Searching \ for ' MPLAB 5.5 and Hitech C' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/languages.htm?key=mplab
Search entire site for: 'MPLAB 5.5 and Hitech C'.

No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList Thread
'[PICLIST] MPLAB 5.5 and Hitech C'
2002\02\21@060731 by Michael Rigby-Jones

flavicon
face
Has anyone come accross any compatiblity problems with the latest verison of
MPLAB (5.5)?  I installed it recently, and tried to rebuild some projects I
was working on and MPLAB told me my build tools were not installed
correctly.  After extensive head scratching, it seems that MPLAB5.5 refers
to the Hitech tools as "PICC Linker", PICC Compiler" and "PICC Assembler".
The previous version I was using (I think 5.4 but not aboslutely sure),
refered to them as "PIC-C Linker", "PIC-C Compiler" etc.  After manualy
editing the project files they built correctly.  I've not seen anything
mentioned so I wonder if this is unique to my system?

Also, eveytime I use the ProMate through MPLAB, it whinges that I don't have
the latest firmware installed, although I have programmed it with the
version that comes with MPLAB 5.5, and I can't find any newer version.

Regards

Mike

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


2002\02\21@070210 by Francisco Ares

flavicon
face
I am also running MPLAB 5.5 and Hitech  C compiler, and have gone
trhough the same problems that you pointed out.  The 5.5 version is a
little bit buggy, also: when I set more than a couple of breakpoints,
the program crashes. Seriously, I am thinking in getting back to 5.4 !!

I can't wait to have MPLAB 5.6 ;-)

Best regards to all PIC listers
Francisco

Michael Rigby-Jones wrote:

{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


2002\02\21@084341 by Rick C.

flavicon
face
5.5 is written in PASCAL. 16 bit technology written for dos. It has been patched
to death to work in windows. Some bugs are still being dealt with. Latest news is
that a new 32 bit version is in the works. Probably written in VB.
Rick

Francisco Ares wrote:

{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


'[PICLIST] AW: [PIC]: MPLAB 5.5 and Hitech C'
2002\02\21@112129 by Jens

flavicon
face
> 5.5 is written in PASCAL. 16 bit technology written for dos. It
> has been patched
> to death to work in windows. Some bugs are still being dealt
> with. Latest news is
> that a new 32 bit version is in the works. Probably written in VB.

And will be called MPLAB32.
Release date will be in 2-3 month.

Best Jens

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


'[PICLIST] MPLAB 5.5 and Hitech C'
2002\02\21@114051 by Dipperstein, Michael

face picon face
> From: Michael Rigby-Jones [spam_OUTmrjonesTakeThisOuTspamNORTELNETWORKS.COM]
>
> Has anyone come accross any compatiblity problems with the
> latest verison of
> MPLAB (5.5)?  I installed it recently, and tried to rebuild
> some projects I
> was working on and MPLAB told me my build tools were not installed
> correctly.  After extensive head scratching, it seems that
> MPLAB5.5 refers
> to the Hitech tools as "PICC Linker", PICC Compiler" and
> "PICC Assembler".
> The previous version I was using (I think 5.4 but not
> aboslutely sure),
> refered to them as "PIC-C Linker", "PIC-C Compiler" etc.
> After manualy
> editing the project files they built correctly.  I've not
> seen anything
> mentioned so I wonder if this is unique to my system?

[...]

> Mike

Both Hi-Tech and Microchip are aware of this problem.  From what I've been told
the names have been changed at Hi-Tech's request.  Hi-Tech has a utility that
will update all of your old project files to make them work correctly.  You can
download the utility from
http://www.htsoft.com/software/updates/mplab/update.htm

-Mike

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


2002\02\21@131017 by Bob Ammerman

picon face
> > that a new 32 bit version is in the works. Probably written in VB.

Almost certain it is VC++. At least that's what I gleaned when talking to
the MPLAB 6 development team while at the Master's last summer. I think
those of us in the dsPIC classes were the very first non-mChip people to
actually use MPLAB 6 and the developers were hanging around to get our
feedback.

Bob Ammerman
RAm  Systems

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


2002\02\21@132250 by Nick Veys

flavicon
face
> > > that a new 32 bit version is in the works. Probably written in VB.
>
> Almost certain it is VC++. At least that's what I gleaned
> when talking to the MPLAB 6 development team while at the
> Master's last summer. I think those of us in the dsPIC
> classes were the very first non-mChip people to actually use
> MPLAB 6 and the developers were hanging around to get our feedback.

I'd be quite interested in hearing some of that feedback! :)

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


2002\02\21@133305 by Bob Ammerman

picon face
As I posted shortly after the Masters, at the time it was quite buggy, but
the basic structure seemed to make quite a bit of sense. It is a little
different from any other IDE I've used, so there were some issues with that.
I expect we'll all soon grow to love it as a much better replacement for
5.5.

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems

{Original Message removed}

2002\02\21@140948 by Mahmood Elnasser
flavicon
face
Wish they make their editor colored like proper c editors for code
readability, there current editor really sucks!


{Original Message removed}

2002\02\21@192922 by Matt Pobursky

flavicon
face
Since every programmer has their own favorite editor [editors are
like women, everyone's taste is a bit different... ;-)], I have
been asking them for at least 5 years to let us hook any 3rd
party editor and use that.

At least 2 or 3 other IDE's I use have this feature. No editor
that comes with MPLAB will ever match the features and usefulness
of CodeRight, Multi-Edit, Visual SlickEdit, or even a shareware
editor like UltraEdit32. Even if it did, it wouldn't be the
editor you want to use...

Matt Pobursky
Maximum Performance Systems

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:11:14 +0200, Mahmood Elnasser wrote:
>Wish they make their editor colored like proper c editors for
>code readability, there current editor really sucks!
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2002 , 2003 only
- Today
- New search...