnharski
hmmm, some problems at the webserver... try the direct page:
http://www.ustr.net/infrared/infrared1.shtml
Wagner.
> Michael Rigby-Jones wrote:
>
> Neither can I. I'm getting a Forbidden error.
>
> Regards
>
> Mike
>
> {Original Message removed}
2000\02\29@124829
by
Soon Lee
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2000
, 2001 only
- Today
- New search...