Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'Effective Spamming on the NET FREE GUIDE (fwd)'
1995\08\09@140757
by
Eric L. Singer
1995\08\09@165539
by
PETE KLAMMER
|
>
> This comes via another spammed list. I suggest someone in New Mexico set
> their fax modem to auto-dial him 24/7.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 1995 11:13:39 -0500
> From: James McCartney <.....jamesKILLspam
.....ASTRO.AS.UTEXAS.EDU>
> To: Multiple recipients of list MAX <MAX%EraseMEMCGILL1.BITNETspam_OUT
TakeThisOuTACFcluster.NYU.EDU>
> Subject: Re: Effective Spamming on the NET FREE GUIDE
>
> Jeff Slaton in Alb. New Mexico is listed with the phone number:
> 505-822-8919
> Have fun!
>
> --- james mccartney james
spam_OUTastro.as.utexas.edu
This takes only a little bit of your time, and no money: call that number
COLLECT, and if he takes the call, explain briefly and politely what an
annoyance SPAM can be. I've done this before, and (surprise) one time they
took the call and apologetically explained that someone else had posted on
their behalf, lawyers were involved, etc. I thanked them for letting me
explain my annoyance. I haven't gotten through in this case yet. As I say,
it costs nothing to try, and if enough of us load up his phone ...
1995\08\10@021020
by
Clyde Smith-Stubbs
> > Jeff Slaton in Alb. New Mexico is listed with the phone number:
> > 505-822-8919
Here's another way a devious person might spam his phone number - call
one (or more) of the many faxback services and give his number to
send the fax to. He'll get three calls on his answering machine
before it gives up. For example, Intel has a faxback service on
1-800-525-3019 (in the USA). Of course I'm not suggesting you do this -
I imagine it could be construed as misuse of the phone system.
1995\08\10@033515
by
Lee Jones
>>> Jeff Slaton, Alb. New Mexico, listed with the phone number: 505-822-8919
>
> Here's another way a devious person might spam his phone number - call
> one (or more) of the many faxback services and give [Jeff's] number...
If one were to do this, one might want to know that some of the more
sophisticated faxback services use caller ID -- IBM's is an example.
They insert the phone number of the _requester_ (person placing the
order) into the facsimile which such a system then trys to transmit.
It's useful for interoffice routing purposes. But in this case, it
might be something you'd want to avoid.
I'm not suggesting, nor recommending, nor endorsing any specific
action... just passing on some information.
Lee Jones
1995\08\10@051922
by
Clyde Smith-Stubbs
> If one were to do this, one might want to know that some of the more
> sophisticated faxback services use caller ID -- IBM's is an example.
> They insert the phone number of the _requester_ (person placing the
> order) into the facsimile which such a system then trys to transmit.
I suspect this won't be a problem if the call is placed from overseas.
--
Clyde Smith-Stubbs | HI-TECH Software, | Voice: +61 7 3300 5011
@spam@clydeKILLspam
hitech.com.au | P.O. Box 103, Alderley, | Fax: +61 7 3300 5246
| QLD, 4051, AUSTRALIA. | BBS: +61 7 3300 5235
HI-TECH C: Compiling the real world...
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1995
, 1996 only
- Today
- New search...