Roger,
Scenix (http://www.scenix.com) produces chips that have an almost identical
instruction set to PICs, but run *much* faster (a 50MHz SX18 runs 20
times faster than a 10MHz 16F84), and has twice as much program memory,
yet is available for a comparable price. When you have a uC this fast,
it becomes feasible to emulate hardware (eg. serial ports, modem, dsp
etc...) in software, and Scenix have released a number of such "virtual
peripherals". They've also apparently implemented a TCP/IP stack which
they will be releasing code for soon (although I think full TCP is only
available in the larger chips).
Cheers,
Ben
Roger Morella wrote:
{Quote hidden}>
> I am looking for some alternatives to Microchip's processors. I
> realized that I have been choosing PIC processors by default without
> adequately researching viable alternatives.
>
> Therefore I think a discussion regarding alternative processors is
> appropriate. I encourage any comments that include alternate
> manufacturers, prices, and pro's and con's of processors that compete
> eithor directly or indirectly with Microchip's products.
>
> What processor have you used that compete's with Microchip?
>
> How much was it?
>
> What were the main features?
>
> How was delivery?
>
> Why did you choose it?
>
> What is the closest Microchip product and how does it compare?