Searching \ for '[PIC] The Piclist is Back! But slow ??' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Search entire site for: 'The Piclist is Back! But slow ??'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[PIC] The Piclist is Back! But slow ??'
2004\09\14@170211 by Jan-Erik Soderholm

face picon face
Hi.
Is it only my posts, or does everyone see quite long
distribution times when posting ?
That is, before one gets ones own posts back.
My last post took aprox 5 hours to return to me.
I've checked the RFC headers, and the delay is not
in my ISP's servers, as far as I can see.

No big deal maybe, just curious...

Best Regards,
Jan-Erik.

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\09\14@185230 by olin_piclist

face picon face
Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> Is it only my posts, or does everyone see quite long
> distribution times when posting ?
> That is, before one gets ones own posts back.
> My last post took aprox 5 hours to return to me.
> I've checked the RFC headers, and the delay is not
> in my ISP's servers, as far as I can see.

I'm seeing erratic and unexpectedly large delays too.  It usually takes at
least 10 minutes until I see my own post, but often much longer.  Post also
seem to be out of order more so than with the old list server.  A few times
I've seen replies to posts and then received the original post a half hour
or more later.


*****************************************************************
Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\09\15@034719 by Alan B. Pearce

face picon face
>Is it only my posts, or does everyone see
>quite long distribution times when posting ?

Yeah, for some reason the new mail server has a very long turn around of
messages. The best I have had so far is about 45 min.

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\09\15@040716 by Dan Smith

face picon face
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:49:05 +0100, Alan B. Pearce <spam_OUTa.b.pearceTakeThisOuTspamrl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Yeah, for some reason the new mail server has a very long turn around of
> messages. The best I have had so far is about 45 min.

I find it varies quite a bit.  I received your message after 12
minutes, but others can take anything up to an hour.  Maybe MIT have
some sort of bandwidth limiting on the outgoing mail.

Dan
List Admin #6
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\09\15@154513 by Dave King

flavicon
face
At 01:07 AM 15/09/2004, you wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:49:05 +0100, Alan B. Pearce <.....a.b.pearceKILLspamspam@spam@rl.ac.uk>
>wrote:
> > Yeah, for some reason the new mail server has a very long turn around of
> > messages. The best I have had so far is about 45 min.
>
>I find it varies quite a bit.  I received your message after 12
>minutes, but others can take anything up to an hour.  Maybe MIT have
>some sort of bandwidth limiting on the outgoing mail.
>
>Dan
>List Admin #6

How about 14 hours from the time I hit the send button to when it showed on
the list?
Reply to message yesterday.

This one sent at  12:30PST

Dave

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2004 , 2005 only
- Today
- New search...