Searching \ for '[SX] SX28 with Hardware ADC' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/ubicom/lib/io/index.htm?key=ato+adc
Search entire site for: 'SX28 with Hardware ADC'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[SX] SX28 with Hardware ADC'
2005\07\02@123353 by heroldn/a

flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, herold wrote:

I just ordered the SX28 development kit and I would like to sample from my external build white noise generator.

Reading about the virtual programmed AD I came to the conclusion that it is too slow. Do you know of any good AD chip that is simple to use with the SX28? What max sample rate can I expect?

---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

2005\07\02@205431 by dpatonn/a

flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, dpaton wrote:

Herold-
Max sample rate will be as much a function of your program as of the external ADC. With flash ADCs on the market capable of hundreds of millions of samples per second, you're entirely limited by how tight you can code and how much you want to spend.

What do you consider "fast"?
What kind of interface do you need? SPI, I2C, parallel?
What kind of money can you spend on parts?
What else will your processor need to do in between samples?

These are all things we need to know before we can help further...

-dave
---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249#m79277
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

2005\07\02@213607 by heroldn/a

flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, herold wrote:

Hello Dave,
Thank you for the reply. Basically I want to sample a signal (white noise) as fast as possible (8 Bit) and than send the sample data via serial to the PC. So, there is not much program vode, I guess.

I am working with Realbasic on the PC and the fastest baud rate there is 500K. So this is my limit. Everything else should be not slower than this.

I already have some AD 8 BIT chips from Maxim (MAX153/Max114) which do up to 1Mhz sample rate.

---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249#m79280
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

2005\07\02@224604 by Peter Van der Zeen/a

flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, Peter Van der Zee wrote:

Hi Herold;
So what you are indirectly saying the 500Kbits/sec is your choking point.

At 10 serial time bits per 8 bit A/D reading that is 50 KSamples/sec. or 20 Usec per conversion.

I would expect the practical limit on an SX virtual 8 bit A/D would be 50 uSec per sample.

But here is a question in approaching your problem in a different (easier?) manner...... why not generate the white noise with a pseudo-random (noise) sequence?

That's real easy to do with an SX.

Perhaps there is a good reason that I don't understand.

Cheers,
Peter (pjv)
---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249#m79287
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

2005\07\03@111750 by heroldn/a
flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, herold wrote:

Hello Peter,
So what you saying is that the SX is good enough for what I want to do. Yes, I need a true white noise generator (generated with a diode or transistor) for what I want to do.

---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249#m79328
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

2005\07\03@130844 by Peter Van der Zeen/a

flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, Peter Van der Zee wrote:

Hi Herold;
No, that not quite what I said. At best the SX can probably only do about 20,000 8 bit conversions per second, and you wanted things to run as fast as the maximum serial bit rate of 500 kbits/second, and that translates to a desired conversion rate of 50,000 samples per second. So the SX can't do what you want that way. An external A/D is required and I don't want to spend the time to research for you what you should be able to find on your own.

But can you please explain to me why an SX generated pseudo-noise sequence would not work? You'd be able to get higher frequencies than 8 bits times 50,000 per second.....

Cheers,
Peter (pjv)
---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249#m79332
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

2005\07\03@151312 by heroldn/a

flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, herold wrote:

Hello Peter,
Thanks for the quick reply. I wanted to use an external AD (MAX153/Max114) because I was aware of the speed limitations on a virtual AD.

I do conciousness research with this tool as the diode act as an transmitter between conciousness and the physical reality. Princeton did a lot of research on it. A pseudo random generator did not work in their experiments.

With an external AD I should meet my requirements, yes?

---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249#m79340
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

2005\07\03@155856 by Peter Van der Zeen/a

flavicon
face
In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, Peter Van der Zee wrote:

Herold;
The external A/D you choose will determine the capabilities.

Peter (pjv)
---------- End of Message ----------

You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=79249#m79344
Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com
The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2005 , 2006 only
- Today
- New search...