Searching \ for '[TECH]:: TECH membership' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=tech+membership
Search entire site for: ':: TECH membership'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[TECH]:: TECH membership'
2008\07\14@090445 by Apptech

face
flavicon
face
I'd be interested in knowing how many people

1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
unsubscribe.

Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
de-lurk visibly.

Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.



       Russell


2008\07\14@092817 by Carl Denk

flavicon
face
Have explicitly subscribed to TECH

Will have to see how this shakes out. Have previously subscribed only to PIC and EE. Sometimes a thread seems to go on and on with little new info, and probably I have contributed to that :( also. Too much mail, using delete key without reading message, but then again there is detail of use to others, kind of grin and bear (bare (sp)) it.:)

And I am guilty of seeking help on stuff that is now considered off topic (Linux and Windows), where I have exhausted other more pertinent forums and found the solution here. Moderating should be somewhat tolerant, if only occasional  and not abused.

Overall, think the list is good. :)



Apptech wrote:
{Quote hidden}

2008\07\14@095453 by Picbits Sales

flavicon
face
I'm getting it automagically without having to change anything in my Piclist
settings.

I think I've got mine to receive all posts

Dom
{Original Message removed}

2008\07\14@095547 by Bob Ammerman

picon face
I opted in
--- Bob Ammerman

----- Original Message -----
From: "Apptech" <spam_OUTapptechTakeThisOuTspamparadise.net.nz>
To: "PIC List" <.....PICLISTKILLspamspam@spam@MIT.EDU>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:02 AM
Subject: [TECH]:: TECH membership


{Quote hidden}

> --

2008\07\14@100030 by Roger, in Bangkok

face
flavicon
face
This isn't a trick question is it ... ?  Ya still got me all bamboozled over
that nonsense that OT doesn't stand for On Topic!

Okay, okay I'll slither back into lurch mode now ...

RiB

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Apptech <apptechspamKILLspamparadise.net.nz> wrote:

{Quote hidden}

2008\07\14@100641 by Derward Myrick

picon face
Apptech,  I am receiving TECH tag material automatically without doing
amything.

Derward



----- Original Message -----
From: "Apptech" <.....apptechKILLspamspam.....paradise.net.nz>
To: "PIC List" <EraseMEPICLISTspam_OUTspamTakeThisOuTmit.edu>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:02 AM
Subject: [TECH]:: TECH membership


> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
<snip>
>        Russell

<snip>


2008\07\14@101532 by Roger, in Bangkok

face
flavicon
face
DANG Russell!  You mean we been disruptin' all those 'lectrons for naught in
order to opt in?!  Sorry, I forgot to mention that I opted in ... and don't
even think for a nanosecond that I'm gonna unscribledebibble and let ya off
the hook!

RiB

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Derward Myrick <wdmyrickspamspam_OUTearthlink.net>
wrote:

> Apptech,  I am receiving TECH tag material automatically without doing
> amything.
>
> Derward
>
> ...
>

2008\07\14@102430 by Bob Axtell

face picon face
I plan to subscribe ASAP. Busy.

--Bob

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Apptech <@spam@apptechKILLspamspamparadise.net.nz> wrote:

{Quote hidden}

> -

2008\07\14@102844 by Jake Anderson

flavicon
face
I started doing stuff to get it,
forgot my password then ran out of time
but i still seem to be getting it ;->

Derward Myrick wrote:
{Quote hidden}

2008\07\14@103651 by D. Daniel McGlothin

flavicon
face
I "Have explicitly subscribed to TECH".

Daniel

2008\07\14@103756 by Dave Lagzdin

picon face
2008/7/14 Apptech <spamBeGoneapptechspamBeGonespamparadise.net.nz>:

> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
>
opted-in, (#2)
D

2008\07\14@105746 by Dwayne Reid

flavicon
face
(2) for me - I had to explicitly subscribe.

dwayne


At 07:02 AM 7/14/2008, Apptech wrote:
{Quote hidden}

--
Dwayne Reid   <TakeThisOuTdwaynerEraseMEspamspam_OUTplanet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice          (780) 487-6397 fax
http://www.trinity-electronics.com
Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing

2008\07\14@112447 by James Bendall

flavicon
face
Apptech wrote:
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.

That one!

--
James

2008\07\14@113106 by Don Kovalchik - W8DPK

flavicon
face
I had to opt-in.  Receiving posts just fine now.

Back to lurking . .

--Don--


Apptech wrote:

{Quote hidden}

2008\07\14@115118 by Peter Todd

flavicon
face
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.

Have always subscribed to everything, and use my email clients
thread-delete button with abandon... :)

- --
http://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIe2983bMhDbI9xWQRAidfAJ9w+kFFCRzL8jdT7a7uTDxs+1QwKwCffs9R
nQbgD17jSxVqQn7ZNq06EVM=
=bE33
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2008\07\14@121701 by Gaston Gagnon

face
flavicon
face
Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
>  
I do not know if I would have received TECH automatically because I
immediately explicitly subscribed (#2) when the news was out.
Gaston

2008\07\14@130745 by Bob Barr

flavicon
face
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:02:26 +1200, Apptech wrote:

>I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
>1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>unsubscribe.


