Searching \ for ' [OT] Re: Need some switch ideas' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=need+switch+ideas
Search entire site for: 'Re: Need some switch ideas'.

No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList Thread
'[PICLIST] [OT] Re: Need some switch ideas'
2001\04\04@105648 by Steve Nordhauser

picon face
This is interesting.  I would have to be sure that there isn't any radiated light....
and I always need the LED lit.  We have talked about the reed/hall effect
ideas with magnets - they are very good for this application.  The problem
seems to be that they all still require a movable actuator.  As someone suggested,
if the back of the actuator isn't sealed, there is no pressure differential.  Unfortunately,
that means that sand could get under the button head and jam the switch.  So, they
solve most of the power issues, but not the pressure issue unless I am missing
something.
Steve

Subject:
       Re: Need some switch ideas
  Date:
       Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:46:54 -0400
  From:
       Bob Ammerman <spam_OUTRAMMERMANTakeThisOuTspamPRODIGY.NET>

A variation on the optical theme....

Bounce a modulated LED at an angle from the interior thru the (Lexan?)
plastic enclosure to reflect at the plastic/water interface back thru the
wall of the enclosure to a phototransistor.

Placing your finger on the surface of the camera at the point where the beam
reflects might strongly affect the reflected signal.

Or, using the same technique by with a reflector on the back of a spring
mounted button. When the button is pressed in the reflector will bounce the
LED beam to the detector. When the button isn't pressed the beam won't be
reflected, or will miss the detector.

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
(contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
software)

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.


2001\04\04@120542 by Bob Ammerman

picon face
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Nordhauser <.....digitalKILLspamspam@spam@NYCAP.RR.COM>
To: <PICLISTspamKILLspamMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:56 AM
Subject: [OT] Re: Need some switch ideas


> This is interesting.  I would have to be sure that there isn't any
radiated light....

There would have to be  something radiated, I'm afraid.

> and I always need the LED lit.

Naw, just pulse it when you want to check.

> We have talked about the reed/hall effect
> ideas with magnets - they are very good for this application.  The problem
> seems to be that they all still require a movable actuator.  As someone
suggested,
> if the back of the actuator isn't sealed, there is no pressure
differential.  Unfortunately,
> that means that sand could get under the button head and jam the switch.
So, they
> solve most of the power issues, but not the pressure issue unless I am
missing
> something.

How about having the actuator move horizontally along the outside surface
instead of in-and-out. Now no sand can get behind it.

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
(contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
software)

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.


2001\04\04@175343 by steve

flavicon
face
> As someone suggested, if the back of the actuator
> isn't sealed, there is no pressure differential.  Unfortunately, that
> means that sand could get under the button head and jam the switch.
> So, they solve most of the power issues, but not the pressure issue
> unless I am missing something. Steve

Here's another approach.
If you take the constant pressure inside the enclosure out of the
equation, the problem goes away. What you have at the moment is
a rod with 1 atmosphere on one end and a varying pressure (1-6
atm) on the other. If you can apply the external pressure to the
other end of the rod, the two will cancel each other out so the key
pressure will remain constant, regardless of depth.

My ascii art sucks so I'll try a description to illustrate.

Take one waterproof box and drill a largish hole that goes right
through both sides. Stick a rubber patch over both holes. Measure
between the inside faces of the rubber sheet an cut a piece of solid
rod to match. When assembled, pressing one rubber patch will
make the other deflect outwards. When submerged, the pressure
deflection on both ends is the same so the rod doesn't move and
the box is still sealed.
Now put a cross piece on the bar so that it looks like a letter "t"
and position the cross piece above the switch on the circuit board.
Make one of the outside rubber patches inaccessable to fingers
with a (unsealed) cover of some sort and you have a push button
that has the same actuation pressure at any depth.

Obviously as described there are some practical limitations. You
can apply the same basic concept using pivots, etc to make it fit
within your mechanical constraints. Assuming you are moulding
your own case, the extra plastic costs almost nothing and you get
the constant switch pressure you require.

PS. I've been looking for a business related reason to travel to
North America/Canada and try some ice diving. You obviously need
to hire a consultant on this one. :-)

Steve.



======================================================
Steve Baldwin                Electronic Product Design
TLA Microsystems Ltd         Microcontroller Specialists
PO Box 15-680, New Lynn      http://www.tla.co.nz
Auckland, New Zealand        ph  +64 9 820-2221
email: .....stevebKILLspamspam.....tla.co.nz      fax +64 9 820-1929
======================================================

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.


More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2001 , 2002 only
- Today
- New search...