No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList
Thread
'[PICLIST] Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding '
2002\06\20@023358
by
Martin Buehler
2002\06\20@072415
by
Bob Ammerman
74HC595 gives you serial in 8 out with a latch, exactly what you need.
0.032 each at Digikey in 100's 16pin SOIC
Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
{Original Message removed}
2002\06\20@073504
by
Bob Ammerman
|
er... that should be 0.32 each, not 0.032 each.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Ammerman" <rammerman
spam_OUTADELPHIA.NET>
To: <@spam@PICLISTKILLspam
MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding output pins ?
{Quote hidden}> 74HC595 gives you serial in 8 out with a latch, exactly what you need.
>
> 0.032 each at Digikey in 100's 16pin SOIC
>
> Bob Ammerman
> RAm Systems
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Buehler" <
KILLspamMartin.BuehlerKILLspam
ASCOM.CH>
> To: <
RemoveMEPICLISTTakeThisOuT
MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:32 AM
> Subject: Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding output pins ?
>
>
> > beside asics, there are also fpgas, which could eventually be
> > interresting. with an altera 7128, you can get 84 outputs for about $9,
or
> > if you are happy with 0/3.3V, it drops by $1.
> > for series production, you can migrate an altera design to clear logic.
> > they produce asics based on fpga designs, with no nre cost. this drops
the
> > price by about 2.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Tal Dayan <spamBeGonetalspamBeGone
ZAPTA.COM>
> > Gesendet von: pic microcontroller discussion list
<TakeThisOuTPICLISTEraseME
spam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
{Quote hidden}> > 20.06.02 06:17
> > Bitte antworten an pic microcontroller discussion list
> >
> >
> > An:
RemoveMEPICLIST
TakeThisOuTMITVMA.MIT.EDU
> > Kopie:
> > Thema: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding output pins ?
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > One of the designs I am working needs many (100 to 200) outputs pins
(0/5V
{Quote hidden}
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
RemoveMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestspam_OUT
KILLspammitvma.mit.edu
2002\06\20@111421
by
Tal Dayan
Which result in about 4c per output pin.
Translated to CPLD, 100 output device should
cost 4$. Is this a reasonable price for a 100 output pin CPLD (or metal mask
equivalent) in large quantities ?
Tal
> {Original Message removed}
2002\06\20@111441
by
Tal Dayan
7$ for a 84 pin PLD (clear logic) translates to about 8c per output. About
double than
using 595 shift registers.
Is it so ? Any cheaper alternative ?
Thanks,
Tal
> {Original Message removed}
2002\06\20@114934
by
Alan B. Pearce
>7$ for a 84 pin PLD (clear logic) translates to
>about 8c per output. About double than
>using 595 shift registers.
>Is it so ? Any cheaper alternative ?
Do not forget to factor in assembly costs, which will be significant for
that number of 595 devices, and could soon get you to the
programmed/assembled PLD cost.
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
RemoveMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestTakeThisOuT
spammitvma.mit.edu
2002\06\20@132850
by
Matt Pobursky
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:49:43 +0100, Alan B. Pearce wrote:
>>7$ for a 84 pin PLD (clear logic) translates to
>>about 8c per output. About double than
>>using 595 shift registers.
>
>>Is it so ? Any cheaper alternative ?
>
>Do not forget to factor in assembly costs, which will be
>significant for
>that number of 595 devices, and could soon get you to the
>programmed/assembled PLD cost.
And also PCB real estate area too. A 10mm or 14mm 100pin TQFP
takes up a whole lot less PCB area than the multitude of '595 SO
devices you'll need. There are lots of factors in the "true cost"
of a design, besides Bill of Material cost (which people many
times forget).
Matt Pobursky
Maximum Performance Systems
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
EraseMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestspam
spamBeGonemitvma.mit.edu
2002\06\20@164457
by
Bob Ammerman
|
A comment was made on this thread that the shift register solution required
many packages vs a CPLD or some such. Here are some counterarguments:
1: The packages involved are quite small (SO16) and don't take up all that
much space (how big is a 100 pin CPLD).
2: Since you only have to route a serial and two clock signals to each shift
register, so you can distribute them on the board to be close to their point
of use.
3: The lower density may permit the user of a 2-layer instead of 4-layer (or
more) board.
Also, the 0.32 price each at 100 drops quite a bit in larger quantites. How
about 0.1875 each in SO16 qty 10000 on tape and reel? That is a total of
0.1875 * 13 = $2.44 parts cost per board.
Sometimes simple is just what you need.
Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tal Dayan" <RemoveMEtalKILLspam
ZAPTA.COM>
To: <PICLISTSTOPspam
spam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Antwort: [PIC]: cheapest way for adding output pins ?
> Which result in about 4c per output pin.
>
> Translated to CPLD, 100 output device should
> cost 4$. Is this a reasonable price for a 100 output pin CPLD (or metal
mask
> equivalent) in large quantities ?
>
> Tal
>
> > {Original Message removed}
2002\06\20@172145
by
Spehro Pefhany
|
At 04:39 PM 6/20/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Also, the 0.32 price each at 100 drops quite a bit in larger quantites. How
>about 0.1875 each in SO16 qty 10000 on tape and reel? That is a total of
>0.1875 * 13 = $2.44 parts cost per board.