2. I "Have explicitly subscribed to TECH".

Regards, Bob

2008\07\14@133630 by Yair Mahalalel

flavicon
face
Confirmed infoholic with an Apptech habit. Did nothing to subscribe. The
system knows.

Yair.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote:
{Quote hidden}

> --

2008\07\14@151023 by Vic Fraenckel

picon face
Carl Denk wrote:
{Quote hidden}

1. Receiving automatically
2. Did NOT subscribe to TECH
3. Will wait and see

Vic

--

*____________________________________________________________________________________________*

*Victor Fraenckel
KC2GUI
windswaytoo ATSIGN gmail DOT com**
*

2008\07\14@155534 by peter green

flavicon
face
>1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
I was set to subscribe to everything and still get everything including
tech.
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>  
Afiact this only happened if you were previously set to receive
everything. Since afaict TECH is meant to fit somewhere between EE and
OT I would hope that there would be very few if any people in this category.

2008\07\14@161644 by Richard Prosser

picon face
1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.

Went to the website to opt-in and found I didn't have to change anything.

RP


2008/7/15 Apptech <RemoveMEapptechspamTakeThisOuTparadise.net.nz>:
{Quote hidden}

> -

2008\07\14@172603 by William \Chops\ Westfield

face picon face

On Jul 14, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Apptech wrote:

> I'd be interested in knowing how many people

I am receiving TECH automatically, as a result of never
having turned on ANY filtering.

BillW

2008\07\14@181101 by Heinz Czychun

flavicon
face
Hi to all fellow Techies,

       I explicitly subscribed, not wanting to miss a bit, #2.

TTFN,
Heinz

On 14-Jul-08, at 9:02 AM, Apptech wrote:

> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>

2008\07\14@190726 by cdb

flavicon
face
I'm a number 2, quite few people I suspect, agree as well!

Colin

:: I'd be interested in knowing how many people
::
:: 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
:: 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
:: 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
:: unsubscribe.
--
cdb, colinEraseMEspam.....btech-online.co.uk on 15/07/2008

Web presence: http://www.btech-online.co.uk  

Hosted by:  http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=7988359

Friendship multiplies the good of life and divides the evil.
Baltasar Gracian





2008\07\14@225510 by Andrew Burchill

picon face
:: 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>

autopilot for me, think I'm receiving all channels anyway.

Andrew Burchill

2008\07\15@030104 by Artem Zezyulinskiy

flavicon
face
I'm receiving it automatically.

Artem

Apptech a écrit :
{Quote hidden}

>

2008\07\15@084449 by Gerhard Fiedler

picon face
Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>  
I normally read the piclist through gmane.org, and their account doesn't
seem to receive TECH. So for now I'm without, until I change my habits
and my setup.

FWIW, I notified the person who seems to run gmane.org, but he seems to
have better things to do :)

Gerhard

2008\07\15@120249 by Paul Hutchinson

picon face
Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>  

#2, I explicitly subscribed to TECH

Paul Hutch

2008\07\15@123047 by Alex Harford

face picon face
Missed your original email because,
> #2, I explicitly subscribed to TECH

2008\07\15@125407 by Alan Schnittman

picon face

#2.  Back to lurking...


At 09:02 AM 7/14/2008, you wrote:
>I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
>1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>unsubscribe.
>
>Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
>de-lurk visibly.
>
>Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
>TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
>        Russell
>

2008\07\15@183741 by Howard Winter

face
flavicon
picon face
Russell,

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:02:26 +1200, Apptech wrote:

> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.

I didn't even realise a TECH tag had been added until I started to see messages with it!

I suppose I was automatically subscribed.  I've just written a filter to place anything with this tag into the (new) "folder" I've created for it, as I do with each PIClist
tag.

Cheers,


Howard Winter
St.Albans, England


2008\07\25@075303 by Matthew Rhys-Roberts

flavicon
face
#1 applies to me  :)

I didn't know it was possible to un/subscribe other tags. Or I'd
forgotten there was an email list preferences form somewhere.

Matt
Wrexham, UK


Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>  

2008\07\25@131835 by Sean Breheny

face picon face
Same here.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Picbits Sales <EraseMEsalesspampicbits.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm getting it automagically without having to change anything in my Piclist
> settings.
>
> I think I've got mine to receive all posts
>
> Dom
> {Original Message removed}

2008\07\25@143209 by Stephen D. Barnes

flavicon
face
>
>>> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>>>
>>> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>>> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>>> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>>> unsubscribe.
>>>      
#2 for me.

--
Regards,
Stephen D. Barnes

2008\07\27@031829 by Ray Warren

picon face
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote:

> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1.    Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2.    Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3.    Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
>         Russell
I am receiving the TECH material automatically.I do not have any filters
set on the piclist site,
Ray Warren


'[TECH]:: TECH membership'
2008\08\17@180328 by Dario Greggio
face picon face
Picbits Sales wrote:
> I'm getting it automagically without having to change anything in my Piclist
> settings.

same here


--
Ciao, Dario -- ADPM Synthesis sas -- http://www.adpm.tk

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2008 , 2009 only
- Today
- New search...