Searching \ for ' Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Search entire site for: 'Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding'.

No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList Thread
'[PICLIST] Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding '
2002\06\20@023358 by Martin Buehler

flavicon
face
beside asics, there are also fpgas, which could eventually be
interresting. with an altera 7128, you can get 84 outputs for about $9, or
if you are happy with 0/3.3V, it drops by $1.
for series production, you can migrate an altera design to clear logic.
they produce asics based on fpga designs, with no nre cost. this drops the
price by about 2.





Tal Dayan <spam_OUTtalTakeThisOuTspamZAPTA.COM>
Gesendet von: pic microcontroller discussion list <.....PICLISTKILLspamspam@spam@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
20.06.02 06:17
Bitte antworten an pic microcontroller discussion list


       An:     PICLISTspamKILLspamMITVMA.MIT.EDU
       Kopie:
       Thema:  [PIC]: cheapest way for adding output pins ?


Hello,

One of the designs I am working needs many (100 to 200) outputs pins (0/5V
signal) controlled by a single mid size PIC. What is the cheapest way
(cents
per output pin) adding output pins to a PIC ?

This is a mass production product but an ASIC is out of question at this
point.

Speed is not an a primary issue so using reasonable serial communication
is
OK.

Thanks,

Tal

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
.....piclist-unsubscribe-requestKILLspamspam.....mitvma.mit.edu

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
EraseMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestspam_OUTspamTakeThisOuTmitvma.mit.edu


2002\06\20@072415 by Bob Ammerman

picon face
74HC595 gives you serial in 8 out with a latch, exactly what you need.

0.032 each at Digikey in 100's 16pin SOIC

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems


{Original Message removed}

2002\06\20@073504 by Bob Ammerman

picon face
er... that should be 0.32 each, not 0.032 each.

Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Ammerman" <rammermanspamspam_OUTADELPHIA.NET>
To: <@spam@PICLISTKILLspamspamMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding output pins ?


{Quote hidden}

or
> > if you are happy with 0/3.3V, it drops by $1.
> > for series production, you can migrate an altera design to clear logic.
> > they produce asics based on fpga designs, with no nre cost. this drops
the
> > price by about 2.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Tal Dayan <spamBeGonetalspamBeGonespamZAPTA.COM>
> > Gesendet von: pic microcontroller discussion list
<TakeThisOuTPICLISTEraseMEspamspam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
{Quote hidden}

(0/5V
{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
RemoveMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestspam_OUTspamKILLspammitvma.mit.edu


2002\06\20@111421 by Tal Dayan

flavicon
face
Which result in about 4c per output pin.

Translated to CPLD, 100 output device should
cost 4$. Is this a reasonable price for a 100 output pin CPLD (or metal mask
equivalent) in large quantities ?

Tal

> {Original Message removed}

2002\06\20@111441 by Tal Dayan
flavicon
face
7$ for a 84 pin PLD (clear logic) translates to about 8c per output. About
double than
using 595 shift registers.

Is it so ? Any cheaper alternative ?

Thanks,

Tal

> {Original Message removed}

2002\06\20@114934 by Alan B. Pearce

face picon face
>7$ for a 84 pin PLD (clear logic) translates to
>about 8c per output. About double than
>using 595 shift registers.

>Is it so ? Any cheaper alternative ?

Do not forget to factor in assembly costs, which will be significant for
that number of 595 devices, and could soon get you to the
programmed/assembled PLD cost.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
RemoveMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestTakeThisOuTspamspammitvma.mit.edu


2002\06\20@132850 by Matt Pobursky

flavicon
face
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:49:43 +0100, Alan B. Pearce wrote:
>>7$ for a 84 pin PLD (clear logic) translates to
>>about 8c per output. About double than
>>using 595 shift registers.
>
>>Is it so ? Any cheaper alternative ?
>
>Do not forget to factor in assembly costs, which will be
>significant for
>that number of 595 devices, and could soon get you to the
>programmed/assembled PLD cost.

And also PCB real estate area too. A 10mm or 14mm 100pin TQFP
takes up a whole lot less PCB area than the multitude of '595 SO
devices you'll need. There are lots of factors in the "true cost"
of a design, besides Bill of Material cost (which people many
times forget).

Matt Pobursky
Maximum Performance Systems

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
EraseMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestspamspamspamBeGonemitvma.mit.edu


2002\06\20@164457 by Bob Ammerman

picon face
A comment was made on this thread that the shift register solution required
many packages vs a CPLD or some such. Here are some counterarguments:

1: The packages involved are quite small (SO16) and don't take up all that
much space (how big is a 100 pin CPLD).

2: Since you only have to route a serial and two clock signals to each shift
register, so you can distribute them on the board to be close to their point
of use.

3: The lower density may permit the user of a 2-layer instead of 4-layer (or
more) board.

