Exact match. Not showing close matches.
'[PIC] PICkit 2 was Re: OSS'
This has something to do with PIC so I change the tag and subject.
On 12/18/05, Olin Lathrop <embedinc.com> wrote: olin_piclist
> Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
> >> Now PICkit 2 is doing a similar thing --> it will hurt third-party
> >> vendors once the chip supports build up. Microchip can afford not to
> >> earn much money from PICkit 2 since they earn money
> >> from chips sale but small vendors may not be able to do that.
> > But once PICkit2 supports all PICs small vendors like me can concentrate
> > on other things like high-end programmers and gang programmers.
> > Personally I would probably concentrate on target boards. As a vendor
> > you can't be lazy.
I like Wouter's proactive attitude. ;-) And I think target board is a nice
field to be the focus of small vendors. Gang programmers seems to be
highly specialized and may not be so easy to enter.
> The PICKit2 is also not a very robust circuit. I don't remember the
> details, but I looked at it a while ago and wasn't that impressed. It's
> also really a development board which can be used as a programmer. Of
> course this doesn't make it less of a programmer, but it does make it
> klunky. I think there is room for a good and solid USB programmer.
> Unfortunately with Microchip selling a quick and dirty version for a low
> price it makes it difficult to compete with a better programmer.
I tend to agree that PICkit 2 is not a very robust circuit. However I do
not agree that it is a quick and dirty version even though it is of low price.
Itself is not a development board. The LPC demo board can be sold
as a bundle with PICkit 2. PICkit 1 is a programmer cum development board.
> But I'm experimenting with that concept now anyway. I'll get the first
> boards back next week and am working on the BOM and ordering parts for the
> first 3 prototypes right now. This programmer (tentatively called the
> EasyUSB) will have full variable Vpp and Vdd plus decent PGC and PGD drive
> that can be shorted to ground or Vdd indefinitely without damage. It will
> be completely powered from the USB, although I'm adding pads for external 5V
> and serial connection which will be useful at least for debugging. It
> should be easy to get the serial working first, then dig into the USB part
> on both the PIC and the host. That may take a few months.
Take note that EasyUSB may well be trademarked (Antec EasyUSB).
I remember that Bob Axtell has a similar idea of making this (Kits185?)
and I am not so sure if it is still to be released soon. I remember it will
be sold at more than US$100 retail.
I like the idea of protecting PGC/PGD. Variable Vpp and Vdd are also
good to have.
> I'm also making the hardware capable of being a debugger. Unfortunately
> that's the easy part. Making it work in MPLAB as a debugger won't be
> trivial, and I'm not sure I'll do it. For now I'm just making sure the
> hardware and firmware are capable and allow dealing with the host side MPLAB
> issues later. If this ever gets done, it should be a very nice alternative
> to the ICD2 for probably around 1/4 to 1/3 the cost.
Without Microchip releasing the on-chip debug protocol of 18F and dsPIC
and the ICD2-MPLAB communication API, this will be hard to do. If this
can be done, it will be a very interesting product.
Take note PICKit 2 is also hardware capable as being a debugger.
Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I tend to agree that PICkit 2 is not a very robust circuit. However I
> not agree that it is a quick and dirty version even though it is of
> low price. Itself is not a development board. The LPC demo board can
> be sold
> as a bundle with PICkit 2. PICkit 1 is a programmer cum development
Now that you mention this, I may have gotten PICKit 1 and 2 confused.
> Take note that EasyUSB may well be trademarked (Antec EasyUSB).
Well I can probably come up with another name. EasyUSB came from EasyProg
and USB. Oh well.
> I remember
> it will be sold at more than US$100 retail.
I've got a handle on bare parts cost. Don't know about labor and other
costs yet, but I expect it will be well under $100.
> Without Microchip releasing the on-chip debug protocol of 18F and
> and the ICD2-MPLAB communication API, this will be hard to do.
I have NDA and access to this.
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, (978) 742-9014. #1 PIC
consultant in 2004 program year. http://www.embedinc.com/products
Chen Xiao Fan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olin
> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 8:08 AM
> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
> Subject: Re: [PIC] PICkit 2 was Re: OSS
> I've got a handle on bare parts cost. Don't know about labor
> and other costs yet, but I expect it will be well under $100.
That is great! Still it needs to offer more values than
PICkit 2 which retailed at US$35. The debugger feature
is definitely a plus since you have access to that
debug protocol and communication API.
>> Without Microchip releasing the on-chip debug protocol
>> of 18F and dsPIC and the ICD2-MPLAB communication API,
>> this will be hard to do.
> I have NDA and access to this.
I see. May I ask how to do that?
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2005
, 2006 only
- New search...