Philips parts from Pioneer: 0.175 ea. one reel at a time (2500) ($438.50 total)
or 0.164 in 10K. Or 0.137 in 4000 up from Avnet ($548 for 4K) (but no
stock there).
that's down to $1.78 per board parts cost, before further shopping around,
for a
quantity of only 300 boards (another advantage of using multiple cheap
parts, you
get the 4,000 price on the SRs, but only the 100's price on the bigger chips).
BTW, SSOP packages are offered too.
>Sometimes simple is just what you need.
Boring, available from multiple sources, works like a charm. Yup.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
spamBeGonespeffSTOPspam
EraseMEinterlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
9/11 United we Stand
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
KILLspampiclist-unsubscribe-requestspamBeGone
mitvma.mit.edu
2002\06\20@181329
by
Matt Pobursky
|
More counterarguments... ;)
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:39:07 -0400, Bob Ammerman wrote:
>A comment was made on this thread that the shift register
>solution required
>many packages vs a CPLD or some such. Here are some
>counterarguments:
>
>1: The packages involved are quite small (SO16) and don't take
>up all that
>much space (how big is a 100 pin CPLD).
About twice the space of (2) SO16's for a 14mm 100pin TQFP.
>2: Since you only have to route a serial and two clock signals
>to each shift
>register, so you can distribute them on the board to be close to
>their point
>of use.
That's true. If you are already working with a large physical
board then many IC's close to their termination makes sense.
>3: The lower density may permit the user of a 2-layer instead of
>4-layer (or
>more) board.
I routinely use 100+ pin CPLD's on 2 layer boards -- although 4
layers does make power/grounding easier and better. One other
factor though is that with the CPLD you have a lot of lattitude
in assigning pinouts such that you can "octopus" out from the
pins directly to their destination by judicious pin assignment.
In a current design I have a I/O expander type CPLD design that
has 48 digital I/O lines and zero vias on their traces.
>Also, the 0.32 price each at 100 drops quite a bit in larger
>quantites. How
>about 0.1875 each in SO16 qty 10000 on tape and reel? That is a
>total of
>0.1875 * 13 = $2.44 parts cost per board.
Parts cost will always be lower with discrete logic. I learned
that long ago. But sometimes the other physical and performance
related characteristics make the CPLD route a good choice too.
>Sometimes simple is just what you need.
Agreed.
Matt Pobursky
Maximum Performance Systems
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
EraseMEpiclist-unsubscribe-request
EraseMEmitvma.mit.edu
2002\06\20@182740
by
Pic Dude
Curious -- what exactly is "Antwort" that I occassionally
see in the subject line of these messages? I thought I
was up to date on the piclist and internet jargon, but I
may have missed this one.
Cheers,
-Neil.
{Original Message removed}
2002\06\20@183620
by
Andrew Warren
2002\06\20@190031
by
Mike Singer
|
Folks!
Do not be afraid to stick more then one PIC on PCB!
PCB can carry double!
With each 16F871 you get about 30 extra I/Os for < $2
in mass purchase. With Atmel Mega or TI MSP it looks even
better.
Good Luck!
Mike.
Bob Ammerman wrote:
{Quote hidden}> A comment was made on this thread that the shift register
> solution required
> many packages vs a CPLD or some such. Here are some counterarguments:
>
> 1: The packages involved are quite small (SO16) and don't
> take up all that
> much space (how big is a 100 pin CPLD).
>
> 2: Since you only have to route a serial and two clock
> signals to each shift
> register, so you can distribute them on the board to be close
> to their point
> of use.
>
> 3: The lower density may permit the user of a 2-layer instead
> of 4-layer (or
> more) board.
>
> Also, the 0.32 price each at 100 drops quite a bit in larger
> quantites. How
> about 0.1875 each in SO16 qty 10000 on tape and reel? That is
> a total of
> 0.1875 * 13 = $2.44 parts cost per board.
>
> Sometimes simple is just what you need.
>
> Bob Ammerman
> RAm Systems
>
>
>
> > Which result in about 4c per output pin.
> >
> > Translated to CPLD, 100 output device should
> > cost 4$. Is this a reasonable price for a 100 output pin
> CPLD (or metal
> mask
> > equivalent) in large quantities ?
> >
> > Tal
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > er... that should be 0.32 each, not 0.032 each.
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > 74HC595 gives you serial in 8 out with a latch, exactly
> what you need.
> > > >
> > > > 0.032 each at Digikey in 100's 16pin SOIC
> > > >
> > > > Bob Ammerman
> > > > RAm Systems
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > beside asics, there are also fpgas, which could eventually be
> > > > > interresting. with an altera 7128, you can get 84 outputs for
> > > about $9,
> > > or
> > > > > if you are happy with 0/3.3V, it drops by $1.
> > > > > for series production, you can migrate an altera design to
> > > clear logic.
> > > > > they produce asics based on fpga designs, with no nre
> cost. this
> drops
> > > the
> > > > > price by about 2.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > One of the designs I am working needs many (100 to
> 200) outputs pins
> > > (0/5V
> > > > > signal) controlled by a single mid size PIC. What is
> the cheapest
> way
> > > > > (cents
> > > > > per output pin) adding output pins to a PIC ?
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a mass production product but an ASIC is out of
> > > question at this
> > > > > point.
> > > > >
> > > > > Speed is not an a primary issue so using reasonable serial
> > > communication
> > > > > is
> > > > > OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Tal
> > > > >
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
TakeThisOuTpiclist-unsubscribe-request.....
TakeThisOuTmitvma.mit.edu
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2002
, 2003 only
- Today
- New search...