Post by thread:[PIC] Re: Jal keeps setting the wrong oscillator t

James Newton's tags... :) On 8/20/05, Vasile Surducan <spam_OUTpiclist9TakeThisOuTgmail.com> wrote: {Quote hidden}> On 8/20/05, Jason <.....picKILLspam@spam@canadaspeaks.com> wrote: > > I hope PIC is the right tag for this. > > > > I'm using Jal to write a program for a 16F628 using the INTRC I/O. My > > programmer is the Picstart Plus, and I'm using MPLAB to write the chip. > > Every time I import the hex file generate by Jal, the oscillator type is set > > back to HS. > > > > Any ideas why? > > You have a problem with the programmer software or you haven't used > corect the pragma target fuses command. A long time ago one of the > Icprog versions did the same thing. > > Vasile > > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > --

If you guys will close the Yahoo JAL list I'll be happy to add a tag for [JAL] on this list. No more Yahoo ads... No more everyone in the world being able to read your email addresses... (just most people <grin>) And lots of cooperation on issues of EE and PIC. I've already added SX and AVR and they see very little traffic. SX people post on the parallax forum and AVR people have their own lists, so it makes no sense to add JAL unless there is a closure of the Yahoo list. --- James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin jamesnewtonKILLspampiclist.com 1-619-652-0593 phone http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786 PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com > {Original Message removed}

> If you guys will close the Yahoo JAL list I'll be happy to > add a tag for > [JAL] on this list. did you CC to the jallist? some people there were complaining about the occasional spam (I have never seen spam on the piclist), but personally I never found that a problem. I don't care, I read both (and the yahoo piclist) anyway. Wouter van Ooijen -- ------------------------------------------- Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: http://www.voti.nl consultancy, development, PICmicro products docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: http://www.voti.nl/hvu

On 8/24/05, James Newton, Host <.....jamesnewtonKILLspam.....piclist.com> wrote: > If you guys will close the Yahoo JAL list I'll be happy to add a tag for > [JAL] on this list. I think I'll be sad. There's about 4 or 5 years since I'm visiting this list. High quality "old boy" people there. High fantesy. Enlighten minds. And proffesional guys. The only advantage of jal list versus pic list is the relative low numbers of posts which makes it much easy to read. The posts on piclist are too long, too much poetry. Like my answer here. cheers, Vasile {Quote hidden}> No more Yahoo ads... No more everyone in the world being able to read your > email addresses... (just most people <grin>) > > And lots of cooperation on issues of EE and PIC. > > I've already added SX and AVR and they see very little traffic. SX people > post on the parallax forum and AVR people have their own lists, so it makes > no sense to add JAL unless there is a closure of the Yahoo list. > > --- > James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin > EraseMEjamesnewtonspam_OUTTakeThisOuTpiclist.com 1-619-652-0593 phone > http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786 > PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com > > > > > > {Original Message removed}

On Thursday 25 August 2005 07:59 pm, Vasile Surducan scribbled: > On 8/24/05, James Newton, Host <jamesnewtonspam_OUTpiclist.com> wrote: > > If you guys will close the Yahoo JAL list I'll be happy to add a tag for > > [JAL] on this list. > > I think I'll be sad. There's about 4 or 5 years since I'm visiting this > list. High quality "old boy" people there. High fantesy. Enlighten minds. > And proffesional guys. > The only advantage of jal list versus pic list is the relative low > numbers of posts which makes it much easy to read. The posts on > piclist are too long, too much poetry. Like my answer here. You should try the 7x10-Minilathe list. 90% politics, 1% about lathes, and the other 9% made up of the occassional post asking why there is so much politics. The list is actually made up of a bunch of experts who know everything and so don't need to ask/discuss much else. BTW, why require the Yahoo JAL list to be closed? Why not add the tag here anyway, and if people wish to use this one instead, they can do so? Cheers, -Neil.

On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:48:57AM -0500, PicDude wrote: > On Thursday 25 August 2005 07:59 pm, Vasile Surducan scribbled: > > On 8/24/05, James Newton, Host <@spam@jamesnewtonKILLspampiclist.com> wrote: > > > If you guys will close the Yahoo JAL list I'll be happy to add a tag for > > > [JAL] on this list. James, There's no reason to close the JAL list. Also if you going to add a tag, it should be generic. Maybe something like [HLL]. That'll cover JAL, C, Forth, NPCI (as I start to ramp it up this fall), and the like. BAJ

> Also if you going to add a tag, it should be generic. > Maybe something like [HLL]. That'll cover > JAL, C, Forth, > NPCI (as I start to ramp it up this fall), and the like. I don't think C and Jal users will be very interested in each others discussions. Also Jal is much more specific than C: maybe there should be [C30], [HitechC], etc. Or just keep it as is... Wouter van Ooijen -- ------------------------------------------- Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: http://www.voti.nl consultancy, development, PICmicro products docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: http://www.voti.nl/hvu

From: "PicDude" <KILLspampicdude2KILLspamnarwani.org> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 1:48 AM > BTW, why require the Yahoo JAL list to be closed? Why not add the tag here > anyway, and if people wish to use this one instead, they can do so? My guess would be that having a JAL tag here with the JAL list running means most people will feel the need to cross post questions to both places, and most active participants be on both lists, effectively making everything happen twice. I've been a lurker (and sometimes poster) on the Yahoo JAL list for about a year since I discovered JAL. It is a good list, but I don't really like the Yahoo list interface.

From: "Wouter van Ooijen" <RemoveMEwouterTakeThisOuTvoti.nl> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:35 PM > did you CC to the jallist? some people there were complaining about the > occasional spam (I have never seen spam on the piclist), but personally > I never found that a problem. I don't care, I read both (and the yahoo > piclist) anyway. There was no need to CC it once I looked up the pragma command you provided here. I do read the Yahoo JAL list though.

>I've been a lurker (and sometimes poster) on the Yahoo JAL list for about a >year since I discovered JAL. It is a good list, but I don't really like the >Yahoo list interface. > > You can receive the JAL-list as email, besides it's far more easier to read, you'll build up your archive. Stef > > >