Searching \ for '[admin]: PICLIST vs piclist. Two lists...' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Search entire site for: ': PICLIST vs piclist. Two lists...'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[admin]: PICLIST vs piclist. Two lists...'
2003\02\21@124330 by Robert Rolf

picon face
Hi Gang,

As bad luck and fatigue would have it, the piclist messages headers I
checked for the 'reply-to:', before posting here, were for the yahoo piclist
[piclist] and not for [PICLIST] on MIT. Just bad luck that the usually
low activity yahoogroup happened to have a burst of messages, and I didn't
notice the slightly different tag (lower case instead of upper). ARRRGHH!.
The reference to yahoo should have been a clue, but it wouldn't be the
first time that someone thought the MIT list was a yahoo list.

Since the reply to: header was missing, my apologies for misdirecting
my response to this list. However, it doesn't change my strong feelings that
a list such as this should be set to reply to the list, not the
individual poster (like the yahoo list).

The 'other' piclist is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/piclist/
and the archives are public.

Once again, my apologies for screwing up. The up side is that you
now know about another PIC list which has around 40 posts a month.
And I promise won't post anything when I'm really tired.

Robert

Ironically Dwayne's message from/for the MIT piclist does NOT have a
reply-to: header. Probably a BCC: where the original didn't make it
through the tag filter.

Dwayne Reid wrote:
{Quote hidden}

[zap]
{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\02\21@151706 by Dwayne Reid

flavicon
face
At 10:42 AM 2/21/03 -0700, Robert Rolf wrote:
>Hi Gang,
>
>Ironically Dwayne's message from/for the MIT piclist does NOT have a
>reply-to: header. Probably a BCC: where the original didn't make it
>through the tag filter.

Yeah - I sent a BCC: direct to you, Robert, just in case you had already
done the unthinkable ;).  That message didn't come from the Listserv and
thus wouldn't have the Reply To: header set.

BTW - did you also see the copy of the post that WAS sent to the list?  I'm
starting to get a nagging feeling that many of my posts are not making it
through.

dwayne

--
Dwayne Reid   <spam_OUTdwaynerTakeThisOuTspamplanet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice          (780) 487-6397 fax

Celebrating 19 years of Engineering Innovation (1984 - 2003)
 .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-
    `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'
Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to this email address.
This message neither grants consent to receive unsolicited
commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial email.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2003 , 2004 only
- Today
- New search...