Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'12C508 vs. 16c84'
1998\08\26@062719
by
Ake Hedman, eurosource
This is probably a VERY stupid question but I get very confused when I read
the docs on different PIC devices.
I have used 16C84 and according to the docs it has EPROM memory. Still I
don't need to UV erase and can reprograme the device as needed. ( I never
understood why the C was not an F from the beginning.
When I read about the 12C508 device I get the impression that is an EPROM
device and that I need to erase it with UV light. Or does this chip
erase/program just the same way as the 16C84?
Can someone clear up my confusion!?
Regards
/Ake
1998\08\26@064429
by
Mike Ghormley
|
Ake Hedman, eurosource wrote:
> I have used 16C84 and according to the docs it has EPROM memory. Still I
> don't need to UV erase and can reprograme the device as needed. ( I never
> understood why the C was not an F from the beginning.
>
> When I read about the 12C508 device I get the impression that is an EPROM
> device and that I need to erase it with UV light. Or does this chip
> erase/program just the same way as the 16C84?
The 16C84 is an EEPROM device. The non-volatile memory is electrically erasable
, thus
can be erased without UV light.
The 16F84 is a FLASH memory device. The non-volatile memory is also electricall
y
erasable and does not require UV light.
The 12C508/9 come in two flavors:
1) the 12C508-04/P which is a One Time Programmable (OTP) part. No erasures are
possible under normal circumstances.
2) the 12C508-04/JW which is a UV-erasable windowed part. It may be erased usin
g UV
light.
AFAIK the two parts (P and JW) are identical except for the case. Thus, the OTP
part
has an EPROM non-volatile memory, but lacks the window to allow for erasing.
Michael
*************************************************************************
When the way of the Tao is forgotten, kindness and ethics must be taught.
Men must learn to pretend to be wise and good. -- Lao Tzu
*************************************************************************
1998\08\26@064641
by
Stefan Sczekalla-Waldschmidt
Dear Ake,
your impression is ok. 16C(F)8X uses a kind of EE_PROM Technology while
12c508 uses E_PROM technology with OTP devices in plastic case and
UV-erasable devices in a windowed cerdip package (Case = JW) ( an much
mor expensiv ).
Ake Hedman, eurosource wrote:
>
> This is probably a VERY stupid question but I get very confused when I read
> the docs on different PIC devices.
>
> I have used 16C84 and according to the docs it has EPROM memory. Still I
> don't need to UV erase and can reprograme the device as needed. ( I never
> understood why the C was not an F from the beginning.
I got confused by this too...
> When I read about the 12C508 device I get the impression that is an EPROM
> device and that I need to erase it with UV light. Or does this chip
> erase/program just the same way as the 16C84?
>
> Can someone clear up my confusion!?
>
> Regards
> /Ake
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1998
, 1999 only
- Today
- New search...