Also, the 0.32 price each at 100 drops quite a bit in larger quantites. How
about 0.1875 each in SO16 qty 10000 on tape and reel? That is a total of
0.1875 * 13 = $2.44 parts cost per board.

Sometimes simple is just what you need.

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tal Dayan" <RemoveMEtalKILLspamspamZAPTA.COM>
To: <PICLISTSTOPspamspamspam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding output pins ?


> Which result in about 4c per output pin.
>
> Translated to CPLD, 100 output device should
> cost 4$. Is this a reasonable price for a 100 output pin CPLD (or metal
mask
> equivalent) in large quantities ?
>
> Tal
>
> > {Original Message removed}

2002\06\20@172145 by Spehro Pefhany

picon face
At 04:39 PM 6/20/02 -0400, you wrote:

>Also, the 0.32 price each at 100 drops quite a bit in larger quantites. How
>about 0.1875 each in SO16 qty 10000 on tape and reel? That is a total of
>0.1875 * 13 = $2.44 parts cost per board.

Philips parts from Pioneer: 0.175 ea. one reel at a time (2500) ($438.50 total)
or 0.164 in 10K.  Or 0.137 in 4000 up from Avnet ($548 for 4K) (but no
stock there).
that's down to $1.78 per board parts cost, before further shopping around,
for a
quantity of only 300 boards (another advantage of using multiple cheap
parts, you
get the 4,000 price on the SRs, but only the 100's price on the bigger chips).
BTW, SSOP packages are offered too.

>Sometimes simple is just what you need.

Boring, available from multiple sources, works like a charm. Yup.

Best regards,

Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
spamBeGonespeffSTOPspamspamEraseMEinterlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
9/11 United we Stand

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
KILLspampiclist-unsubscribe-requestspamBeGonespammitvma.mit.edu


2002\06\20@181329 by Matt Pobursky

flavicon
face
More counterarguments... ;)

On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:39:07 -0400, Bob Ammerman wrote:
>A comment was made on this thread that the shift register
>solution required
>many packages vs a CPLD or some such. Here are some
>counterarguments:
>
>1: The packages involved are quite small (SO16) and don't take
>up all that
>much space (how big is a 100 pin CPLD).

About twice the space of (2) SO16's for a 14mm 100pin TQFP.

>2: Since you only have to route a serial and two clock signals
>to each shift
>register, so you can distribute them on the board to be close to
>their point
>of use.

That's true. If you are already working with a large physical
board then many IC's close to their termination makes sense.

>3: The lower density may permit the user of a 2-layer instead of
>4-layer (or
>more) board.

I routinely use 100+ pin CPLD's on 2 layer boards -- although 4
layers does make power/grounding easier and better. One other
factor though is that with the CPLD you have a lot of lattitude
in assigning pinouts such that you can "octopus" out from the
pins directly to their destination by judicious pin assignment.
In a current design I have a I/O expander type CPLD design that
has 48 digital I/O lines and zero vias on their traces.

>Also, the 0.32 price each at 100 drops quite a bit in larger
>quantites. How
>about 0.1875 each in SO16 qty 10000 on tape and reel? That is a
>total of
>0.1875 * 13 = $2.44 parts cost per board.

Parts cost will always be lower with discrete logic. I learned
that long ago. But sometimes the other physical and performance
related characteristics make the CPLD route a good choice too.

>Sometimes simple is just what you need.

Agreed.

Matt Pobursky
Maximum Performance Systems

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
EraseMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestspamEraseMEmitvma.mit.edu


2002\06\20@182740 by Pic Dude

flavicon
face
Curious -- what exactly is "Antwort" that I occassionally
see in the subject line of these messages?  I thought I
was up to date on the piclist and internet jargon, but I
may have missed this one.

Cheers,
-Neil.




{Original Message removed}

2002\06\20@183620 by Andrew Warren

flavicon
face
Pic Dude <@spam@PICLIST@spam@spamspam_OUTmitvma.mit.edu> wrote:

> Curious -- what exactly is "Antwort" that I occassionally
> see in the subject line of these messages?

   It's German for the English word "answer"; in an email subject,
   it means the same as "reply:" or "re:".

   -Andy

=== Andrew Warren -- spamBeGoneaiwspamKILLspamcypress.com
=== Principal Design Engineer
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
===
=== Opinions expressed above do not
=== necessarily represent those of
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
.....piclist-unsubscribe-requestspam_OUTspammitvma.mit.edu


2002\06\20@190031 by Mike Singer

picon face
  Folks!
  Do not be afraid to stick more then one PIC on PCB!
  PCB can carry double!
  With each 16F871 you get about 30 extra I/Os for < $2
in mass purchase. With Atmel Mega or TI MSP it looks even
better.
  Good Luck!
  Mike.

Bob Ammerman wrote:

{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
TakeThisOuTpiclist-unsubscribe-request.....spamTakeThisOuTmitvma.mit.edu


More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2002 , 2003 only
- Today
- New search...