No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList
Thread
'[PICLIST] [EE] looking for TLO72 and / or TLO82 da'
2000\10\17@111322
by
Maxime Prati
2000\10\17@112247
by
Alan B. Pearce
2000\10\17@115122
by
David VanHorn
2000\10\17@130147
by
David Minkler
2000\10\17@130938
by
Dan Michaels
Maxime Prati wrote:
>hi !
>
>I'm looking for operational amplifiers TLO72 and / or TLO82 datasheet...
>can someone point me where can I find them ...
>
OK, but after you get the datasheet, use an LF353 or LF412 instead.
All 3 look very similar, and TL082 looks "identical" to LF353 on the
d/s, but the LFxxx parts work vastly better at higher frequencies,
in my experience.
regards,
- Dan Michaels
==============
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
use KILLspamlistservKILLspam
mitvma.mit.edu?body=SET%20PICList%20DIGEST
2000\10\17@132529
by
David VanHorn
>
>OK, but after you get the datasheet, use an LF353 or LF412 instead.
>All 3 look very similar, and TL082 looks "identical" to LF353 on the
>d/s, but the LFxxx parts work vastly better at higher frequencies,
>in my experience.
Sometimes that's a minus.
Like my current project, where I have to buffer a 10mV signal cleanly,
while sitting two inches away from an antenna radiating 6W 5mS pulses at
915 MHz.
I had to select for the slowest fet "precision" op-amp in order to supress
the EMI from direct rectification in the chip itself.
Layout already handled, impedances as low as possible....
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
use RemoveMElistservTakeThisOuTmitvma.mit.edu?body=SET%20PICList%20DIGEST
2000\10\17@141008
by
Dan Michaels
|
Dave VanHorn wrote:
>>
>>OK, but after you get the datasheet, use an LF353 or LF412 instead.
>>All 3 look very similar, and TL082 looks "identical" to LF353 on the
>>d/s, but the LFxxx parts work vastly better at higher frequencies,
>>in my experience.
>
>Sometimes that's a minus.
>Like my current project, where I have to buffer a 10mV signal cleanly,
>while sitting two inches away from an antenna radiating 6W 5mS pulses at
>915 MHz.
>
>I had to select for the slowest fet "precision" op-amp in order to supress
>the EMI from direct rectification in the chip itself.
>
>Layout already handled, impedances as low as possible....
>
[good to hear from you, Dave, but durn it, that's that same box
you were working on 6 months ago - don't you have it fixed yet?
--> just KIDDING].
But seriously - if you are working with signals faster than slow
mud, then the LFxxx chips are fairly good up to about 1 Mhz. For
better performance in this same range, try the TLE2072/2082 from
TI. There are also a lot of dual opamps with GBW [gain bandwidth]
much faster - 20-70 Mhz, but they take more care when dealing with.
- danM
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
use spamBeGonelistservspamBeGonemitvma.mit.edu?body=SET%20PICList%20DIGEST
2000\10\17@153151
by
David VanHorn
>
>[good to hear from you, Dave, but durn it, that's that same box
>you were working on 6 months ago - don't you have it fixed yet?
>--> just KIDDING].
Nope, it's been in development for three years! That part's fixed though.
It's a very deliberate process, with some rather un-cooperative vendors.
The latest proto begins field testing today, as a matter of fact.
However, another is in the brew now, which has HUGE quantity potential.
It also has much fewer constraints, having been designed from the ground
up, rather than being "Evolved" out of available bits.
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
use TakeThisOuTlistservEraseMEspam_OUTmitvma.mit.edu?body=SET%20PICList%20DIGEST
2000\10\17@210629
by
Brent Brown
> hi !
>
> I'm looking for operational amplifiers TLO72 and / or TLO82 datasheet...
> can someone point me where can I find them ...
Just for your info, have been involved with a couple of designs
where lots of TL084's (quad version) were specified, but ended up
using TL064's for a HUGE reduction in power, no noticeable
change in performance in these applications. Data sheets from TI
website.
Brent Brown
Electronic Design Solutions
16 English Street
Hamilton, New Zealand
Ph/fax: +64 7 849 0069
Mobile/text: 025 334 069
eMail: RemoveMEbrent.brownTakeThisOuTclear.net.nz
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
use listservEraseME.....mitvma.mit.edu?body=SET%20PICList%20DIGEST
2000\10\17@230847
by
David VanHorn
>
>Just for your info, have been involved with a couple of designs
>where lots of TL084's (quad version) were specified, but ended up
>using TL064's for a HUGE reduction in power, no noticeable
>change in performance in these applications. Data sheets from TI
>website.
That was the original part number designators.
6X, low power
7X, low noise
8X, low cost
X= 1,2,4 depending on how many amps in the package.
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
use EraseMElistservmitvma.mit.edu?body=SET%20PICList%20DIGEST
2000\10\24@194645
by
David VanHorn
>
>[good to hear from you, Dave, but durn it, that's that same box
>you were working on 6 months ago - don't you have it fixed yet?
>--> just KIDDING].
Nope, it's been in development for three years! That part's fixed though.
It's a very deliberate process, with some rather un-cooperative vendors.
The latest proto begins field testing today, as a matter of fact.
However, another is in the brew now, which has HUGE quantity potential.
It also has much fewer constraints, having been designed from the ground
up, rather than being "Evolved" out of available bits.
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
"[PIC]:","[SX]:","[AVR]:" =uP ONLY! "[EE]:","[OT]:" =Other "[BUY]:","[AD]:" =Ads
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2000
, 2001 only
- Today
- New search...
