Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'Concerned wether PIC 16C5X is adequate for my appl'
1996\05\12@153335
by
NEIL GANDLER
|
I am planning on using a PIC16C5X for a project. The project
doesnt require much mathematical computation or the highest speed. It
basically will be
1. Controlling and ultrasonic transmitter and receiver and
calculate object distance as an ultrasonic rangefinder.
2. Sending simple protocol signals to communicate with an
external device.
3. Performing simple logic and using the timer to perform
time dependent operations.
I am concerned about the limitation of the 5 series.
The reason I would like to use the 5 series is that I found a 5 series
emulator for about $200. Alot of people told me an emulator would save
alot of headaches when debugging and will save alot of time. My main question
is, what do the higher end PICs provide? I know I have enough RAM and EPROM for
my code and program.
1. Interrupts would be a conveninent features instead of polling, the 5 series
doesnt have them.
2. The maximum nested subroutine limit of 2 may cause a problem, not sure yet.
If a C compliler compensate for this, then it would be no problem.
3. Some extra independent timers would be a big help.
4. Is it worth using a higher end PIC and just write code with trial
and error.
Also, would any of you recommend using a C compiler to reduce the
time it takes to write code, the only problem is that the emulator
requires code in assembly and it may be alot of trouble trying to debug
the compiled assembly, than if I wrote the code myself in assembly.
Does anyone know where I can get a C compiler for 16C5X series and
find some examples?
I would appreciate any advice.
______________________________________________________________________________
Neil B. Gandler
University at Buffalo
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Masters of Engineering
spam_OUTv064mb9kTakeThisOuT
ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu
http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~gandler/
(716) 691-3471
Seeking career in Instrumentation and Digital System Design
San Jose, California August 1996
www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~gandler/resume.html
______________________________________________________________________________
1996\05\13@091557
by
Mike DeMetz
A 16C84 (EEPROM) is good for trial and error type programming.
I have seen some prototype boards that let you program them
in circuit.
**********************************************************
*Mike DeMetz SYSCON International *
*.....mikedKILLspam
@spam@syscon-intl.com South Bend, IN USA *
*aka 73165.1230
KILLspamcompuserve.com using Pegasus Mail *
**********************************************************
1996\05\13@121305
by
Daniel Henzulea
Hi Neil,
I just developed a system based on PIC16C84 and ultrasonic sensors (one
transmitter and one receiver). The system can evaluate distances betwen
0.1 and 6 m and send this to a PC on serial port. If you are interested in
code routines or schemes send me an e-mail at:
.....zuleaKILLspam
.....utcluj.ro
1996\05\14@074142
by
Alexandre Guimaraes
> I just developed a system based on PIC16C84 and ultrasonic sensors (one
> transmitter and one receiver). The system can evaluate distances betwen
> 0.1 and 6 m and send this to a PC on serial port. If you are interested in
> code routines or schemes send me an e-mail at:
í would be very interested in seing how you did it. It would be
perfect for a small robot I am planning to build. If you could e-mail
code and some details of the hardware I would be very grateful.
Thanks,
Alexandre Guimaraes
EraseMEalexgspam_OUT
TakeThisOuTiis.com.br
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1996
, 1997 only
- Today
- New search...